Cross-posted at Jezebel.
Most of us are clear on the idea that patriarchies are defined by sexism: the valuing of men over women. In our American patriarchy, however, this is matched and perhaps even superseded by something called androcentrism: the valuing of all-things-masculine over all-things-feminine. We know we live in an androcentric society because masculinized things (playing sports, being a doctor, being self-sufficient) are imagined to be good for everyone (we encourage both our sons and daughters to do these things), but feminized things (playing with dolls, being a nurse, and staying at home to raise children) are considered to be good only for women.
This means that men are teased and ostracized for doing feminized things, as we have demonstrated in advertising for McCoy Crisps, Hungry Man, Solo, Chevy, dog food, Miller beer, beef jerky, cell phones, Dockers, the VW Beetle, and alcohol (see here, here, here and here).
This tendency towards androcentrism means, also, that companies can count on both women and men buying masculinized products, but only women buying feminized products. It’s smart business, then, to masculinize everything. In a New York Times article, for example, Patton reports that Mercedes masculinized its SLK in response to a finding that “too many” women were buying it, something that threatened to feminize the car:
Mercedes says that 52 percent of the registered owners of first-generation SLK’s are women and 48 percent are men; the company would prefer the figures to be more on the order of 60 percent men and 40 percent women…
The standard thinking in the industry is that lots of women will buy a car that appeals to men, but many men — certainly those who wish to avoid the girlie-men label — won’t buy one associated with women.
This logic helps explain the, admittedly tongue-in-cheek (I think), hyper-masculinization of the Honda Odyssey in this commercial, sent in by Nancy N. She writes:
The choice of the black car, the music, and lighting all direct the viewer to think, “this isn’t just a mini-van, this is a man-van, and you aren’t a pansy if you buy it.” …[It is] “technology packed “… with distinctly harder edges. Overall, Honda is trying very hard to override the notion of a “mom car” to sell to a broader audience.
See also: “how to give the perfect man hug” and “how I sit on the bus”. And for more examples of androcentrism, see our posts on the phenomenon in sports (see here and here), cartoons, schools (see here and here), and Cosmo.
Lisa Wade, PhD is an Associate Professor at Tulane University. She is the author of American Hookup, a book about college sexual culture; a textbook about gender; and a forthcoming introductory text: Terrible Magnificent Sociology. You can follow her on Twitter and Instagram.
Comments 25
TheophileEscargot — January 5, 2011
It's interesting that here in the UK Skoda used to run an ad for where they had a Skoda Fabia as a cake:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NwBE1l6QexU
But they've now replaced it with an ad for the same car as "mean" with lots of aggressive imagery of headbutts, punching, snakes etc. I suspect they to have panicked that the car was perceived as "too feminine":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BQq_Rzn-yu0
Scott — January 5, 2011
"Most of us are clear on the idea that patriarchies are defined by sexism: the valuing of men over women."
I know you didn't mean to equate sexism solely to the valuing of men over women and are using it in the context of patriarchy. However, the way it's phrased sort of sounds awkward and made me jump back for a second.
Lars Fischer — January 5, 2011
The idea that a car will drop in status if too popular with women reminded me of the observation that professions (at least here - Scandinavia) drop in status when more women practice it and that social status is all but lost if the majority if practitioners are women. Here, priest, school teacher, and doctor would be examples of this.
ow — January 5, 2011
Is there an article somewhere on why people value male dollars over female dollars even if the dollars turn out the be the same dollars? If the company's goal is to make money...then why do they get bothered that they're making money? Is it that men buy more things more often and maybe women stick with a purchase longer? Is that what they're getting at?
Jeremiah — January 5, 2011
Related, via NYT:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/04/business/04minivan.html?src=me&ref=general
"Having spent recent years making minivans more child-friendly through amenities like dual-screen entertainment systems and reconfigurable seating, the automakers are now focused on making them more appealing to adults, *especially men*, who have shied away from the vehicles and their connotations. Nearly every minivan sold in the United States has been redesigned in 2010 to offer flashier looks, more advanced technology and a sportier ride. "
Jeremiah — January 5, 2011
Complete and total derail: is there some reason we can't use basic HTML markup in the comments? Like bold or italics?
Rachel — January 5, 2011
I don't get this at all. Women buy the majority of cars in the United States; I think I remember the statistic being 60% of new cars (I'm recalling an news story from a couple years ago). If that's true, wouldn't Mercedes make more money selling more of their cars to women then to men? I think this is just marketing that is behind the times. I remember seeing an article about how women make the majority of car and major appliance/electronics decisions for their households, as well as the banking decisions, but most companies selling those things marketed to men and in stores salespersons ignored women who were with men, even though the women was making the decision. It was very interesting. A great example of cultural norms not meeting the reality of things.
Jennifer — January 5, 2011
I literally walked out of two different car dealerships because the salespeople just didn't get it because I am sex female. After telling one person I was shopping for a 5-speed, he walked me over to an automatic and told me that is what most women buy. I walked out; the dealership lost a sale. I took a male friend with me to another dealership and the salesperson kept trying to address him even though we made it clear I was the purchaser, several times, and then tried to show me the "female" version of the car I said I liked. Another sale lost. I even had a rental car agency try to dissuade me from renting a 5-speed in a rugged terrain area - because I am a woman, am I sure I could handle it? This has to do with waaay more than the bottom line of money-making. There is a gender construction being threatened....
News You May Have Missed « The Tightrope — January 5, 2011
[...] one of my favorite blogs, Sociological Images: “Making it Manly, or How to Sell a Car.” Since one of my late Christmas presents was the news that my transmission will not last the winter, [...]
The Amazing Kim — January 5, 2011
The Volvo logo uses the symbol for masculinity too (the circle with the arrow pointing out of it). I am just confused every time I see it.
"Man cars; transportation for men only" it says, "we thought of making our cars out of steak but thought that would be too subtle, so we decided to make our logo the symbol for men instead."
Femininity can’t be that bad | Meteuphoric — January 8, 2011
[...] Lisa at Sociological Images: Most of us are clear on the idea that patriarchies are defined by sexism… In our American patriarchy, however, this is …perhaps even superseded by something called androcentrism: the valuing of all-things-masculine over all-things-feminine. We know we live in an androcentric society because masculinized things (playing sports, being a doctor, being self-sufficient) are imagined to be good for everyone (we encourage both our sons and daughters to do these things), but feminized things (playing with dolls, being a nurse, and staying at home to raise children) are considered to be good only for women. [...]
Katja Grace — January 9, 2011
I responded to you at http://meteuphoric.wordpress.com/2011/01/08/femininity-cant-be-that-bad/
Kelsay — January 10, 2011
I just wanted to say how much I enjoy reading comments in which no one is calling anyone a fascist or liberal or troll. It's a really nice change and I've enjoyed the opportunity to read different ideas and viewpoints without having to comb through the name calling and slander. Thanks for being classy, Society Pages readers!
Food for Thought: Who’s being sexist NOW? « Ms Karen Au — January 23, 2011
[...] Lisa Wade at Sociological Images: Most of us are clear on the idea that patriarchies are defined by sexism… In our American patriarchy, however, this is …perhaps even superseded by something called androcentrism: the valuing of all-things-masculine over all-things-feminine. We know we live in an androcentric society because masculinized things (playing sports, being a doctor, being self-sufficient) are imagined to be good for everyone (we encourage both our sons and daughters to do these things), but feminized things (playing with dolls, being a nurse, and staying at home to raise children) are considered to be good only for women. [...]
Luca Tost — June 15, 2022
if you want to save some money when purchasing items online then take advantage of discounts that are offered by various websites such as https://www.suncentauto.com/kax.html and it will help you get extra savings on top of what is already being offered by the seller or manufacturer.