So, I never blogged a follow up to the Canadian election in October. The Tories (Conservatives) won with Stephen Harper as Prime Minister. The Liberals were licking their wounds and their leader, Stephane Dion (no relation to Celine), looked like he was on the way out.
Canadian politics is usually fairly bland (although, what do I know, eh?), ever since Pierre Trudeau left office. Part of the political lore up there is Trudeau’s “fuddle duddle” incident, where he mouthed obscenities to the shock and horror of those on the business end of such conduct:
Well, things are heating up and it all started with Stephen Harper riling the other parties by threatening to cut Federal public campaign funding, framed as a cost-cutting manœuvre. Apparently, he didn’t learn from an earlier gaffe when his office went on record as supporting arts funding cuts in early autumn. So, the perception has been building that Harper’s approach to solving financial woes is to cut funding to constituencies that don’t support him anyway.
When I was in Toronto last week, there was a huge buzz about the Liberals, NDP, and the Bloc Quebécois forming a coalition with the intent of ousting Harper. He backed down on the campaign financing cuts, but it was too late. Worries about the economy, which ironically helped the Conservatives win in October, fueled the opposition’s lack of confidence in Harper’s budget and economic plan in Parliament.
In just seven short weeks, Harper went from leading a minority government (plurality of seats, but not a majority), to being on the verge of getting ousted through a “no confidence vote,” which would effectively unseat him as Prime Minister. What to do, oh what to do? Would Harper be accused of crying to “mama and to television,” as Trudeau accused the Tories of in the early 70s? What to do, indeed!
Lock the doors!
In a strange twist, he convinced the Governor General, Michaelle Jean, a role that is usually just ceremonial (tip of the hat to the UK monarchy), to suspend Parliament until the end of January, giving Harper time to stall a “no confidence” vote and to create an economic stimulus package. This quote from an AP article notes:
“A governor general has never been asked to suspend Parliament to delay an ouster vote when it was clear the government didn’t have the confidence of a majority of legislators.
‘There is no precedent whatsoever in Canada and probably in the Commonwealth,’ Constitutional scholar and Queen’s University political scientist Ned Franks said. ‘We are in uncharted territory.'”
With Parliament suspended, the coalition cannot form and how Harper and the Conservative MPs (ministers members of Parliament) are scrambling on a massive PR blitz to gain support of the people. Some might argue that the suspension is anti-democratic, while others are saying that it was unlikely that a stable coalition government could be formed by the Liberals (centre left), New Democrats (socialist), and Bloc Quebécois (Quebéc nationalists).
Of course, as someone from the US, I find all of this Governor General (GG) stuff odd. My thoughts for a while have been to wean off the monarchy thing, particularly in light of Quebéc separatism sentiments.
It’s one thing to have QEII, but does Canada really want Charles’ mug on the legal tender? Although unlikely, what if it came to this character as UK head of state?
I’m rather curious about how this turns out…
Comments 4
Lindsay — December 4, 2008
Not bad. Kind of an embarrassing slip referring to MPs as Ministers of Parliament. (Duhr, they're MEMBERS!) And, ouch, we've been bland since Trudeau left office? Jeez, that's 24 years of cornflakes and boiled dinner!
I find it ironic that everybody here (and even there - we got a mention yesterday on Huffington Post!) is so excited about this. Canadian politics have always suffered from this sort of stuffy legalism. Another constitutional debate... it's ho hum business as usual.
I am not surprised Michaëlle Jean decided to perogue Parliament until the new year. While I count myself amongst the 62% MAJORITY who do not want a Tory-led government, I think things are moving very fast right now and maybe we should have a cooling-off period to allow the potential coalition to put together their plans and see if they really can run a stable government. They can still bring the Tories down in January; hopefully they will be better prepared to do it.
PS Hail Harry!
Marcel — December 4, 2008
This whole thing is farcical. My roommate and I were chatting about how all of this must seem to you, our neighbours to the south and that it would be seen as a sign that our system does not work. However, I urge Americans, particularly those disgusted with the last 8 years of Bush, to ponder how this may have saved you all from his reign of terror. Though our system may seem flawed, it has managed to save us from the proposed cuts (not just the Federal subsidy issue, but also barring public servants from striking and selling of Canadian assets as well as other initatives designed only to help Conservatives maintain their tenous power), a blatant attempt by Harper to crush any political opponents and instill the will of the Right upon us.
While I'm not 100% happy with the Governor General's decision to allow Harper to suspend Parliament until Jan 27th, I accept that she has made a choice that she believes is the right one. An unfortunate possible side effect of her decision though, is that governments will now be able to simply go crying to Her Majesty's representative and get a reprieve, should they lose the confidence of the House.
Canada was in something of a similar situation back in 1926, where a coalition government was put in place as the Conservatives in power had lost the confidence of the House, rather than putting us into another election. If you do a search for "King-Byng Affair", you can find more details. We also had an unofficial coalition during Trudeau's reign, where the NDP worked with the Liberals to ensure the Liberals could make it through. I imagine there is not a lot of mention of this particular coalition as it was unofficial and some might view it as tarnishing a person many here view as our Greatest PM ever.
In regards to the current situation, much as I dislike Harper and the Conservatives, I was not looking forward to having Dion as our Prime Minister. The country (including those who did not vote) sent a clear message that they did not want Dion to be our Prime Minister. I understand he has difficulty speaking the other Official language of our country, English, but even Chretien was able to overcome the difficulties of his childhood palsy to be a dynamic speaker. Watching Dion stumble through his speeches does not invoke confidence. I feel as though we were going to be trading one leader whom many in the country do not have the confidence of, for another.
With this almost 2 month reprieve, the Liberals need to step up their leadership bid so that, should the Jan 27th budget still not be acceptable to the Canadian people, they, and the coalition that was just formed, stand a chance to stop the madness of the Blue Sweater Brigade and their systematic dismantling of Canada.
In regards to the necessity of a Crown representative in the form of the Governor General, I was recently of the same mind as you, wondering why, if we are supposedly masters of our own house (to steal a line from the separatists/sovereignists) do we need a representative of the British monarchy? This current political turmoil has shown to me the importance of the role. Without a Governor General, there would be no person who is not dictated by partisanship, to help come up with a viable solution. There was an article released just after this past American election (can't remember where I saw it), that talked about how the President is essentially your country's monarchy and why this is a problem. Having the Governor General saves us from this.
Of course, her decision is only going to delay the inevitable. Harper has continued to attempt to run a majority government while he only has a minority. It's only a matter of time before he has to face the music and pay for his treason. The man won by lying to his own supporters. He believes that by putting on a comfy sweater, Canadians will fall for his BS.
One option that the Governor General could have taken, which didn't seem to get much or any mention, was to ask Harper to find a suitable replacement for leadership within his party. I imagine, had this been asked of him, he's ego would likely not allow for it. Not only that, but this likely would have seen the right splitting again, as he was the only person able to bring them together in the first place.
The funny thing is, had this been the GG's choice, Harper might have gone down as one of our best PMs- First he managed to unite the right, then he brought the left together as well as getting the Bloc to work with Canada(!!!), only to have the right ripped apart. That would have been an amazing parliamentary hat trick.
As it stands currently, we'll just have to wait until January 27th to see the finale.
Rick — December 4, 2008
Well, for those who are perhaps a little bit illiterate at what's happening here, or just supporting the coalition because you "don't like Conservatives", here are the latest numbers:
Breaking: New polls show huge Tory gains:
Ipsos CPC 46, LPC 23, NDP 13, BQ 9, GPC 8
Ekos CPC 44, LPC 24, NDP 15, BQ 9, GPC 8
Whopping 62% "angry at Coalition"
Conservatives are showing huge support, and those in the "coalition" have dropped a lot. 62% are angry at the coalition.
More or less, the coalition is comprised of three guys who could never have dream of holding a leadership post on the national stage. This was their only way to have their 15 minutes of fame. Of course, I'm proud as anything that most Canadians have seen through their plan and each will pretty much be hitting the street soon.
Their might be an election in new year, but I'm guessing the coalition will be long gone by then (they're already starting to fight and splinter). If there is, then I'm guessing the Conservatives will win a firm majority as they have shown to have the cool head in all of this.
ThickCulture » Identity Politics & Learning from Bloc Québécois — July 29, 2009
[...] tend to be unstable. Indicative of this, the Conservatives had a scare last December when Stephen Harper angered the other parties, bringing the country to the brink of Constitutional crisis. Recent polls in Canada showed that [...]