From Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his controversial raids on and detentions of immigrants to Rush Limbaugh and his rhetoric about “feminazis,” some white men, those sociologist Michael Kimmel terms “angry white men,” are resisting perceived challenges against their masculinity and historical experiences of privilege.
In his new book Angry White Men, Kimmel has interviewed white men across the country to gauge their feelings about their socioeconomic status in a sluggish and globalizing economy as well as the legal and social advances made by women, people of color, GLBT individuals, and others. Kimmel has coined the term “aggrieved entitlement” to describe these men’s defensiveness and aggravation that both “their” country and sense of self are being taken away from them. Kimmel writes in the Huffington Post,
Raised to believe that this was ‘their’ country, simply by being born white and male, they were entitled to a good job by which they could support a family as sole breadwinners, and to deference at home from adoring wives and obedient children…Theirs is a fight to restore, to reclaim more than just what they feel entitled to socially or economically – it’s also to restore their sense of manhood, to reclaim that sense of dominance and power to which they also feel entitled.
Comments 5
#confuzzled — December 5, 2013
I would be honestly pretty surprised if a sense of entitlement wasn't observed when interviewing a lot of Americans.
Angry White Men and Aggrieved Entitlement &raqu... — January 14, 2014
[…] […]
Sam Valenza — June 9, 2014
Who are these guys that were interviewed? I doubt that they were raised to believe they were entitled because they were white, but rather because they were Americans. Sounds like left wing spineless spin to me.
Smitty Forgeron — July 1, 2014
Lol, angry white man getting angry about Angry White Men! That's so meta! And so very aggrieved and entitled.
laura — May 28, 2020
Can machismo be a result of Aggrieved Entitlement? Or a form of it?