Does a rise in women’s earning power have benefits to marriage beyond economic stability? In an attempt to address this question, a recent New York Times article summarized some of the recent social scientific evidence on the rise of working women:
Last week, a report from the Pew Research Center about what it called “the rise of wives” revived the debate. Based on a study of Census data, Pew found that in nearly a third of marriages, the wife is better educated than her husband. And though men, over all, still earn more than women, wives are now the primary breadwinner in 22 percent of couples, up from 7 percent in 1970.
While the changing economic roles of husbands and wives may take some getting used to, the shift has had a surprising effect on marital stability. Over all, the evidence shows that the shifts within marriages — men taking on more housework and women earning more outside the home — have had a positive effect, contributing to lower divorce rates and happier unions.
The article points to demographic and sociological evidence that suggests greater marital stability and egalitarianism when a woman is more economically independent:
While it’s widely believed that a woman’s financial independence increases her risk for divorce, divorce rates in the United States tell a different story: they have fallen as women have made economic gains. The rate peaked at 23 divorces per 1,000 couples in the late 1970s, but has since dropped to fewer than 17 divorces per 1,000 couples. Today, the statistics show that typically, the more economic independence and education a woman gains, the more likely she is to stay married. And in states where fewer wives have paid jobs, divorce rates tend to be higher, according to a 2009 report from the Center for American Progress.
Sociologists and economists say that financially independent women can be more selective in marrying, and they also have more negotiating power within the marriage. But it’s not just women who win. The net result tends to be a marriage that is more fair and equitable to husbands and wives.
The changes are not without their challenges. “With women taking on more earning and men taking on more caring, there’s a lot of shifting and juggling,” said Andrea Doucet, a sociology professor at Carleton University in Ottawa. Her study, the Bread and Roses Project, tracks couples in the United States and Canada in which women are the primary breadwinners. But the dynamic is “not as easy as you’d think it would be,” she said. “You can’t just reverse the genders.”
Men, for instance, sometimes have a hard time adjusting to a woman’s equal or greater earning power. Women, meanwhile, struggle with giving up their power at home and controlling tasks like how to dress the children or load the dishwasher.
Highlighting additional sociological evidence:
Kristen W. Springer, a sociologist at Rutgers, has found that among men in their 50s, having a wife who earns more money is associated with poorer health. Among the highest earning couples in her study, a husband who earns less than his wife is 60 percent less likely to be in good health compared with men who earn more than their wives.
And despite the sweeping economic changes in marriage over the last 40 years, all is not equal. Even among dual-earning couples, women still do about two-thirds of the housework, on average, according to the University of Wisconsin National Survey of Families and Households. But men do contribute far more than they used to. Studies show that since the 1960s, men’s contributions to housework have doubled, while the amount of time spent caring for children has tripled.
And the blurring of traditional gender roles appears to have a positive effect. Lynn Prince Cooke, a sociology professor at the University of Kent in England, has found that American couples who share employment and housework responsibilities are less likely to divorce compared with couples where the man is the sole breadwinner.
Comments 12
KMC — January 31, 2010
"Kristen W. Springer, a sociologist at Rutgers, has found that among men in their 50s, having a wife who earns more money is associated with poorer health. Among the highest earning couples in her study, a husband who earns less than his wife is 60 percent less likely to be in good health compared with men who earn more than their wives."
Have the studies shown whether men have poorer health because their wives have less time to take care of them since they are working? Or because men are depressed that their wives make more money than them and as a result, are taking poorer care of themselves?
Benefits of Working Women In Marriage « Just Another OrgHead Outpost — February 3, 2010
[...] 3, 2010 by emilycf The post Benefits of working women in marriage discussed a recent New York Times article which championed the benefits of women working and having [...]
Emily — February 3, 2010
I can see why marriages where the woman has more economic independence are less likely to end in divorce. When people are told they have to fill a certain role, it starts to lead to unhappiness and resentment. This causes me to wonder how the existence of a primary breadwinner in a homosexual couple would affect the marriage. For example, in a gay couple with a child, if one man is the primary breadwinner, will the other take on more feminine tasks, such as cleaning, cooking and raising the baby? Would this assignment of gender roles negatively affect the marriage? Or in a gay couple would it be easier than in a heterosexual marriage to both work outside the home and split the household tasks?
I also wondered the effect on families when the wife is the breadwinner and the husband is a stay at home dad. Are these marriages as likely to end in divorce as those where the husband is the primary breadwinner? Or, because they are switching gender roles are they less likely to end in divorce?
Jessie — February 3, 2010
It makes sense that women who are financially independent are more likely to stay married because that means that there is additional income coming into the household. Money is one of the main reasons why people get divorced, so as more income comes into the household, there's a lower chance of there being financial instability. It would also be interesting to see if there is any correlation between more of an acceptance of wives that work and the acceptance of younger men dating older women because we tend to think of people being more financially stable as they get older.
Moms working at home — February 6, 2010
I am a stay at home mom with four children and love that I have the opportunity to watch each of my kids grow and be there to help shape their future. I have a heart for people and love to share my life and what the Lord has done.
olon — February 12, 2010
If there is less chance of there being financial instability when there is more income, then that would mean that in a stay at home dad family where there is less income there should be more divorce. Therefore we as a society should oppose men becoming stay at home dads, right?
TC — February 14, 2010
I can understand how marriages would be stronger with a more economically independent woman. To begin with, there’s already a great amount of pressure on men to support their family economically. If women are able to contribute to the economic stability of a family, there’s less pressure on the man to always be the breadwinner of the family. I think the negative aspects of the rise in women’s earning power, whether it be the stress of the reversal in gender roles or the poorer health in men (as mentioned in the study), can all be attributed to the societal belief that men should be bringing in all the money. The reason couples may struggle with this change may largely be because it contradicts the stereotype of what a household should be composed of. Our society has consistently conveyed the idea that males are the breadwinner and women are the caretakers. When this idea is challenged, there will likely be some stress involved with this change. Despite the stress that may be involved from this shift in gender roles, I believe that this rise in working women is a positive shift for both marriages and our society.
khader — February 22, 2011
i think work of woman good if she live with out children , but if she have kids must leaves here work
Dan — September 9, 2013
"While it’s widely believed that a woman’s financial independence increases her risk for divorce, divorce rates in the United States tell a different story: they have fallen as women have made economic gains. The rate peaked at 23 divorces per 1,000 couples in the late 1970s, but has since dropped to fewer than 17 divorces per 1,000 couples. Today, the statistics show that typically, the more economic independence and education a woman gains, the more likely she is to stay married. And in states where fewer wives have paid jobs, divorce rates tend to be higher, according to a 2009 report from the Center for American Progress."
What a bunch of bad information. Its surprising how people can pass off random numbers to try to prove a point, and then most people don't have the critical thinking/stats skills necessary to understand what they are reading.
The first comparison probably has nothing to do with the economic gains of women. Its comparing divorces over a time period in which innumerable things have changed. It's the correlation vs causation thing that so many people get confused about.
Then the second comparison is between women with higher education, more likely to grow up in a nuclear family, more likely to be Caucasian or Asian, more likely to live in the suburbs. Then you make the conclusion that higher earning among women is somehow affecting divorce rates.
Thanks Center for American Progress for confusing everyone.
Fran — November 22, 2022
@ KMC — January 31, 2010 ("Have the studies shown whether men have poorer health because their wives have less time to take care of them since they are working? Or because men are depressed that their wives make more money than them and as a result, are taking poorer care of themselves?")
Funny that, the alternative I thought of primarily was that the wives may be working because of their husbands' poorer health.
@ khader — February 22, 2011 ("i think work of woman good if she live with out children , but if she have kids must leaves here work") I am really glad that none of my muslim couple friends think that way, and that the new generation is generally moving away from that too. Khader should get along just fine with Olon's (February 12, 2010) superb logical fallacy.