monte on April 9, 2008
An Epistle to my University President
Dear President Lowe,
I’m sorry to trouble you again about this library situation but the conflict has escalated considerably since yesterday and the Provost is out ill. Upon your suggestion, I went to our Safety and Security (SS) Director’s office to work out a solution. To say that the meeting did not go well would be a diplomatic euphemism.
Let me review the background story. My geography colleague and I returned from spring break to discover that our I.D. cards no longer seemed to work. I was on my way to have a new card made because I thought I might have accidentally deactivated mine. I stopped at the security desk to check if others were having trouble. The security officer gave me a very ambiguous and evasive answer. He said something to the effect that some changes were due to Daylight Savings Time and that others were due to security issues.
Neither of us received any prior notification of these changes. The SS Director later told me that the security officers were to have advised us of these changes in advance. I talked with the day security staff: they said that they had never received any such instructions.
The SS Director has now sent an e-mail to his bosses that he thinks will retroactively vindicate his actions. In truth, his message only indicts him. Exposing his real intent, he cites a security report that documents my having unlocked and used, without prior authorization, an empty classroom for a 30-minute small group session. I had previously apologized to the Educational Services Director for my offense and endured a lecture about the sanctity of classroom security. Obviously, I had not shown enough contrition. The removal of my security clearance is punishment, pure and simple.
The library also houses several faculty librarians. It is now obvious that the stripping of only the third floor faculty of access was a thinly veiled attempt to disguise my punishment. In his e-mail, the SS Director attempts to rationalize why the library faculty retains full access while the social science faculty on third floor lost theirs. Unbeknownst to the SS Director, one of three faculty members he reduced access for is a newly hired faculty librarian. Unwittingly, he has exposed both how little he knows about the library and its inhabitants, and that his grounds for depriving non-library faculty of access are spurious.
The last time I checked, the SS Director neither is the Vice President of Academic Affairs nor is he the Library Dean. When did he acquire the omnipotent knowledge to decipher the daily activities of library faculty? How did he discern that their needs for access to classrooms differ qualitatively from those of the social science faculty? What is the justification for support staff having almost unlimited security clearance, while the social science faculty is restricted?
This whole Keystone Cops routine has been nothing more than a poorly disguised case of retaliatory action.
The issue is simple: do teachers or do bureaucrats control the classroom? Is the Facilities office here to serve the academic mission of the university; or, is the faculty here to serve as obedient subordinates to the Facilities staff? The bottom line is that Metropolitan State University is not the Oak Park Heights “Supermax” Correctional Facility nor is the SS Director in charge of Homeland Security.
I have repeatedly taught in every prison in the metropolitan area. I no longer see any qualitative difference between prison security and our own Facilities office when it comes to command-and-control techniques. It would be a wake-up call for you to realize how similar Oak Park Heights and our Library and Learning Center are in their use of apparatchiks and electronic remote control to discipline space and access.
Some of us have devoted a good share of our working lives trying to being good citizens of the Metropolitan State community. For us, this is not a career but a calling. Sometimes it seems that the administration is unwilling to concede that faculty members have reached the age of reason, are competent professionals, and are not about to steal markers or erasers from a classroom. We are not infants, inferiors, or criminals.
As a member of this university’s faculty for 24 years, I increasingly feel as if we are working on a campus occupied by foreign troops, an imperial army of bureaucratic mandarins. Rest assured, this is about more than the intrusive directives of the Minnesota State College and University (MnSCU) system’s central office—we have our own oversupply of quislings. To paraphrase Emerson, inhumane bureaucratic rules are in the saddle and ride the faculty.
I am not naive. I realize that this über-centralized control of college teachers by bean counters and paper shufflers is ubiquitous. Nevertheless, I remain a realistic resister who will not go quietly. I refuse to be a spectator as this increasingly dehumanized university hastens the early retirement of valued colleagues.
Let me pose a simple solution. With a single act, you could re-establish the principle that administrative services exist to meet the needs of teaching and learning. The library is a peculiarly unique entity on this campus. It is nearly singular in both its mission and function. Make the Library Dean the czar of the Library and Learning Center.
Oh My God, wouldn’t that violate the institutional chain of command? “Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead!”
Best,
Monte (#2010012000210)P.S. Perhaps the central administration is really conducting a cruel replication of Zimbardo’s infamous prison experiment at Stanford University in 1971. If so, I’ve checked with the Institutional Review Board—they have not yet received an application for approval of this research project.
56 Hours Later . . .
Gentlemen,
I wanted to let you know that your security card access was restored to the level that existed prior to the recent change. It is possible that your card may not work. If that happens, please contact the Library security officer and she will resolve the problem. Thank you.Dan Hambrock
Associate Vice President for Capital Planning and Campus ServicesA pre-Simmelian Social Type
Why do I do these things? I am, by temperament, an anti-authoritarian populist. Since early childhood, I’ve impetuously challenged any perceived abuse of power or authority. To be honest, sometimes my little outbursts are quixotic in nature—not all windmills are giants.
From time to time, however, others share my grievances against the powers-that-be. At those moments, my rebellious lead attracts a following and the battle is on. Although primarily a man of action, I am still enough of a contemplative to crave those second-order concepts that help elucidate my first-order experiences. I am not one of those constipated sociologists who shy from the interpretative power of metaphor and analogy. This propensity draws me ever closer to Georg Simmel, particularly his literary renderings of social type.
I recently discovered the xia, an ancient social type who predates Simmel by over two millennia. Albert A. Dalia, a Sinologist and novelist, devotes several posts to explicating the historical and literary lineage of the xia (http://thedragongateinn.com/pblog/). Dating from the Warring States (403-221 B.C.E.) and Han Dynasty (206 B.C.E.-220 C.E.) periods of Chinese history, the xia is a venerable ancestor of the anti-authoritarian populist.
Relegated to the lower ranks of society, and with many of the options for advancement closed to him, the xia was not held in very high regard by the elite. To the masses of common people however, the xia was frequently a person to look up to. He was a mythic character who opposed the oppressive landlords and corrupt officials. . . . Their parallel code of ethics and behavior represent the flip side of the Chinese establishment, and rather than being antagonistic to tradition, xia behavior is complementary—yin to yang. This duality of nature is reflected in the juxtaposition of xia and scholars. The xiarespected in times of chaos, while the scholar is highly regarded during times of stability. Thus, the xia in his youth frequently becomes a scholar as he matures and gains wisdom.—Eric Jin
The Human Genome Project will never decode the genealogy of this xia.
Comments 8
Bryan — April 11, 2008
Another good piece Monte. So well written, I am not sure there is much room to squeeze in a few points, so I will only make a couple!
Off the cuff (being at work has its disadvantages), I am hearing a commentary on authority. I enjoyed the reference to Xia. Suck a linking back could almost start a discussion as to whether anti-authoritarianism comes from nature or nurture. But as with most things in life, I believe it to be somewhat of both.
On the one hand, we are animals (I sometimes think we are not so far removed from our more pack like hominids—but our current displays of state violence would be an insult to their better natures). We are said to have basic freight or flight impulses that have influence on our decision making. To what degree an individual is able to rationally interrupt such biological responses I leave to the psychologist. But the point being, that a lower cast of animal group would take the opportunity to be an alpha – the ability to eat well along with the desires of mating are not simply the purview of animals alone!
However, even in animals an argument could be made that such behavior is learned. That if animals could just learn a different way of group behavior, dominance issues could be settled in more civilized ways.
Which leads to the question of nurture. I seem to remember a class discussion on why many 1960’s “counter-culture” actors dressed in western fashion. Cowboy boots and hats, along with a new fascination with native American beliefs and dress were said to have been learned from 1950’s television shows. The image of the rugged individual, alone in the wilderness, and certainly not taking orders from the law, made for a perfect display of anti-authoritarianism during the 60’s. I have certain reservations to the degree of this idea, but it does help to highlight anti-authoritarianism as being a learned and—thankfully—desirable quality.
The complexities of authority in the contemporary world go far beyond such simple questions as nature or nurture. But I think as you have show with your own self reflection, individual questioning as to how we understand authority is the only way to begin a more thoughtful discussion on such a topic of great importance!
But there I go questioning authority structures again!
All the Best Monte
Cox — April 12, 2008
A note from the applied world.
Recently, I was invited by a hospital to present data to a group of physicians, nurses and med students. This is one of the highlights of my job. It warms my heart to see the data we collect used at the local level. As an invited guest, my prep work is simple. Book a flight. Create brightly-colored data pies. Show up on time with my personality in tow.
Now I know to call security before accepting an invitation to present hospital-level data to hospital folks at the hospital in the hospital boardroom.
Before I made it to the boardroom, a security officer stopped me. He pointed to my Federal ID and asked for my hospital badge. I explained that I was in town for one day only. A guest. An invited guest.
I was asked to follow him outside and across a field to a small building surrounded by a chain link fence. He called the boardroom and explained that I would be late.
At this point I thought I might need a visitor sticker. The thought bubble above my head read, "Is there a guest book I failed to sign? Explain the hoops Man! I'm ready to jump. I don't want to be late for this gig."
The security officer pointed to a seat, and I sat. The physician who invited me to present rushed into the building. His hair was disheveled, and his face reddened. It was good to see a real person again!
He spoke to the security officer who now had a team. I was moved to another room. After twenty minutes, the doc popped his head into the room and apologized. He said he hoped I'd return next month.
What???
The Human Resource clerk was accompanied by a nurse and security. She brought forms in triplicate. I explained that I wasn't a hospital employee. I was invited to a one hour meeting. She asked me if I wanted future invitations.
The pledge that I'd had chicken pox at age four and the state background check were the simplest of hoops. For your pleasure, I was going to detail everything she required of me, but it reads like fiction.
I will return next month with my child and adult shot records in hand. My passport and background papers are in order. I've purchased a wallet meant to hold said documents.
When I see that wallet in my home, I want to scream. It is a symbol of a much bigger bother. That wallet makes me want to dye my hair pink or get a tattoo or pierce the shit out of my face.
I hear you Monte. Keep talking!
elise — April 14, 2008
you are simply hilarious.
i hope to be like you when i grow up.
;)
Noel — April 14, 2008
This was some great writing!! I had seen the word once before on a scrabble game but never saw it used.
Porcia — April 15, 2008
A wise man once told me that sleepwalkers roam this Earth never contemplating what it must be like to question those in positions of power. Sleepwalkers, I was told, are everywhere. Education, gumption, and moxie are among the ways to combat this rapidly swelling epidemic of complacency. Thank goodness I have been wise/lucky enough to seek my education from various anti-establishment sources and courageous enough to invoke the remaining traits often and with verve. Perhaps this is why, more and more, I find myself agreeing with the dissenting judges in the case law I read. Perhaps this is also why I have never been afraid to take on the big guns for a good cause. And perhaps this is also why I felt a sort of kindred spirit-type association with the man who warned me about sleepwalkers.
Monte, have you ever seen the movie "They Live" with Rowdy Roddy Piper? It is people like you that help to place those essential and elucidating sunglasses on the noses of those who would otherwise be sleepwalkers.
~Porcia
Hoffy — April 18, 2008
That's funny. I had a similar experience in my high school library. There were 4 very comfortable chairs near the rows of computers in the library. For some reason, these chairs were reserved only for teachers, even if there were no teachers present. Needless to say, I sat in one until our Big Brother like librarian told me I couldn't. Obviously, I argued with him until I was allowed to remain. (It's scary to think that people hold onto the smallest ounce of power with a death-grip. Why do
we feel like we have to be stronger, better or more powerful than others? There's never a competition over whose nicer or kinder or more generous.)
Anyway, several months later, in creative writing class, we were
given the opportunity to write an episode of Seinfeld as a final project. Well, we included the library in the script, filmed it in the library and actually got the Big Brother librarian to appear in it as a totalitarian librarian that wouldn't allow people to check out books without handing over DNA samples and so on...
Score one for the good guys...
Hoffy
twinchlian — May 8, 2008
I knew you guys had it bad in the states, but this was acctually kind of shocking. As a norwegian I have for a long time warned my fellows that "we are all prisoners here", et cetera; but this can be quite hard to see if your eyes havent already been opened.
'Cause here, in Norway, you only get fucked if you stray to far: if you dont possess the will or ability to gain the nescessary cultural capital to play "their" game. (Or, if you are stoopid enough to attempt travel with an areoplane; then all bets, and civil rights&liberties, ofcourse, are off.)
Pulling SS-stunts on a sociology professor, who obviously knows the game, is quite unthinkable in civilized northern Europe. So if "they"
t r y to fuck with a guy like you I can only imagine the pain, suffering and degradation of the common man in the Home of the Free.
... I have asserted in many a late nigth discussion (in a provocative manner) that the U.S of A is and have been in a d e f a c t o state of civil war at the very least since the 70's: It would, dear sir, be very interesting to see a man of your credentials and tempremental disposition blogging thougths on that subject.
julia — May 31, 2008
how did I miss this? gr8 post! I only remember uni administration rules too well, our responsibility was to break them after all (wink, wink)
here is a big brother story... in Kenya at the American Embassy where I went to re-new my visa a few years ago. While lining up, someone moved towards the security check-point before the security guard "allowed" him to, and I kid you not, this man who had lined up at the Pearly Gates from 5am (it was now 9am) was sent to the back of the line. I began to say something, and was asked if I wanted to be sent home. Well, my flight to Mpls was leaving the next day, so I could not afford this luxury :(