IOL Cape Argus News wrote a piece about Elena Moore’s (Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of Cape Town) inaugural lecture titled Who Cares? The Directions of State–Family Relationships in Changing Times. Moore urges society to rethink the burden of care and argues that the work of care is often invisible. With a team of 40 researchers spanning across Ireland, South Africa, Botswana, Namibia and Malawi, Moore explores how families, government, and communities share the responsibility of care. In South Africa, Moore’s team found that there are care grant opportunities, but there are also major barriers in the application process. “We all want good care,” Moore said. “But we also want just care relations.”

Elena Moore

Abdelilah Farah (Moroccan Sociologist) wrote a commentary piece for the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace explaining how Morocco’s Gen Z is developing a new protest culture. The members of Generation Z are mobilizing in an age of rapid technological expansion where they have “developed their political consciousness within a globalized digital environment.” They are departing from traditional modes of protest expression and drawing on cultural influences such as anime, video games, and contemporary music. The commentary explains that “the digital protests of Morocco’s Generation Z can be understood as primarily cultural rather than purely political acts.” Generation Z  maintains a dual consciousness of being “globally connected yet locally grounded in experiences of hardship.”

Abdelilah Farah

In an article for The Conversation, Adam Coutts (Research Fellow in the Department of Sociology at the University of Cambridge) argues that the U.K. government’s new action plan Protecting What Matters–which centers social cohesion–is weak and vague. Coutts explains that the “plan frames division through religion, identity and Islamophobia, which are outcomes and proxies, not root causes.” He offers a better framework centering “community resilience: the measurable capacity of neighbourhoods to absorb shocks, resist divisive narratives and recover from crises.”

Adam Coutts

EWTN News wrote a piece on Sean M. Theriault’s (Professor of Government at the University of Texas at Austin) researches how Pope Francis differs from his predecessors. In the study, he focuses on the Pope’s actions regarding policy, appointments, and papal trips. Theriault found that Francis focused more on issues like immigration and refugees than traditional diplomatic concerns in his papal addresses. He accelerated diversity by appointing cardinals from Laos, Sweden, and Brunei. Francis also sought to spend more time with marginalized visiting prisons and homeless centers on his papal trips. Theriault says that “in the long run, Pope Francis’ legacy is going to be far more pronounced precisely because he was succeeded by Leo, who is bringing along the whole Church and institutionalizing that vision in a way Francis just did not know how to do.”

Sean M. Theriault’s

In an article for CNBC, Danielle J. Lindemann (Professor of Sociology at Lehigh University) explains the ways watching reality TV can change your behavior. Lindemann says, “there’s a lot of research that shows people are consuming these shows more actively and, whether good or bad, learning from the shows.” Reality TV has become a staple in American culture with shows like “Love Island USA”, “The Bachelorette”, and “Survivor” averaging millions and even billions of views. Three ways Lindemann cites that watching reality TV can change your behavior include: 1) making you more, or less, empathetic, 2) influence how you perceive conflict or approach dating, and 3) foster closeness between you and other viewers of the shows you love.

Danielle J. Lindemann

The Guardian ran an article about the ways Florida sociology professors are quietly defying restrictions on teaching race and gender. Many are acting out of professional responsibility rather than defiance in order to provide students with a full rigorous education. Zachary Levenson (Associate Professor of Sociology at Florida International University) comments on the nature of the restriction saying, “What I find most concerning is that we’re in this phase now where instead of telling us what not to teach, they’re telling us what to teach.” Other scholars argue that removing examination of race, ethnicity, and sexual orientation will hollow out the field and mischaracterize the discipline. The bans are also impacting students whose identities, history, and lived experiences are being dismissed as unimportant. Faculty have built networks across all the campuses to exchange information, organize learning opportunities, and draft public statements or seek legal analysis. However, tensions are high as tenure and adjunct positions are being challenged and professors face risks of public scrutiny and censorship. In spite of the heightened scrutiny professors refuse restrictions and continue teaching, uncertain of the future of the discipline’s critical core under immense political scrutiny.

Zachary Levenson

Megan Thiele Strong (Associate Professor Department of Sociology and Interdisciplinary Social Sciences at San José State University) wrote an op-ed in the Chattanooga Times Free Press, arguing that campaigns of misinformation, exclusion, and censorship are threatening the position of sociology and sociologist. People in society are currently sociologically ignorant. The discipline is rarely taught in K-12 and is being restricted within higher education. Trump’s regime and those in power target and undermine the knowledge of the discipline using anti-public strategy to suppress and shift our culture away from important conversations about inequality. Strong argues that we need sociology in all levels of education and public space: “Talking about these injustices or expanding opportunity to discuss our shared social structure isn’t radical. It’s the ‘justice for all’ part of our pledge of allegiance.”

Megan Thiele Strong

The Daily Mississippian reviewed Amy McDowell’s (Associate Professor of Sociology and Associate Chair at the University of Mississippi) new book Whispers in the Pews: Evangelical Uniformity in a Divided America. The book is based on an ethnographic study of group culture at an evangelical church that describes itself as welcoming and inclusive. McDowell observed that people within the church community often refrained from speaking about social issues: “People don’t express their doubts, opinions or their disagreements in church spaces,” McDowell said. “People really try not to talk about that stuff.”

Amy McDowell

New research from Christopher M. Pieper (Senior Lecturer of Sociology at Baylor University) examines the ways the foundation of social life may be reshaped by the rapid advancement of generative AI, mixed‑reality platforms and the global Metaverse. To investigate the shifts in societal morality, relation, and culture Pieper worked with Justin J. Nelson (Associate Professor of Sociology at Campbell University) to develop the theory of “gamism”, a “dominant ideology of our digital future – one that makes all experiences competitive, quantifiable, commercialized and entertaining for the individual user.” This theory operates on the idea that game-like interactions will influence our understanding of self and engagement in social institutions leading to four possible outcomes: utopian, dystopian, balanced, and wild card. This story was covered by Baylor University News.

Christopher M. Pieper & Justin J. Nelson

James Densley (Professor of Criminology and Criminal justice at Metro State University) and Jillian Peterson (Professor of Criminology at Hamline University) wrote an opinion piece for The New York Times about the shift in mass shooter profile and the connection to online platforms. The profile of a typical mass shooter has shifted from a middle-aged isolated man to a younger person highly connected to online social networks. Densely and Peterson explain that both profiles are in deep despair, but younger people have been convinced “that in acting violently he or she is carrying out the only meaningful act possible in a world otherwise devoid of meaning.” Their investigation led them to a trail of online platform activity that celebrates mass murders on Tumblr, Telegram, Discord, TikTok and Roblox. The same algorithm that adjusts to your preferences now leads boys and girls to true crime communities. True crime communities take despair and turn it into a mass shooting performative script. Online platforms have flagged and taken down many of these forums, but their constant resurfacing requires more intentional change to divert attention away from mass shootings and interrupt this destructive performance.

James Densley & Jillian Peterson

In a recent public lecture, Zeynep Tufekci (Professor of Sociology and Public Affairs at Princeton University) discussed how artificial intelligence, good or bad, will bring destabilizing change. She highlighted three AI advancements that society is not prepared to handle: machines that speak like humans, AI photos and video, and AI imitating human speech. Tufekci encourages young students to start asking “tough questions” and think deeply about this age of rapid advancements in AI and the disillusion it will bring. This story was covered in Today at Elon.

Zeynep Tufekci

Ashley Mears (Professor and Chair of Cultural Sociology and New Media at the University of Amsterdam) wrote an op-ed for Le Monde, discussing how wealthy men use the normalized presence of women beside them to build ties among themselves and develop a form of capital. Mears describes the Jeffrey Epstein affair as another example of the way elite circles systematically exploit women and girls. “Far beyond Epstein himself, across male-dominated elite spheres, young women circulate through intermediaries like “promoters” − men paid to bring girls to parties organized by clubs or wealthy individuals,” Mears explains. “Their circulation is normalized and entirely visible.” In her most recent book, Very Important People, she spent 18 months going from New York to the Hamptons, from Miami to Saint-Tropez, investigating the mechanisms of this systemic circuit of money and beauty at VIP upscale clubs and jet-set parties.

Ashley Mears

Alex Law (Professor of Sociology at Abertay University) recently reviewed David McCrone’s (Emeritus Professor of Sociology at Edinburgh University) book Changing Scotland: Society, Politics and Identity for Bella Caledonia. In the book, McCrone discusses how Scotland has changed in the last three decades of the twentieth century and grounds his claim in what C. Wright Mills calls ‘the sociological imagination’–the idea that we can only fully understand an individual’s biography in relation to the wider historical changes in social structure. McCrone used this sociological framework to investigate the changing structure, politics and culture of Scotland. The book begins by outlining the patterns of social change in Scotland from 1945 to 1975 and then accounts for the social conditions that have shaped Scotland into what it is. McCrone argues that the meaning and institutions of Scotland were altered by civil society, state and nation and how that was transformed “practically and ideologically” by the 1970s caesura. The main thesis is: “socioeconomic and demographic changes since the 1970s have utterly transformed Scotland…All western societies passed through similar processes of deindustrialisation, the rise of services, demand for higher educational credentials, and the feminisation of the workforce, with populations reconfigured by smaller, privatised households living in new towns and peripheral suburbs.” Law describes the book as “eminently readable, intellectually engaging and instructive, replete with carefully marshalled facts in support of his overarching thesis about the post-war trajectory of Scottish society, culture and politics.”

Alex Law & David McCrone

Gadjah Mada University’s Donnie Trisfian released a news report on Indonesia’s democracy. In the report, UGM sociologist Dr. Arie Sujito explains how the current global instability is having an impact on national conditions such as “weakening of public ethics, rising pragmatism, and diminishing respect for humanitarian values.” Additionally he points out the two sides to the development of digital technology, one side advances in information expanding knowledge, communication and connectivity, while on the other side digital spaces have led to social fragmentation, political polarization, and the spread of unverified information. He argues that the challenge the younger generation faces is moving past mastering technology to cultivating it for “civic virtue.” Sujito argues Indonesia must shift from orientation around market demands to educational support as a way to develop ethical and social awareness: “A person’s intelligence is not measured merely by the numbers that appear, but by the character reflected behind them.”

Donnie Trisfian & Arie Sujito

The New York Times ran a story about how many couples are choosing legal  domestic partnership—celebrated with “domestic partnership parties”—over marriage and weddings. Pepper Schwartz (Professor of Sociology at the University of Washington) commented that domestic partnerships are “practical and private.” Schwartz describes that couples often “want security and something that differentiates them from living together or dating” but can be undone more easily than a divorce. She noted that Millennials, who witnessed a high divorce rate among their parents, may be cautious about marriage as an institution. 

Pepper Schwartz

EIN Presswire featured Angela Simms’ (Assistant Professor of Sociology and Urban Studies at Barnard College-Columbia University) new book Fighting for a Foothold. The book examines why Black middle-class residents in the United States–who are well positioned to thrive–struggle to sustain strong public goods and services. Simms investigates why they face challenges when following the same fiscal rules as Whiter, wealthier neighbors. She argues that ongoing government policies and business practices such as federal mortgage insurance policies, reliance on property taxes, and private investment patterns shaped these disparities in wealth.

Angela Simms

A story by The Rice Thresher features Leah Binkovits (Sociology Ph.D. Student at Rice University and a Senior Editorial Writer for the Houston Chronicle) who won a Pulitzer Prize in 2025 for a series she wrote on train safety. In the series, Binkovits used her sociological training to frame the everyday “inconvenience” Houston residents face from dangerous railroads and how it connects to a “bigger system of power and economics, history and all these courses together.” The work began receiving attention from officials after the death of a teenage boy crossing train tracks in 2024. She felt honored to be recognized by her peers with this award and wants to use her work to draw attention to Houston’s financial needs, especially since that money can help create overpasses, underpasses, and necessary infrastructure.

Leah Binkovits

Rena Zito (Associate Professor of Sociology at Elon University) wrote an article in The Conversation challenging misconceptions about Tourette syndrome that have to do with shouting curses or slurs. As a person with Tourette syndrome, Zito felt it was important to clarify the misconception that tics reveal what people really think: “In reality, tics often compel people to say or do precisely what they most wish to avoid.” She also explains that “fewer than 1 in 5 people with Tourette’s experience taboo tics, such as coprolalia — involuntary obscene or offensive speech.”

Rena Zito

Daniel Perez G. recently wrote about Zygmunt Bauman’s (Philosopher and Sociologist) work on social structures. An idea he developed “liquid modernity,” which is the belief that “nothing is meant to last” recently received attention for the way it captured his beliefs on the fragility of romantic bonds. He believes this type of modernity has exchanged stability for constant change and describes the impact this is having on romance using his theory “liquid love”. This theory explains how consumer culture and the crave for individual freedom and flexibility perpetuates the idea of having options and weakens romantic bonds. Relationships are moving away from long-term commitment to temporary arrangements. Bauman warns and cautions that the ideal of the “liquid” individual blocks personal growth by avoiding emotional pain.

Zygmunt Bauman