
When we hike or bike in preserved space, such as a state or national park, we’re not just enjoying nature—we’re experiencing a contested political space. Take, for example, the Trump administration’s executive order on March 27, 2025, calling for the removal of any content on United States (U.S.) Department of the Interior properties—including National Park Service (NPS) sites—that “inappropriately disparages Americans past or living” or casts America in a “negative light.” Beyond its historical absurdity, the order is a clear example of government censorship that risks scrubbing parks of information about historically marginalized communities, which often include different, yet important stories of oppression, discrimination, and inequality. Because of this order, visitors to national parks, monuments, and other federally preserved outdoor spaces are now encountering signs asking them to report any “unpatriotic” information or exhibits. The impact of the order was on full display this past January, when NPS ordered the removal of exhibits on slavery and George Washington’s treatment of slaves at Independence National Historical Park in Philadelphia. Spaces for recreation and leisure are marked by power struggles over who gets to define each space’s meaning and national significance.








