Adrienne K., who posts at Native Appropriations, let us know about the book Make It Work! North American Indians: The Hands-On Approach to History. Her friend Katie found it in the 4th-grade classroom library at the school where she teaches on the Rosebud Sioux Reservation in South Dakota:
As posted on Native Appropriations, Katie said,
The book purports to give a history of Native Americans and a guide to Native crafts, but what it ends up being is a veritable handbook for white kids to “play Indian.” All the photos are of white kids dressed up as Indians! I can’t find one picture (other than the historical ones, of course) of a Native American child. Even more disturbingly, the descriptions make it sound as if these white kids are authentic representations of Indian clothing, etc.
Katie found it particularly odd that this book was in a classroom on a Sioux reservation. Some pages from the book:
The information is often rather vague. For instance, on one page a description of the Seminole tribe says, “The Seminole were a group formed by Creek Indians and other people from different areas.” Um, ok…that’s less than helpful.
In this image, Adrienne points out that children dressed up as a Seminole and a “Plains Warrior” (?) are playing stickball, as though the game was played by all American Indian groups (rather than mostly confined to the Southeastern region of the U.S.):
As Adrienne mentions, throughout the book, only the past tense is used, as though Native Americans are relics of the past, no longer in existence (or at least, no longer interesting).
I have seen lots of books like this. In fact, I was once given a book like this when I was a kid. At the time I thought it was awesome. The books all seem to have a common theme: American Indians are part of history in the same way that, say, the ancient Greeks [note: several readers object that ancient Greeks aren’t gone, either, since there are still Greek people around–see below] are — something to study that is interesting but no longer exists. Native cultures are presented as neat art projects for non-Native kids to create, all under the guise of learning about the history of Native Americans. But as we see here, any educational benefit the books might aim at is undermined by the conflation of many different groups and cultural features into one or two generalized “Indians” who end up combining elements of Native societies that were separated geographically and temporally.
And almost all of these books present the “Plains Warrior,” as though there was a single Plains culture made up entirely of war-lovers decked out in feather headdresses. Even as a kid I wondered what a Plains Indian was, since I’d never heard of a tribe called the Plains.
Part of what is going on here is the romanticization of Native Americans as courageous, noble, but ultimately tragic figures of the past. Modern Native Americans, those living now and wearing blue-jeans and t-shirts and perhaps eating Wonder Bread as often as homemade fry bread, just aren’t interesting. They don’t fit into our romanticized narrative. They aren’t authentic. Authentic American Indians were culturally distinct…and disappeared about the time Geronimo became a member of Buffalo Bill’s Wild West show. And that makes the cultural appropriation acceptable, because it’s referring to people in the past. Creating a “Plains outfit” with burlap and a stapler is no more problematic than using a sheet to create a Roman toga.
UPDATE: As I said above, a number of commenters have asked how it’s any different to dress up like Native Americans than it is to dress up like ancient Greeks, seeing as how there are still Greeks around. I think there is a distinction. When people think about ancient Greek civilization, no one is then making Greeks who live today invisible. We do not imply that Greeks disappeared because a particular Greek society waned in influence. And we certainly don’t imply that ancient Greeks were the same as every other European civilization, with a few sartorial differences here or there. We also don’t suggest that anyone living in Greece today who doesn’t, say, worship Zeus is inauthentic, not a “real” Greek. People living in Greece aren’t stuck in time the way many people who romanticize American Indians see them.
NEW (Apr. ’10)! Jessica S. and Lucia M.M. sent in examples of “teepees” sold for fun.
First, from Jessica, a teepee by Land of Nod (a sister company of Crate and Barrell). The copy reads: “Our roomy teepee is the perfect place for peewees to powwow.”
Second, from Lucia, a teepee sold by Design Within Reach:
—————————–
Related posts: racist mascots, Canada’s “indigenous Olympics“, ice skaters dress up like aborigines, indigenous cultures in Avatar (spoiler alert), Halloween costumes, defining “Indian art”, “my skin is dark but my heart is white“, anachronistic images of Native Americans, “My Indian name is…“, the sports mascot Chief Illini, Playmobil’s Native American family, Howe Nissan dealership statue, the “crying Indian” anti-littering PSA, Italian political party uses images of American Indians to oppose immigration, and a Native American toy set.
Comments 41
technicolorsheep — April 5, 2010
Uh, I know I am treading on thin ice here, but I have an earnest question:
Gwen writes: "Creating a “Plains outfit” with burlap and a stapler is no more problematic than using a sheet to create a Roman toga."
And my question is: Is it?
Now, please hear me out – I find the book deeply problematic, even in my cultural context (Germany), and I wouldn't give it to my nephew or niece, or, if they had it already, at least explain to them that it does not represent Native American experience or history. But there are plenty of good books for children out there, so I'd rather give them one of them instead of this thing in the post.
But: At least in German culture, 'playing Indian' (meaning, the 'old' images also referred to in the book) is a very popular among children. I did it, my friends did, my elder sister, my father. It's regarded as the same as playing 'knight and dragon', or 'princess and prince', or 'soldiers', or 'cavemen', or 'beduins' (yeah, lots of towels and a very unhappy camel… er, dog. Potentially problematic, too), or 'cowboy', and so on. It's a way of being someone else, of acting out archetypal personalities in various settings, if you will. And as it's done by three-, four-, or five-year-olds, at least I see it as innocent.
Yet, innocent is not unproblematic.
I have to acknowledge that my knowledge about American Indian tribes is necessarily academic (if at all present). I've never been to the US, never met a person from any of the tribes, so … well, I'm not the best judge, really. But I understand why the book is problematic. It's creepy, it marginalises a continent's whole population, wipes out their history and identity… but a child playing 'Indian' is not doing it to represent or enact historical events. It's more of an exploration of self than an exploration of 'the Other' (or at least that's how I remember it). So:
Would you tell children that them 'dressing up' was problematic, or would you take their make-believe play as an opportunity for imparting less stereotyped views, to teach them about different cultures and then see how (and if) they integrate this into their play (though most children I've known will do so).
I strongly feel adults dressing up as Native Americans is offensive, particularly as a 'sexy squaw', etc. But I don't think it is with children.
(((And it's a lame comparison, I know, but it's the only thing that I can come up with to try and understand: Every time I see pictures of people celebrating 'German' culture (whatever that is) by donning Bavarian lederhosen and dirndl and drinking lots of beer, I feel like doing a mighty hard headdesk. But would I feel that way if my Iranian neighbour's children did the same (without the beer, though!) – Probably not… I'd expect them to learn eventually. Though, now that I think about it, would it make a difference to me if they dressed up as Nazis? I am trying to figure out how that would feel…)))
Any thoughts? I'm stuck…
Anomalocaris — April 5, 2010
"The books all seem to have a common theme: American Indians are part of history in the same way that, say, the ancient Greeks are — something to study that is interesting but no longer exists."
Isn't that true, technically? I mean, Greek people still exist too...
Lizzzzzzzzz — April 5, 2010
I'm confused about why American Indians from a hundred or few hundred years ago and Ancient Grecians is different. It is because America's history is less long ago? We don't associate what we know about ancient Greek culture/behavior/ideas with present day Greek people. Should we? I do not know the answer to this. Help?
Celena — April 5, 2010
My son briefly joined Boy Scouts, but chose to leave for many reasons, not the least of which was their portrayal of Native Americans. They had some "order of the arrow" members put on an "american indian" show for the boys... His biological father is part Nativa American and we asked if they were in contact with any local tribes or had any actual NA advisors... nope and they were not the least bit interested in it either. And sure enough, the show was beyond insulting. This book reminds me of that "show."
Tracy — April 5, 2010
I may be wrong but isn't stickball/lacrosse a Northeastern thing? Wikipedia states that the Huron and Iroquois started the game.
mercurianferret — April 6, 2010
But don't we do this when we talk about ancient Greeks as a single group of people? Depending on the period of "ancient Greece" (see, even the label groups them all into a single group) -- e.g., prior to the empire of Alexander the Great and his father, Philip of Macedonia -- the idea of a single, unified, Greece culture was not the norm. True, they shared many similarities, but also warred against each other, held different mythologies and gods in importance, held different hierarchies of power, etc.
The argument that somehow a particular Greek society waned in influence isn't exactly correct (since the kingdom of Philip and Alexander did effectively do exactly that). However, I do agree that there isn't the same sort of assumed non-existence of Greeks in the same way that is the case with Native American populations in the US (save in places where there are locally greater [and more visible] populations). Yet, trying to explain this without recognition of the changes and losses of Greek city-states of "Ancient Greece" into an empire of "Ancient Greece" (let alone the incorporation of "Ancient Greece" into "Ancient Rome") actually goes against the premise of your update.
But at the end, I agree (although I am pedantic): the difference between dressing up as an ancient Grecian compared to dressing up as a pre-"indoctrinated" Native American is something fundamental. To me, though, the connection is via philosophical connection. Living in a Western civilization, with an underlying social philosophy that traces its roots to the "ancient Greeks", when we portray ancient Greeks either in costume or in stage/film acting, it is done more out of reverence for and revelry in that shared cultural history and connection, especially when compared to non-Native attempts of dressing up in costume and recreating the past.
Shinobi — April 6, 2010
Saw an add in someone else's magazine this morning, picture of a bride wearing a full indian headdress. Ridiculous.
Shinobi — April 6, 2010
And by indian I meant Native American. Political Correctness FTL.
Pauline — April 6, 2010
Just curious, but why are Native Americans still called 'Indians'? I would have thought that term would be long gone by now. I'm Australian and ever since I got actual Indian people and Native Americans confused and had to have it all explained to me I've made a point of referring to Native Americans as just that. It seems to make sense to me.
Rose — April 10, 2010
Awww, I owned this book myself as a child. I liked it. But I was also a badass child and would certainly not have minded some actual discussion of issues mixed in with my coil pots and painted feathers.
Adrienne — October 14, 2010
The difference between dressing up as Ancient Greeks or Native Americans is the on-going power imbalance between Native Americans and the dominant culture in the US.
Native Americans were invaded and overcome by Europeans through long term systematic oppression that is now pervasive in US society. The injustice is current, not a chapter in history.
For the descendant children of invaders to be dressing up and playing with fragments of tribal cultures that were destroyed is fundamentally WRONG. Would descendants of Nazi Germans be allowed to wear traditional clothing of Eastern European Jews for play and fun? Would white children in the Deep South be allowed to dress up in the rags of plantation slaves for parties?
Yes, it's wonderful to see children's imagination sparked by playing dress up. Their minds are beautifully innocent and they cannot discern the meaning behind characters they encounter. It's OUR responsibility to teach respect and to provide age-appropriate information that tells the truth about our history, and our present.
Beatrix Muircastle — November 15, 2015
I'm a bit distrubed by the fact that most of the kids in the book appear to be mostly white.. but if they used native american kids and had better info about the tribes, is it really bad to teach kids about history in a way that reaches them? kids care about toys. if they learn how other cultures make toys and had fun thats a stepping stone. granted the history in the book could be better. but it had more info then school, when I was a kid they didn't teach much about native americans. hell I don't think the native american kids I went to school with knew much about their nations and heritages. our education system sucks. I didn't know there were cities in north america before Columbus genocided his way through the west indies. I feel cheated and lied too. in high school my history teacher focused 4 months on black history and maybe one month on native american history and she hardly knew anything because she wasn't interested. its frustrating. at least this book made a half assed effort, our school system won't even give 1/8th of an ass effort. haveing kids learn about crafts and building from the past and the lives of modern children is a good step to teaching kids respect. hell I'd be stoked if I can learn to build mound cities, that'd be freaking awesome!.
knuckles — July 24, 2016
I am currently looking for coloring pages that my almost 5 year old can use as I teach her the Seminole history from their website....came across one of these pictures in the google image search. The CA of the picture made me recoil. I'm glad it was on a website discussing why it is wrong. (Also, super hard to find anything near accurate as tools to teach young children about the Seminole Nation, but no problem with christopher columbus! ugh.)