The NYT’s Bits blog introduces us to unvarnished, a site where you can “review” another person anonymously.
Here is how it works. For now, you must be invited by an existing user, and to formally register, you must first write a review of that person. Any member can review any other member, and if someone does not have a profile on the site, you can create one for them without their permission.
The person being reviewed has very little control over what is written; they cannot delete a review, but can offer a written response, or perhaps ask their friends to contribute more positive portrayals.
Facebook has a similar application called Honesty Box that allows you to leave anonymous assessments of those with a facebook page. I guess this application brings the scathing critque “straight to you”!
My initial impression is that no good can come of this. It does raise the question how we perceive our digital obligations onlines. Ilana Gershon gave a great talk at the MaCarthur Foundation’s 2010 Digital Media and Learning conference I attended last month in San Diego. Her talk was called “Keepin’ It Real: Facebook’s Honesty Box & African-American Verbal Artistry.” The gist of the talk was that there were key differences in how White and Black students viewed “honesty box.” While White students Many white students saw the app as an unwelcomed opportunity to “say mean things” while African American students preferred to know if people out there had negative assessments about them.
While I haven’t read the paper, it brings up an interesting puzzle for me. Should I confront negative assessments of me on the part of anonymous others. For example, before this post, I had no idea if I am on Rate my Professor.com. I didn’t want to know. But since I was writing this post, I went on anyway and got this:
a really stand up prof! used the book a little but the majority of the work was online. he is funny and can ignite class discussions that make going to class a joy. go to this class and feel free to voice your opinions. marichal is one of the best teachers at cal lutheran.
Whew! So far so good. But then I also got this.
he never followed the syllabus so it was insanely confusing! He made it sound like we were going to cover all kinds of relevant current events, but we stayed on one topic for almost 6 weeks. By the add/drop dealine, there were NO grades in the gradebook. We were let out of class late everyday.
Ouch! But here’s the thing…is the anonymity liberating students to be authentic and thus confront me with at the very least a valuable perspective on my strengths and shortcomings or is the anonymity a unwelcomed invitation to “be mean.” If the web affords us these venues to give unsolicited and unattributable assessments of others, then how should we be in these venues? Do we give them over to spiteful nastiness? Do we try to steer them towards “authentic” critique?
Comments 4
Kenneth M. Kambara — April 1, 2010
I think the NYT Bits blog needs to get out more and try to be ahead of a trend for a change, but maybe I'm just being mean. Seriously, unvarnished makes LinkedIn seem exciting and sexy.
The Internet feeds a Lashian culture of narcissism that's heightened by the fact that there is no privacy. We're all naked out there and conditioned to really care what people think about us. Much of this talk about Honest Box reminds me of so much high school style politics and while anonymity allows candor, it invites nasty potshots. Comments on news articles are a perfect example of people often shouting at each other and trading insults.
Not to put you on the spot, but do you find anonymous comments valuable? I think the signal to noise ratio is pretty low. I mean, are we really just talking about a generalized affect in many cases? I've found that double blind peer review and anonymous ratings to be thin on value, overall, but there are exceptions.
Deaf Indian Muslim Anarchist — April 1, 2010
I don't understand the point of Honesty box. I don't want one and if people want to talk shit about me, then they should say it to my face. Come on, don't be a coward and hide behind the computer screen.
Also, I don't understand why people think it's OK to be mean.
There's a difference between being honest and being mean. OK, if someone says I have a short temper or anger issues and that I need to work on it, that's fair. But it's not cool if someone calls me a "dumb bitch."
Monica Hamburg — April 5, 2010
I think being Anonymus gives people the opportunity to phrase even their legitimate opinions in an inconsiderate and scathing way. Were they obliged to attach their name (and all the reputation that may go with it) to a comment most likely the comment wouldbe more tactful and constructive.
Psychology and Social Media (Part III) – on OneDegree: Anonymity « Me Like The Interweb — June 2, 2010
[...] Recent occurrences have once again thrown this issue into the spotlight. There are, as just a few examples, a court case which requests the unveiling of anonymous posters who made defamatory comments, a newspaper which revealed their discovery that the anonymous comments on their site which were “disparaging a local lawyer, were made using the e-mail address of a judge who was presiding over some of that lawyer’s cases”, Anonymously authored blogs exist, as do as skewed Amazon reviews made under a pseudonym and social sites or applications that encourage anonymous feedback. [...]