Sarah Ferrer, a student in my current Inside-Out class, had a guest editorial published in The Oregonian newspaper this week. Writing a letter to an editor or to a state representative is an assignment in the class, submitting it is not. Sarah went above and beyond my expectations when she wrote not just a letter, but an editorial, and had it accepted by Oregon’s largest newspaper. She begins by writing:
I am not a criminologist. I am a biochemistry and biophysics honors student at Oregon State University. Over the past term, I have participated in a criminology class that has given me the opportunity to explore the impact incarceration has on communities. Here’s the catch: More than half of the students enrolled in the class are serving time at Hillcrest Youth Correctional Facility. I have the unique experience of learning about incarceration from the incarcerated. My goal here is not to give an expert’s opinion (for I am not one), but to share some of the things I have learned and to encourage readers to educate themselves on the implications of mass incarceration.
She then goes on to use information from class materials, particularly Todd Clear’s Imprisoning Communities, to highlight the inequities and inefficiencies in our current system and to push for prison reform.
To this point there are 97 comments following her editorial; it’s the third most active opinion piece over the last 7 days. Many of the comments are very harsh and suggest that Sarah is too young and naive to deserve a voice in the conversation, or they dismiss her as being another “bleeding heart” duped and manipulated by her criminal classmates.
To her credit, Sarah knew full well that she was opening herself to public critique and nastiness when she submitted her editorial. And she has engaged in thoughtful, reasoned debate with the comments, clarifying points and offering additional information and perspective. All in all, I am very proud of her for sparking this important discussion and engaging in public debate over prison reform. Seeing an undergraduate student make this kind of educational effort makes me very hopeful that today’s students will lead the charge toward positive change, more caring communities, and a brighter future for us all.
Comments 8
Run 3 — November 27, 2017
This blog is so nice to me. I will continue to come here again and again. Visit my link as well. Good luck
Nicole — March 12, 2018
I am in fact Thankful to the owner of this site who shared really impressive article with us.
Alison Paul — March 25, 2018
It's really better than any other site.
run 3 — June 5, 2018
true is very impressive! I have no luck reading your post! But I was convinced by dare thoughts and dare to act!
Steve Brooks — December 14, 2018
She is very brave. I would like to find some more info about her. Is it possible?
Neal Burgstahler — September 3, 2020
According to a Clackamas County probation officer that I met, most men with felony convictions continue their life of crime (90+%) in some form and most go into construction after release. As luck would have it, there is no law enforcement that has jurisdiction over criminal fraud in construction. Which is why former criminals like construction, especially residential construction. Over at least the last 60 years, the step by step method to sabotage any residential project has been worked out to the tee, whereupon the end result is to sue the structural engineer for $1M for talking about the case by illegally wiretapping his phone and emails, after the engineer was named in the suit for not catching the contractor sabotaging his own project. "Shooting the moon" is just one time tested method used nationwide in sabotaging a home so that a lawsuit occurs in short order after the owner moves in.
tunnel rush — December 7, 2020
This is a massive publicity!
joneshalcyonn — December 7, 2020
This is a massive publicity! tunnel rush