I present you the 193% chart.

So this one’s easy to mock. But I’m often frustrated by my inability to get my students in political science to recognize how important statistics and data presentation are to politics and power…and this is coming from a qualitatively inclined scholar. I think part of it is because we fail to treat statistics as a discourse. I may have enchantment on the brain (see Brian Rasmussen’s and Don Waisenan’s posts), but it seems like we either imbue statistics with an mystical, impenetrable quality above everyday conversation or we treat is as an illegitimate discourse easily manipulable by elites. This makes them either reject it or embrace it Kool-aid style. There needs to be a sweet spot in our public life between viewing statistics as somehow separate from everyday discourse and viewing as an illegitimate discourse (i.e. the language of Sarah Palin’s famous New York elites).

Here’s the video. Isn’t there a WTF moment as this guy is reading the prompter?

HT: Flowing Data