What’s new?
If you read the blog regularly, you’ve seen this before. So what’s new, you ask? Well, for one thing, we decided it was necessary to add a lactation area. It’s adjacent to the attendant’s booth; in a perfect world the attendant can watch the stroller while mom pumps or breastfeeds. The divider between the lactation area and the attendant’s booth is a heavy curtain – like a theatre’s curtain – so that if mom has little kids running around, there are fewer places for fingers to be pinched. Swinging doors and small children have been known to be a bad combination, especially when mom may not be able to react in a lightening quick fashion as she is in the midst of feeding a different child or pumping (or changing a different child’s diaper). Furthermore, the lactation area is near the attendant to lend the sensibility and the reality of extra watchfulness over both mom’s with their breasts out and the potentially escaping toddlers. This configuration also places the lactation area just about as far away from the noise and commotion of the rest of the bathroom as is possible. Nobody likes to eat where others…well, you know what I mean. We included a changing area in here in addition to the one in the main space because we figured it would be more convenient for moms who are breastfeeding to have the opportunity to change a baby right in the same spot. There wasn’t enough space for a toilet (for mom herself, or for accompanying folks like dads, siblings, and nannies). We were hoping to have space for at least two lactating moms or a lactating mom and a dad to fit in this cubby of a space. But I’ll leave it as an open question? Should we have fully enclosed this space and put a toilet in there? Or is it better that two moms can do what they need to do at the same time? Leaving it a little bigger and not stuffed with a toilet also means dad or grandma or whoever is part of the crew can have a spot next to mom while she pumps or breastfeeds.
Adding the lactation area forced us to reorient the attendant’s booth to face mostly into the main bathroom area. There is still a small window on the right hand side which will be the first thing most people see as they enter the bathroom. Folks who are a little shy about asking for tampons or clean needles or whatever like that might be able to approach the smaller, more private side window rather than the big one in the front. However, from the big front window, the attendant will be able to see most of what is going on in the main space, save for the urinal area. There was discussion of adding a one-way mirror between the attendant’s booth and the urinals, high enough so that no penises would be in view. This would allow the attendant to be within site of just about everything, save the individual stalls. Safety would be increased, privacy would be decreased. What do you think? Mirror or no mirror? Remember, the one-way mirror would be located too high to see any penises unless those penises were attached to someone standing well away from a urinal.
What’s new?
In this office scale version, I reconfigured some of the wall segments and added a completely new one in the middle of the space after a commenter on this blog mentioned that visibility into (and out of) the urinals might not be desirable and would be easy to screen. He was right. Now men can be more comfortable knowing that they cannot be seen and nobody will spot the back of a man at a urinal upon stepping into the bathroom. There are still more stalls than urinals – better for women and men, if you ask me. Not better for the environment since toilets use far more water than urinals (especially when the urinals are waterless, as they now are in many new construction projects).
Style points?
I admit these are not the most stylish of plans. I’m not an architect and not aware of all the style conventions employed to make plans both interesting and legible. I’m taking opinions on what to change. Bring it on, folks, bring it on.
I decided to give the sinks a radial gradient though now I’m not sure if it’s obvious that they are sinks. I made the font bigger in the stadium version because it appears that our publisher will be printing it at about the same scale as the one you see above. Small.
The book?
The book – “Toilet: The Public Restroom and the Politics of Sharing” will come out on World Toilet Day, November 19, 2010. These two images, or images quite like these, will appear in the concluding chapter by Harvey Molotch.
Comments 6
mariawolters — June 21, 2010
I'm sorry, but I have no problems with nursing discreetly in public. I'm aware that many women are more reluctant to feed their children in public, so a solution like yours is probably needed, but I would be aghast at being forced into a small enclosed space to feed my child.
NB - in Scotland, where I live, nursing mothers have a RIGHT to nurse their babies in public spaces where children are allowed. And most mothers do so discreetly.
steph — June 21, 2010
Given that the majority of civilized places allow breastfeeding to occour anywhere, I would suggest that a special lactating space is unnecissary for the stadium version. A private place to lie down and/or pump would be very useful in the office version, however.
Alison — June 21, 2010
When oh when are we going to be able to decouple baby feeding from baby changing?
The restroom of the future doesn't need a "lactation area". If some mothers prefer to feed their babies (whether by breast or bottle) setting aside an area for that is helpful. Putting it in a public toilet is not. How many of us would like to have our dinner in a toilet?
Anyone? No, I don't see any hands raised.
Linzk425 — June 22, 2010
What to change? The lactation area - get rid of it. Do you eat in the bathroom? Why do you think a woman wants to feed a baby there?
Also, breastfeeding women lactate all day long. What you have there is a "feeding" station. At which point you might start to realise maybe putting it in the toilets isn't the best thing. Most breastfeeding women don't need somewhere special to go, they want to be able to sit with their friends, or family, eat their own meal AT THE SAME TIME as they feed their baby. Putting "lactation stations" in toilets will make this harder rather than easier, and will continue to give society (US society especially) a reason to hide the fact that breastfeeding isn't dirty.
Baptiste Coulmont » Liens utiles — July 12, 2010
[...] “Numéri-Flash” sur hyperbate Ce que Latour fait au monde : il énerve et il invite Les toilettes du futur : un livre que je vais acheter Affaire Woerth chez l’énervé de service Obscénité, [...]