Maryland state delegate Emmett C. Burns, Jr. wrote to Ravens owner Steve Bisciotti asking him to “inhibit such expressions from your employee.” In the letter, released by a local television station and republished by Yahoo! Sports, Burns goes on to state that “many of my constituents and your football supporters are appalled and aghast that a member of the Ravens Football Team would step into this controversial divide,” and assert that he had no knowledge of any other players taking similar stances. Burns turned to familiar ideas about sport, saying Ayanbedejo had no place in the same-sex marriage debate because such political issues have no place “in a sport that is strictly for pride, entertainment, and excitement.”
Minnesota Vikings punter Chris Kluwe did not take kindly to Burns’s request for censorship. He went on to write an open, colorful, scathing, and, many would argue, entertaining response (in clean—but hilarious—and uncensored versions) to the Maryland delegate. In his letter, originally published by Gawker Media’s sport site Deadspin, Kluwe condemns Burns’s attempts to quiet Ayanbedejo, saying that not only do politics hold an important place in sport (as evidenced by athletes’ successful work to end segregation in their sports), free speech is a protected right, and, even further, stating simply “that gay people getting married will have zero effect on your life.” He closed by refuting the politician’s note that players haven’t been talking about gay marriage: “I’ve been vocal as hell about [it.]”
Other players took to the papers and airwaves to respond to Burns, too. Ayanbedejo’s teammate (who has played with Kluwe in the past), Ravens Center Matt Birk wrote for the Star Tribune, defending his teammate’s right to free speech. Instead of backing Ayanbedejo’s beliefs, however, Birk articulately and respectfully voiced his opposition, stating that marriage should remain between a man and a woman because same-sex marriage would negatively affect the welfare of children. This time, Kluwe, too, responded in the Star Tribune, armed with facts rather than expletives. He delineated the problems he saw in Birk’s argument one by one, providing many well-honed arguments and citing various social facts, statistics, and a meta-study showing no difference between children of heterosexual and GLBT families as borne out by 17 social scientific studies. In the end, all of these players demonstrated the power of free speech, showing they had every right to be on the field of public discourse. Why should they be forced to the sidelines when they can bring their opinions and even well researched arguments to an often heated and controversial public debate—simply because they play a game for a living? It’s certainly not news that politicians (from Emmett C. Burns, Jr. to Barack Obama and everyone in between) have used sport to their advantage for many years.To follow the unfolding debates, you can find Brendon Ayanbadejo (@brendon310) and Chris Kluwe (@ChrisWarCraft) on Twitter, Maryland State Representative Emmett C. Burns, Jr. at his official state website, and information about Matt Birk (including headlines) at his official NFL player page.
Comments 7
Kyle Green — October 5, 2012
Great citing/summary. It has been really fascinating to watch this back-and-forth discussion. People often associate sports with a more conservative, heteronormative understanding of masculinity and sexuality, so it is exciting to see this conversation happening between football players. Also, Kluwe's posts have been pretty entertaining.
Kyle Green — October 5, 2012
Great title!
Letta Page — October 5, 2012
There's a lot of research that homophobia in high school sports (even contact sports) has been dropping (as Kyle Green - yes, *the* Kyle Green! - above has written about), so maybe that's filtering up as those high school players move into pro leagues. Whether they believe in codifying same-sex marriage (or denying it through constitutional amendments), the players likely have grown up and became elite players alongside gay teammates or in a less repressive environment for gay players who aren't yet "out."
http://contexts.org/discoveries/changing-times-in-sport/
I was inspired by one interview in which Kluwe compared gay rights to struggles for other civil rights and said something like in 20 years he doesn't want to look back and have his daughters see he was on the "wrong side" of civil rights for any person, so he feels it's his duty to work for equality.
doug — October 8, 2012
My favorite part of this piece, of the entire exchange, really, is how Kluwe countered Birk's argument by citing social facts and drawing upon a meta-study of 17 previous reseach publications that found no difference between children of heterosexual and GLBT families. I think the Vikings punter even linked to scholarly abstract! I don't if this says more about Kluwe's eccentricities or about how limited the public reach of our scholarly publication usually is (Kluwe commented in his original piece how you couldn't link to the actual article but the abstract told you all you need to know), but I pretty sure this is our first NFL citings ever. Anyway, here's the link to the abstract and the file citation, for those of you who are so inclined.
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15504280802177615?journalCode=wgfs20
"A Meta-Analysis of Developmental Outcomes for Children of Same-Sex and Heterosexual Parents."
Alicia Crowl, Soyeon Ahn, Jean Baker
Journal of GLBT Family Studies
Vol. 4, Iss. 3, 2008
Hoodies » Changing Lenses — October 9, 2012
[...] image prompted thoughts about social consciousness and the political voice of athletes in America (more on this recently), thoughts on Tommie Smith and John Carlos’s Olympic victory stand demonstration back in 1968. [...]
Joshua Schmidt — October 22, 2012
This is really a great retelling of the ongoing exchange between these players and politicians. I agree wholeheartedly that professional athletes have every right to be vocal in support of their beliefs. They have the same Constitutional freedoms as any other American. Countless other celebrities are more than vocal regarding a multitude of social and political issues; why should athletes' rights to free speech be limited? I was excited to see Birk's and Kluwe's respectful discourse on an issue on which they disagree so strongly. It seems as though, most of the time, anyone who expresses opposition to gay rights is attacked, insulted, and labelled as a "bigot." Consider the widespread outrage directed at Chik-fil-A president Dan Cathy after he shared his beliefs regarding this very issue. I am deeply saddened that one side of the argument is so regularly denied respect for its views. In light of this, I was glad to see Kluwe's civil response to Birk's article. On the other hand, I feel that his brutal response to Burns's letter was justified; Kluwe's obvious support of free speech for both sides is very encouraging. I was also very excited to see Birk's support of his teammate's right to express his views, although he disagreed. It is this kind of mutual respect for free speech and opposing views that is too often missing in today's political and social debates, particularly on this controversial issue.
Letta Page — December 12, 2012
Just poking around, I happened to see a post-election post on Deadspin (where Kluwe published the first, "dirty" version of his letter to Burns) that included this interesting bit:
Quietly, this was a landmark moment for athletes, too. Five years ago, it would've been unimaginable for NFL players to rally around any political cause, let alone that of gay rights. (And they did rally: Scott Fujita came out for marriage equality, as did former NFL players Michael Strahan, Michael Irvin, and Nic Harris. In August, the San Francisco 49ers became the first NFL team to sign on to the It Gets Better campaign.)
Interesting to see how many players and teams did get politically involved around an issue that "would've been unimaginable" a short time ago.