Bemoaning how Halloween has turned into an opportunity/requirement for women and girls to dress sexy is nothing new. The trend isn’t just about Halloween, however, it reflects an everyday expectation for women. Women are expected to dress in ways that reveal their body and please a hypothetical male gaze daily. Men just aren’t.
University of Akron sociology graduate student Will LeSuer took some great photographs illustrating the different expectations for men and women. The same idea for a costume is sexualized when it’s a woman in it and not-at-all sexualized when it’s a man. Notice, too, that the sizing is different. The costumes for women come in three sizes, while the men’s is usually just one size. This is because women are expected to wear clothes that reveal the shape of her body, so the exact size is more important.
You might have observed, also, that the costumes aren’t called “men’s” and “women’s.” They’re all just “adult.” So women could, if they wanted to, buy and wear the non-sexy version of the costume, and vice versa for men. And we might imagine a woman doing that. But would a guy do that? Probably only as a joke (unless they’re in a queer-safe space).
This pattern — women can dress like men, but men don’t dress like women — suggests that there is, in fact, something demeaning, ridiculous, or subordinating about presenting oneself to the male gaze. Most men feel stupid, gross, or vulnerable when they do it. This isn’t just about conformity to different gendered expectations. If it were just about difference women would feel equally weird dressing in men’s clothes. Instead, when women adopt masculine ways of dressing and moving, they often feel empowered.
So, when men do femininity they feel ridiculous and when women do masculinity they feel awesome. This is what gender inequality looks like.
Lisa Wade, PhD is an Associate Professor at Tulane University. She is the author of American Hookup, a book about college sexual culture; a textbook about gender; and a forthcoming introductory text: Terrible Magnificent Sociology. You can follow her on Twitter and Instagram.





Comments 53
Progressive — October 29, 2011
Camo Cutie is hot!
Laramie — October 29, 2011
I was going to suggest a post like this. Nice to see you've done it anyway.
Seth Eag — October 29, 2011
I never noticed the issue of the sizes before. Very interesting. Still, if the research were done, I'd imagine more men have fetishized dressing like women in sexual settings than the other way around. A strange contradiction.
Luis Carlos Corado Guardado — October 29, 2011
I do wonder if the fact that men are uncomfortable with wearing women's clothes isn't more related to society's standards? After all, men will be accused (by both men and women, and oddly enough, women ofter are the more incisive in that trend) of being "queer" or "effeminate", terms, which society has made be associated with negative perceptions. The fact is, that many heterosexual males will feel emansculated and ridiculed by remarks and jokes, and it's a cultural phenomenon, in which both sexes play a big part.
chickadee — October 29, 2011
I'm still working on finding the least alluring item to, uh, "sexificate" for my costume. So far I've got it boiled down to either fire hydrant, roll of sod, toilet snake or owl pellet.
Missmaia — October 29, 2011
I noticed the same phenomenon on my Facebook page the other day. A friend of mine is having a child, and currently the gender is unknown. She posted a photo of a pair of "boy's" socks beside a pair of "girl's" socks, and asked which pair she should buy. The general consensus was that she should buy the boy's pair, because "if it's a girl she could wear them, too." That the reverse was possible was never even mentioned.
ElectraDaddy — October 29, 2011
In the mid-70s, I was told by my second grade teacher that I must be mistaken about what my mother did for a living. "Honey, she must be a nurse. Women cant be doctors." So, I give them credit for making the female Dr. Shots instead of Nurse Shots. But, the whole thing is degrading & depressing nonetheless.
Brian — October 29, 2011
This pattern — women can dress like men, but men don’t dress like women —
suggests that there is, in fact, something demeaning, ridiculous, or
subordinating about presenting oneself to the male gaze. Most men feel
stupid, gross, or vulnerable when they do it.
Any feminist analysis of the rhetoric here should catch the trick - after talking about how the expectations are imposed on women, when we come to talk about men, all of a sudden the passive voice is trotted out, and things just happen. Men aren't made to feel stupid or gross, they just do.
Which is rubbish. When I dress scantily, everyone around me tells me my body is gross, demands that I cover up, etc. Because I'm a man.
anon — October 29, 2011
You do realize that women could just buy the male version if they want to be covered. They don't have to wear those costumes. That's the beauty of a market economy.
Tom Megginson — October 29, 2011
My concern is how much of this pressure to do a sexy costume comes from the current culture of women. Sure, men encourage it by their reactions. But there is definitely an even greater concern over looking sexy among Millennial young women than I remember from the 90s.
Anonymous — October 29, 2011
I think it's definitely a positive (for women) that the women's costume's come in more sizes. Most popular women's costumes, I feel, come in at least s-m-l, and a lot have xs-s-m-l-xl and plus sizes. It's uncomfortable wearing the wrong size in any type of clothing, aside from maybe a soft cotton t-shirt, particularly these packaged costumes which are made as inherently uncomfortable material.
I think a bigger issue isn't the costumes themselves, but the pressure for ALL women's costumes to be "sexy." I can't get behind the backlash against all sexy costumes; I like some of them, they're fun to wear, and like I said, the less of that itchy fabric touching me the better. But, some sexy costumes make no sense; who hasn't seen that cracked article with things like "Sexy House?" (The building, not the TV doctor) And I do see men in sexy costumes fairly often. But I remember in the past searching for costumes, and EVERY women's costume seemed to be a revealing version, with two exceptions: enormous punny monstrosities (plug and socket, mustard bottle, whatever) or bar wench....available only in sizes 12-16. It gave a clear message that any woman who was over age 12 and under size 12 needed to be half naked. In the last year or two I HAVE seen a backlash, with more sexy costumes in plus size and a few more costumes in women's sizes that aren't based just on the idea of "skin showing" (though I guess it depends on someone's definition of a sexualized costume; a lot of them are much more modest at the very least). It's like there's a rule: women can't be cute or scary on halloween, just sexy and MAYBE funny. And then there's a lot of pressure within groups. I'm in college, so a lot of girls are going for the sexy or cute costumes (myself included, ngl). But while a lot of those costumes are what you posted (sexy, but not terribly different than what someone might wear to any other nightclub or party), there also tended to be a lot of girls in underwear and ears. I thought that was a joke from Mean Girls when I first saw it, but at some parties, the playboy bunny is the least revealing costume there. These are usually the parties where the guys attending are the type who won't even go for funny or cliche costumes at all, let alone make fun of themselves with sexy costumes, so there's definitely more subtle gender roles in play.
Boner Killer — October 29, 2011
It is because femininity, especially the fuckability-mandate version of femininity keeps women subordinate. Women can't be scary or awesome on Halloween, we are only around to induce boners. It is unfortunate we are seen as nothing more than holes on legs. Capitalism loves sexism. It really does.
Chrissy Barney — October 29, 2011
I've found a great resource for women who are tired of the "Sexy (insert randomly selected not-at-all-sexy item here)" costumes- http://takebackhalloween.org. It's full of interesting ideas and info, from queens to goddesses to inventors and entrepreneurs.
Caroline Brunet — October 29, 2011
Ahh, so true. The male gaze is at work everyone, it seems! Also notice that the people photographed are white or light-skinned... this does only speak about sexual difference and gender equality, but also racial difference and racism... UGH.
http://thefeministajournals.blogspot.com/
Dirka — October 30, 2011
Umm.. the smartest man in recorded history said it quite well, the greatness of a young man is his strength, and an old man his grey hair. Men aren't percieved to be great if they look weak. That's pretty much a fact. Women are percieved to be great if they look weak, submissive, and ready to do what a man wants. Its pretty well been a fact of life sine I AM has been tinkering around.
Stephane T — October 30, 2011
One size only for men... This is what gender inequality looks like...
Yrro Simyarin — October 30, 2011
There's an underlying assumption that a "sexy" costume for a man
would be the same as for a woman. Anyone designing a sexy man's costume
for the female gaze isn't going to put in a low neck and a short skirt.
They'll do something that emphasizes their shoulders, waistline, and
biceps - because strength is to male sexiness as thinness is to female
sexiness.
No one looks at a costume of Kratos from God of War
(https://www.google.com/search?q=kratos+costume&hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=AGC&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&biw=1920&bih=918&prmd=imvns&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=-1etTtfyM5SksQKJzKjjDg&sqi=2&ved=0CFIQsAQ&uss=1#hl=en&safe=active&client=firefox-a&hs=Mbr&rls=org.mozilla:en-US%3Aofficial&tbm=isch&sa=1&q=kratos&pbx=1&oq=kratos&aq=f&aqi=g10&aql=1&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=6499l6609l0l6905l2l2l0l0l0l1l181l320l0.2l2l0&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=9c863f4a8ed0655c&biw=1920&bih=918)
and says that the men wearing it are being subjected to the female
gaze because they're running around in nothing but a short kilt. But
there's no way a man who isn't that muscular archetype is going to try
to wear that costume - they'll be laughed out of the building.
Also, my general impression from talking to girls who wear "sexy"
outfits is that they enjoy being able to "flaunt it" once a year without
being judged too harshly. There's definitely a power in being able to show off like that - if I ever work up the chest muscles to wear that Kratos costume, I'm sure as hell going to.
Toby — October 30, 2011
Well I'm not sure about this argument at all. First off as you point out anyone is free to buy the non sexualised outfit... nothing is imposed. Secondly I can't help but notice that the only sexualised outfit on offer is designed for a woman's body ... strangely enough I suspect that at 6.2 I might not fit them and secondly my cup size is not exactly generous nor are my sexual characteristics situated in the same place as a woman's... Indeed I'd like to echo Brian in pointing out that one of the reasons I don't 'dress sexy' is that there is little provision made for me to do so and society enforces its own negative roles on me if I do so (women in fact have more freedom here). I do not feel that I would be inferior dressed as a woman only that would be dressed as something I am not (like an elephant in a rabbit costume)... If some women feel more empowered dressing as men then that says more about their own view of themselves than any male sexism (I don't think more or less of them). Also there are plenty of men who feel more confident and powerful dressed as women (Eddie Izzard for instance.) I'd also like to take issue with 'the hypothetical male gaze' there are men and women that appreciate the female form and no one is being forced to dress in any way merely given the option... If the marketing was not working these outfits simply wouldn't be offered. As many female friends have assured me they basically dress for themselves not men and I find it a bit patronising to question their motives. I can only say that while I would not dress as a naughty nurse I'd totally don a cod piece for Halloween if afforded the opportunity so perhaps the question should really be why there isn't an outfit that allows for the proper display of the male body/sexuality... We could have a neutral outfit and two sexier outfits for either sex (should they so choose) why is my only option to wear a pinging neck line designed for another sex to champion equality? Could it be that the reason male sexuality is not so encouraged is that it is seen as more aggressive or disturbing... certainly I pick up a bit of that in the phrase "the male gaze".. Perhaps I am being too sensitive but then we have entered into a discussion of the possible implication of offering someone a sexy outfit to wear... My take on this is that anyone who wants to dress scattily (though obviously not obscenely) should be allowed to. If anything I find questioning that choice in adults (though not kids!) a bit patronising... are you saying you've spotted this phenomenon and the provocatively dressed women haven’t? let's err on the side of respect and presume that these women know what they are doing and why they are doing it (they wouldn't make these costumes unless people bought them and there is nothing wrong with men and women admiring each other's bodies... it's kind of how we got here.) Taken from another angle I might say the sexism lies in the fact that as a man I get the choice of only one size and no sex aproprate option if I feel like being a bit risqué. Appologies if I have missed the point some how but this is how I feel about the issue.
Nobilis Reed — October 31, 2011
The fact that it is acceptable for women to dress as men, but it's unacceptable for men to dress as women, also suggests that women have greater freedom than men do.
Albert — October 31, 2011
I just read a great column on this very subject, saying Halloween should be a celebration on sexuality and being proud of your body, although now it tends to only sexualize women, men not wanting to be subject to a 'male gaze', which would be totally gay (the thought alone!). I understand and support the criticizing of these skimpy outfits for girls, but the article is an interesting viewpoint I think. You can read it here:
http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/happy-heteroween/Content?oid=2594616
Tina — October 28, 2013
Dr. Ms Wade,
Men also do not -as a norm- wear eyeliner, mascara, blush, foundation, lipstick / gloss... as seen on the bottom picture of the "http://thesocietypages.org/
John Thomas — August 12, 2014
Pure and simple, women's bodies are more attractive to look at by men and women. This does not immediately imply that there is something demeaning about men looking at a woman in a skimpy outfit marketed at women with the alternative for men being a plain outfit.
All these products you identify as inequality to women is "what people want". Women want to be smart and attractive, men want to smart and strong. It's how we've evolved as a species.
Real women who strive to be smarter and more attractive in so called traditional roles are the ones in control. These are the ones that men bow to. This feminist garbage is for those who will soon be out of the gene pool. Fighting natural selection rather than furthering it will mean you will die old and childless. You will have no children to carry on your argument.
Forcing little girls and boys to be the opposite of what they naturally feel is so off track.