Societies are permeated with visual images. This means that images dominate our lives. However, no other images confront us so frequently as advertising images. They belong to the moment. We see them as we turn a magazine page, as we drive past a billboard, and as we visit a website. However fleeting, they are powerful agents of socialization.
Sociologist Erving Goffman described and exhibited subtle features of gender displays in his book Gender Advertisements. One significant feature that he noted was the ritualization of subordination in which women are portrayed in clowning and costume-like characters. This still rears its ugly head in today’s advertisements.
According to Goffman, “the use of entire body as a playful gesticulative device, a sort of body clowning” is commonly used in advertisements to indicate lack of seriousness struck by a childlike pose (p. 50).
Images reproduced in Gender Advertisements (Goffman, 1979, p.50)
Advertisement found in a file-hosting web site:
The clownish poses represent in these images clearly remind us some photos of female hysterics taken by Jean Martin Charcot (1825-1893) who was not only a neurologist but also an artist.
Charcot was the inventor/discoverer of the female psychic affliction of “hysteria” at the Salpêtrière asylum in Paris that confined four thousand incurable or mad women. For delving into the nature of hysteria, Charcot armed himself with photography. He extensively photographed the different stages and forms of hysteria and calibrated them into a general type called “the great hysterical attack.” Charcot believed that this attack proceeds in four phases, the second of which is called clownism or so-called illogical movements.
Image taken by Charcot and reproduced in Invention of Hysteria (Didi-Huberman, 2003, p.147)
Charcot used the clowning to delegitimate so-called hysterical women, and Goffman saw such representations for what they are, a way to portray women as inferior, emotionally childlike, unserious. Over 100 years later, images of clowning women are still used to reinforce gender discrimination and position females as inferior.
References:
Didi-Huberman, G. (2003). Invention of Hysteria: Charcot and the Photographic Iconography of the Salpêtrière, translated by Alisa Hartz. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Goffman, E. (1979). Gender advertisements. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———————-
Zahra Kordjazi earned her M.A. in Teaching English as a Foreign Language, with a special interest in social semiotics, gender, visual literacy, and sociolinguistics. This post is based on her thesis, Images Matter: Gender Positioning in Contemporary English-Learning Software Applications, a semiological content analysis of gender positioning.
If you would like to write a post for Sociological Images, please see our Guidelines for Guest Bloggers.
Comments 27
Alex Lee — July 23, 2011
Women are apt to hysteria in the presence of salad: http://womenlaughingalonewithsalad.tumblr.com/
Guest — July 23, 2011
Google image "Man jumping in the air" and you'll see a ton of men "body clowning."
Anonymous — July 23, 2011
As mentioned in one of the last comment sections, this kind of posing also tends to put women in unbalanced positions, so that they're not just inferior by way of madness, but also unthreatening in that a soft poke cen send them tumbling down. Of course it could be that the unbalanced stance is a default for women in advertising, as they are almost never shown grounded.
Cocojams Jambalayah — July 23, 2011
I don't intend to argue "who was/is the most oppressed". However, as much as women were and are portrayed "as inferior, emotionally childlike, and unserious" in clowning ads, women weren't thought of as less than human as Black people (male and female) were (and still may be) thought of in clowning portrayals of "sambos".
Yrro Simyarin — July 23, 2011
So... I find the idea of the "clowning" states being more appropriate for women interesting... although just a few examples doesn't prove that - you have to show that it is significantly more prevalent for women than for men.
But I don't see how a more carefree pose inherently leads to support of a subordinate position... you could as easily say that it means that they are more open, and free to express themselves. It's the author seeing what they want to see.
Cinnamongirl2 — July 24, 2011
Very interesting post. I'm keen to read Goffman's book now.
One thing I find tiresome, is that it seems every time something is posted here as a small example of a much larger body of work, someone in the comments always rushes to say 'but this proves nothing with just a few images'. The text of this post clearly states that these images are part of a larger theory and body of work; and yet the author is expected to somehow reproduce that entire body of work in a single blog post to somehow prove its validity.
I'm not sure that these commenters understand the point of this website, or indeed the point of sociology as a whole; a source has been provided, and they are prefectly capable of going to that source if they want more information.
Trilliane — July 24, 2011
...wtf, seriously???
Sariel — July 24, 2011
I get that this is just a little snippet of the analysis done on this but.....I don't find pictures of women happy and jumping for joy to be subordinate. Is it gendered? Yes, since we raise little girls in this society to be more expressive of their emotions and you don't see as many ads with men "clowning." But does this somehow make women inferior? I just don't buy it.
Max Kingsbury — July 25, 2011
The word "hysteria" is also interesting. It comes from "hystera" or "womb" in greek. Thus, a person who is "hysterical" is acting like a person with a womb. Another example of gendered language that people are not typically aware of.
Gynomite’s Reading Room! « Gynomite! — July 27, 2011
[...] is a great piece at Sociological Images about “clowning postures” for women in advertising. I think [...]
Laura Lee — November 5, 2012
I remember a commercial for Toyota when I was a kid where the happy Toyota owners would jump in the air. I think both men and women leaped with joy. I remember it because I decided to act out the ad, landed wrong, and tore a ligament in my ankle.
common sense — March 8, 2021
This is ridiculous, I see these poses intended to seem fun or silly, and excited, happy is key. I think the author is waaaayyy off!!!!
Commercial Realism - Qualified Writings — July 5, 2021
[…] https://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2011/07/23/gendered-bodily-postures-body- […]
Topic: Commercial Realism - 5 Star Essays — July 5, 2021
[…] https://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2011/07/23/gendered-bodily-postures-body- […]
Anonymous — November 15, 2023
Your commitment to excellence is inspiring as well as your commitment is unparalleled. We are so privileged to have you in our team. Thank you!