All politicians lie, said I.F. Stone. But they don’t all lie as blatantly as Chris Christie did last week in repeating his vow not to legalize marijuana in New Jersey.
Every bit of objective data we have tells us that it’s a gateway drug to other drugs.
That statement simply is not true. The evidence on marijuana as a gateway drug is at best mixed, as the governor or any journalist interested in fact checking his speech could have discovered by looking up “gateway” on Wikipedia.
If the governor meant that smoking marijuana in and of itself created a craving for stronger drugs, he’s just plain wrong. Mark Kleiman, a policy analyst who knows a lot about drugs, says bluntly:
The strong gateway model, which is that somehow marijuana causes fundamental changes in the brain and therefore people inevitably go on from marijuana to cocaine or heroin, is false, as shown by the fact that most people who smoke marijuana don’t. That’s easy. But of course nobody really believes the strong version.
Nobody? Prof. Kleiman, meet Gov. Christie
Or maybe Christie meant a softer version – that the kid who starts smoking weed gets used to doing illegal things, and he makes connections with the kinds of people who use stronger drugs. He gets drawn into their world. It’s not the weed itself that leads to cocaine or heroin, it’s the social world.
That social gateway version, though, offers support for legalization. Legalization takes weed out of the drug underworld. If you want some weed, you no longer have to consort with criminals and serious druggies.
There are several other reasons to doubt the gateway idea. Much of the evidence comes from studies of individuals. But now, thanks to medical legalization, we also have state-level data, and the results are the same. Legalizing medical marijuana did not lead to an increase in the use of harder drugs, especially among kids. Just the opposite.
First, note the small percents. Perhaps 1.6% of adults used cocaine in the pre-medical-pot years. That percent fell slightly post-legalization. Of course, those older people had long since passed through the gateway, so we wouldn’t expect legalization to make much difference for them. But for younger people, cocaine use was cut in half. Instead of an open gateway with traffic flowing rapidly from marijuana through to the world of hard drugs, it was more like, oh, I don’t know, maybe a bridge with several of its lanes closed clogging traffic.
Jay Livingston is the chair of the Sociology Department at Montclair State University. You can follow him at Montclair SocioBlog or on Twitter.
Comments 12
drdanj — April 2, 2015
So long as it is put in with other hard drugs, treated as equal to them it by definition is a gateway drug. Disconnect it from the rest, and it no longer will be. The issue is about structure.
Bill R — April 4, 2015
Most people like to alter their mental state with drugs and many overdo it. The gateway issue is more specific to the social environment than any specific drug. Amphetamine abuse in the 50s and early 60s was more likely to be associated with alcohol abuse and wasn't really a "gateway" to pot and so on.
I'm not too interested in the rhetorical banter around legalizing pot because it seems like the ayes have it and we shouldn't be surprised to see it spread as fast at the state level as gay marriage now. Benefits include profits for business, tax growth, and fewer dollars in the pockets of back-stream low-life dealers.
I guess it'll be a win for society, although I'm not sure why we should get too excited about it.
Stel1776 — April 7, 2015
If prohibition has any effect, it makes cannabis a gateway to other illicit drugs.
The gateway drug theory, that a unique pharmacological effect of cannabis causes the use of hard drugs, has been discredited by the many peer reviewed studies which have examined it.[1,2,3,4,5,6,14,15,16,19]
If the gateway theory were to have any merit, then alcohol and tobacco would be the gateway drugs as nearly all have tried these before cannabis.[1,6] There are many factors that determine which illicit substance will be used first, including availability and culture. In Japan, where cannabis use is not popular and largely frowned upon, 83% of illicit drug users did not use illicit cannabis first.[19] In the U.S., since cannabis is by far the most popular and available illegal recreational substance, it is unlikely that you would find many illicit hard drug users who did not encounter and use illicit cannabis first.[1] This does not mean cannabis caused their hard drug use. Rather it was their pre-existing interest in recreational substances combined with their willingness to try illicit substances and cannabis was simply, and predictably, the first encountered.[3,14,19] On a related note, studies have shown that cannabinoids can help treat those addicted to hard drugs and alcohol.[4,7,18]
If anything, the prohibition of cannabis makes the hard drug problem worse. Once someone breaks the law to try the very popular and relatively safe drug cannabis, their reluctance to try another illegal substance diminishes. This is both because of their increased doubts of government honesty regarding the harmful effects of those substances as well, and their newly reduced respect for the laws against them. Cannabis prohibition also connects cannabis consumers to the hard drug market. Imagine if beer merchants also sold heroin, cocaine and meth. This is the situation that the prohibition of cannabis creates for its consumers. It places a very popular substance into these otherwise unpopular markets, strengthening them and expanding their reach. Also, with no legal recourse to resolve disputes, cannabis prohibition increases the crime associated with these markets. The promotion of the erroneous gateway theory ultimately does the public a disservice, including the hindering of intervention.[19]
Regardless, one major concern is that relaxed laws will lead to significantly increased teen usage, but this has not been the case. Legalizing medical cannabis in the U.S. has not increased cannabis usage in teens.[8,9,10,11] Even decriminalization does not result in increased cannabis consumption for all ages except for a small, temporary increase during the first few years.[12,13] Portugal even saw reduced adolescent cannabis use after decriminalizing all drugs in 2001.[17]
SOURCES:
1. Joy et al. Marijuana and Medicine: Assessing the Science Base. Institute of Medicine. 1999.
2. Morral et al. Reassessing the marijuana gateway effect. Drug Policy Research Center, RAND. Addiction. 2002.
3. Cleveland HH & Wiebe RP. Understanding the association between adolescent marijuana use and later serious drug use: gateway effect or developmental trajectory? Dev Psychopathol. 2008.
4. O'Connell TJ & Bou-Matar CB. Long term marijuana users seeking medical cannabis in California (2001–2007): demographics, social characteristics, patterns of cannabis and other drug use of 4117 applicants. Harm Reduction Journal. 2007.
5. Wen et al. The Effect of Medical Marijuana Laws on Marijuana, Alcohol, and Hard Drug Use. The National Bureau of Economic Research. 2014.
6. Tristan et al. Alcohol as a Gateway Drug: A Study of US 12th Graders. Journal of School Health. 2012.
7. Oliere et al. Modulation of the Endocannabinoid System: Vulnerability Factor and New Treatment Target for Stimulant Addiction. Front Psychiatry. 2013. Review.
8. Choo et al. The Impact of State Medical Marijuana Legislation on Adolescent Marijuana Use. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2014.
9. Lynne-Landsman et al. Effects of state medical marijuana laws on adolescent marijuana use. Am J Public Health. 2013.
10. Harper et al. Do medical marijuana laws increase marijuana use? Replication study and extension. Ann Epidemiol. 2012.
11. Anderson et al. Medical Marijuana Laws and Teen Marijuana Use. IZA 2012.
12. Williams J, Bretteville-Jensen AL. Does liberalizing cannabis laws increase cannabis use? J Health Econ. 2014.
13. Single EW. The impact of marijuana decriminalization: an update. J Public Health Policy. 1989.
14. Tarter et al. Predictors of Marijuana Use in Adolescents Before and After Licit Drug Use: Examination of the Gateway Hypothesis. The American Journal of Psychiatry. 2006.
15. Van Gundy K & Rebellon CJ. A Life-course Perspective on the "Gateway Hypothesis". J Health Soc Behav. 2010.
16. Tarter et al. Predictors ofmarijuana use in adolescents before and after licit drug use: examination of the gateway hypothesis. Am J Psychiatry. 2006.
17. Hughes C E and Stevens A. What Can We Learn From The Portuguese Decriminalization of Illicit Drugs?. Brit J Criminol. 2010.
18. Reiman A. Cannabis as a substitute for alcohol and other drugs. Harm Reduct J. 2009.
19. Vanyukov et al. Common liability to addiction and "gateway hypothesis": theoretical, empirical and evolutionary perspective. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012. Review.
Jeorge H Waters — October 7, 2021
I would like to find more information about the benefits than general reviews.
Milky Floor — October 7, 2021
I'm sure that it is impossible to judge unequivocally here, because in fact this plant is very useful and not addictive if it is not used in the way that many think. Take a look at https://joyorganics.com/types-of-cbd-products-for-pets/, there are even great treats and pet remedies. I think we should change our attitude.
Charlie Flint — October 7, 2021
Tnx you
Oliver Green — October 31, 2021
In fact, using medical marijuana to treat stress is fraught with many dangers. I have the safest and most effective solution. I recommend Blessed CBD oil to restore the nervous system, which is even able to help in the treatment of weed addiction. But only you can make a choice!
Akkerman — April 18, 2022
Cannabis is just a way to relax, it doesn't make people want to try something else. I've been growing cannabis for a while already, and I can tell you that I've never wanted to try illicit drugs. It's enough for me to plant indoor cannabis seeds, and the harvest is good enough for me to cope with stress and forget about anxiety and panic attacks.
Maximilian — December 7, 2022
I believe that cannabis should not be considered a drug, to put it on a par with such pernicious and dangerous substances as amphetamines and heroin. And it cannot become a doorway to other substances, I think this effect can arise in conditions of total prohibition, and in the absence of proper human control. I am among those people who smoke weed, but I have never had an urge to use other substances. If someone like me is in favor of conscious consumption, you are welcome to visit this store https://weeddelivery.io/product-category/edibles/cbd-pills/ . There's a great selection of varieties and they've never let me down.
Colson — July 24, 2024
When buying CBD from an online store, several key factors should be considered to ensure you get a high-quality product and a positive shopping experience. Firstly, check the store's reputation by reading customer reviews and testimonials; this can give you insights into the quality of their products and customer service. Look for third-party lab test results, often referred to as Certificates of Analysis (COAs), which verify the product's potency and purity, ensuring it is free from harmful contaminants. It’s important to review the ingredients list for any potential allergens or unwanted additives. Compare prices but be wary of significantly lower prices, which might indicate inferior quality. Verify the store's shipping policies, return policy, and customer support options to make sure they offer a hassle-free shopping experience. Finally, ensure the website has secure payment options to protect your personal and financial information. By taking these precautions, you can confidently purchase CBD products online.