This was originally posted on Girl w/ Pen on December 8th. Adina Nack is an associate professor of Sociology at California Lutheran University and the author of Damaged Goods: Women Living With Incurable Sexually Transmitted Diseases. ..
*Spoiler Alert: in order to critique this show, I need to reveal some plot points.
Zombies do not discriminate on the basis of sex, race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, or ability…people do. This sad truth played out in the short but compelling 6-episode first season of AMC’s new show The Walking Dead. Zombies eat any living thing they come across – scary but not evil creatures because they don’t have a functioning brain which would allow them to be human, to distinguish right from wrong.
The living human characters, on the other hand, do have the cerebral capacities to be moral or immoral, act selfishly or with compassion, believe and act in ways which show they believe all humans deserve equal rights. And, that’s what made the series interesting to this feminist sociologist.
Disaster scholars have often noted that privilege (often based in being white, male, heterosexual, of higher socioeconomic status, physically and mentally healthy, etc.) still plays out when natural or human-made disasters strike.Girls and women, in particular, often suffer in sex-based ways when anomie strikes, when norms disappear and laws become meaningless in a ‘post-apocalyptic’ society.
Admittedly, I haven’t read the graphic novels of Robert Kirkman, on which this series is based. So, I’m not 100% sure who to credit for the plot twists that portrayed the violent racism of a white supremacist, the vulnerability of daughter and wife to a physically-abusive man, and the terror of a woman fighting off a former lover who is trying to rape her.When the hospital is invaded by “walkers” (a.k.a. zombies), the living soldiers choose to execute ill and disabled patients rather than try to rescue them. [Mind you, the zombies do not seem to move fast enough to cause problems for someone armed with a semiautomatic weapon, but the choice is still made to sacrifice these lower status people.]
If a common enemy should unite, then social scripts of bigotry and bias should disappear. As one character notes in the season finale, human beings may have reached their point of extinction. The question is whether the zombies or our own human failings are to blame.
With record ratings, the Wall Street Journal and other sources report that this Sunday night’s finale attracted 6 million viewers. I may not be the typical fan of this show, so I wonder: will most viewers remain focused on the horror of a gruesome, fictitious zombie epidemic? Or, are there others like me, who despite flinching every time a zombie lunged for a bite of human flesh, left the season finale feeling acutely aware of the very real pandemic that plagues almost all societies: that potent combination of bigotry and selfishness which manifests as one of the many ‘isms. I’ve yet to see a ‘walker’ lurching down a street, but I have encountered far too many living human beings who lack empathy, respect, and compassion for each other and for the diversity of life on this planet.
Comments 2
Fernando — December 9, 2010
So, I’m not 100% sure who to credit for the plot twists that portrayed the violent racism of a white supremacist, the vulnerability of daughter and wife to a physically-abusive man, and the terror of a woman fighting off a former lover who is trying to rape her.When the hospital is invaded by “walkers” (a.k.a. zombies), the living soldiers choose to execute ill and disabled patients rather than try to rescue them.
None of this was on the comic books so I guess Frank Darabont is to thank maybe?
P — December 26, 2010
They need to put a husband beater on the show... even things out a bit. Then again, in the absence of law physical advantage matters a lot more, so I imagine male domestic partners would be more violent than female ones... as opposed to the way things are now where women are on average more violent in domestic relationships.
It's a weird world. Cultural conventions and traditional understanding of how violence and power works do not always reflect reality. Please click the link below for more information.
http://pn.psychiatryonline.org/content/42/15/31.2.full