Barbie has never exactly been a feminist icon, but last week Mattel was celebrated for a new advertising campaign that some say empowers young girls. In the “Imagine the Possibilities” commercial, the viewer sees young girls in professional settings — a science museum, a veterinary office, a soccer field — where they lead adults as if they are the ones in charge. At the end of the ad, the scene shifts to a girl acting out her role as a college professor with Barbie dolls in her bedroom. Across the screen flashes, “When a girl plays with Barbie, she imagines everything she can become.”
But does the Barbie commercial really send an affirmative message about women in male-dominated occupations? And how does it stack up against actual Barbie products?
To answer the first question, I invite you to watch the commercial with a special focus on how the adult observers treat the young girls who are acting out their career fantasies. From the very first scene, everyone the girls encounter has the same reaction: laughter. The idea that these girls can fill the roles they’re imagining strikes the adults as so silly that the only complete sentence any of the adults says to these girls is, “You’re kidding.”
The girls are cute or funny, but never a force to be taken seriously. While the storyline may seem to encourage women’s participation in the labor force, the laughter throughout the commercial suggests that the girls’ aspirations are seen as adorable or silly.
Is it just because they’re kids? I don’t think so. Compare the Barbie ad to toy commercials that target boys. The clearest example I found was the commercial for the i-Que Robot. Like in the Barbie commercial, children take the central speaking roles as adults react to them. Unlike the Barbie commercial, these adults appear captivated and impressed by the boys’ pitches about their toy. By the end of the commercial, it’s easy to imagine these boys as successful salesmen or engineers, everyone has already treated them as such.
Does Barbie back up their message, though, with actual opportunities for play? My quick search on Amazon for the phrase “Barbie office” was pretty disappointing. The commercial, in other words, is disingenuous; it’s out of line with the actual Barbie products available for purchase. After limiting the results to only those produced by Mattel or Barbie, the only office settings I found were a pediatrician’s office and a bright pink veterinary office — which are both associated with stereotypically feminine careers — and a post office that was discontinued in 1995.
There was also a computer and desk intended to be placed in a home setting. From my search for “Barbie office,” I more commonly found career sets for Ken than viable work-oriented play sets for Barbie. Given the options, I find it hard to image how Mattel sees girls playing with Barbie the way the newest ad suggests they might.
As it turns out, Barbie’s new advertising campaign is just the latest in a long string of commercials that try to go viral by appealing to feminist audiences. I would be more impressed if the ad made girls aspiring to male-dominated occupations seem like forces to be reckoned with or, at least, made products that reflected their appropriation of feminist ideals.
Cross-posted at Pacific Standard.
Nicole Bedera is a PhD student in sociology at the University of Maryland, College Park. She is currently studying college sexual assault and construction of young men’s sexualities.
Comments 6
raanne — November 4, 2015
A quick search on amazon and I see a computer engineer, Pediatrician, nurse, vet, cheerleader, soldier, doctor, chef and on and on and on. Its been years since I played with barbie, but I know we always played with it as a tool of imagination, pretending to "be" barbie, so this doesn't feel disingenuous to me.And these aren't just the expensive barbies either. Look up "Barbie Careers" (which appears to be a current line of barbies) and on the first page in amazon you see a baker, a teacher, a scientist, a zoo keeper, an eye doctor, pediatrician, astronaut, entrepreneur, director, pilot, etc... and these range from $9-$20 so they aren't the collectors versiones either.
Tee — November 4, 2015
Yeah, "knees up, like a unicorn" from the soccer coach seemed a bit twee; definitely their lines were scripted by people who went for maximum "adorbs" while the i-Que went with boyish enthusiasm. Interesting.
Jessica Gribble — November 5, 2015
I respectfully disagree, at least about part of this. I think the grownups were laughing because the kids were unexpected, but I think they listened respectfully and gave the kid professionals the benefit of the doubt. This same kind of confused laughter would greet an adult in costume or one who used mime or dance. And I agree with RaAnne below, who says that kids play with Barbie in many creative ways. Are girls pushed into gender-specific roles by our society? Yes. But how can things change if we're never willing to let some of the perpetrators change? Maybe this is all about making money for Mattel, but they at least understand that the people buying their products for their daughters care about opportunities for girls. Less blame, more working together.
Bill R — November 7, 2015
Mattel is simply doing what it has always aspired to: generating broad appeal for the product that translates into sales. Any social message is subordinate to marketing goals, driven solely by pragmatism. This is simple, straightforward. There are no additional agendas here.
Roms Gamer — September 23, 2021
Great article! And agan I came back to my childhood as at this site https://romsopedia.com/ which I found resently. Well I don`t know why but there is a strerotype that girls don`t like to play videogames. For example when i was younger I liked to play barbie, and i even had some videogames about it. What do you think about femenism in modern games?