A Back View of a Man Sitting on a Pew by cottonbro studio licensed under CC BY-NC 2.0.
Benefits of Forgiveness
Researchers have consistently found that people who practice forgiveness toward themselves and others experience significantly fewer physical and mental health problems. In concrete terms, forgiveness is associated with lower blood pressure and cortisol levels, reduced bodily pain, and fewer symptoms of depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress. Given these benefits, it is worth asking about where forgiveness comes from and who is most likely to extend it?
Social Pressure to Forgive
Forgiveness is often assumed to be a purely individual decision, a choice that communicates permission to release guilt and shame. But this apparent personal choice is rarely made in isolation and independent from our social world. In reality, expectations from friends and family, community values and norms, and social inequalities shape our likelihood of forgiving others, and forgiving ourselves.
The public reputation for being forgiving, or not, plays an important role in our reflected appraisal or our tendency to act how we feel others expect us to. For example, forgiving neighbors for transgressions is a quasi-commandment in Christianity. When it comes to forgiving oneself, however, many religious traditions teach that self-forgiveness is not ours to grant. Instead, research has highlighted the religious interpretation that forgiveness or absolution must come from a divine source.
Gender and Race
In romantic relationships, women are generally more forgiving than men and have higher expectations to forgive a male partner for serious harms, such as sexual infidelity and intimate partner violence. This gender-based norm that women should be inherently more forgiving than men, suggests a degree of social coercion to forgive a male partner – even when authentic feelings of forgiveness may be absent.
Similarly, the expectation to forgive can further victimize marginalized communities through applying social pressure to forgive systemic harms, such as racial discrimination or state violence, without adequate recognition, accountability, or repair. For instance, the historical and present day offensive stereotype of the “Angry Black Woman” functions as a means to paint Black women as overly angry and bitter in response to racism and sexism, and not as likely to forgive. Then at the system level in the United States, discussions around “reparations”, or a material atonement for nearly 250 years of race-based slavery, often include arguments for and against system-level forgiveness.
Individual and State Level Crime
Research on victims of crimes shows that the victim’s sense of justice and their evaluation of an offender’s authenticity of expressed remorse are key for their decision on whether to forgive. Victims are more likely to consider forgiveness if they perceive their offender as repentant, receive a sincere apology, and if restitution is promised and followed through on. For offenders, forgiveness therapy and other forgiveness interventions has been used as an intervention to promote self-forgiveness to limit feelings of shame and even recidivism for some crimes.
Everett Worthington and others note that large-scale forgiveness, such as after mass violence or systemic injustice, can provide the groundwork for reconciliation and peace. South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission, for instance, ritualized forgiveness as a national project, bringing victims and perpetrators together to discuss apartheid-era crimes. In Rwanda, post-genocide gacaca community courts incorporated practices of confession, apology, and forgiveness to address the widespread violence, sometimes between neighbors. Then within the United States, some Native American communities have used restorative justice circles and healing ceremonies to address the intergenerational trauma of boarding schools and cultural erasure.
These examples illustrate that forgiveness extends beyond individual choice and into the social realm. Understanding forgiveness as a social decision complicates its reputation as purely virtuous or voluntary, exposing it as a complex interplay of emotion, expectation, and future-oriented hope.