Last year I was tickled to write about a cool study showing that, if a person grows up with a language that writes from left to right, then numerical estimates of things like weight or height will, on average, be smaller when a person is imperceptibly and unknowingly leaning to the left. Seriously, it’s awesomely fun research and you can read about it here.
Today I have the equally fun pleasure of sharing a research study on weight and importance. It turns out that, when people are holding something heavy, they will report an issue to be more serious, compared to when they are holding something lighter.
Some examples come from a set of studies by psychologist Nils Jostmann and colleagues.
- In the first study, European participants were asked to guess the value of various foreign currency in euros. Some were given a heavy clipboard on which to mark their estimates, and others a light clipboard. Those who held the light clipboard estimated, on average, lesser values.
- In a second study, subjects were asked to estimate the importance of college students having a voice in a decision-making process involving grants to study abroad. Participants with the heavy clipboard felt that it was more important for students to have a voice.
- In a third, subjects were asked to report whether they liked their city after reading a biography of the mayor and indicating how the felt about him. If they carried the heavy clipboard, there was a relationship between their estimation of the mayor and that of the city, but not if they carried a light clipboard. In this case, the importance of their feelings about the mayor weighed heavier on their evaluation of the city if the clipboard was heavy.
What is driving these findings?
In English, and several other languages as well, weight is used as metaphor to signify importance. The authors hypothesized that this abstraction can be triggered by concrete experiences of weight, like holding something heavy. They call this “embodied cognition.” Our thinking is affected by the connection between our bodies, their relationship with objects, and metaphors in our minds.
Another nail in the Descartian mind-body dualism coffin.
Cross-posted at Pacific Standard.
Lisa Wade, PhD is an Associate Professor at Tulane University. She is the author of American Hookup, a book about college sexual culture; a textbook about gender; and a forthcoming introductory text: Terrible Magnificent Sociology. You can follow her on Twitter and Instagram.
Comments 18
More Proof of the Power of Metaphorical Language | anthropology208 — February 6, 2014
[…] Another link I came across this morning talking about recent research that demonstrates the degree to which our metaphorical language influences the way we interpret situations – That’s “Heavy”: The Mind-Body Metaphor Connection. […]
Thomas Gokey — February 6, 2014
I can't find the study at the moment but I will keep looking. There was a study done that found that jurors who sit on wooden chairs find defendants guilty significantly more often than jurors who sit on cushioned chairs.
We like to think that something like judgement of guilt and innocence is something that happens free from such bodily influences, that we are making rational and considered mental judgements. But perhaps justice lies in the chair?
Reading that study made me think back to my childhood at a conservative evangelical church. The pews were wooden and very uncomfortable. The suggestion was made that our church invest in some cushions for all of the pews to make them more comfortable. This was a surprisingly controversial suggestion. Some people suggested that we shouldn't value comfort in a place like church, that being physically uncomfortable would help lead to virtue. Others were worried about the acoustics. Some argued we should consider the elderly and try to make things as comfortable as possible for them, yet it seemed to be the elderly who were most resistant to the idea. In the end, however, we did install cushions. Over time the church has gotten a little less conservative, and I wonder if the theology also lies in the pew?
MeltMae — February 6, 2014
How universal is "serious/heavy" I wonder. All three languages I speak do use the metaphorical heavy (Russian English and Swedish, all of them IE languages so they often make use of similar methaphors).The article mention Chinese a non IE ST language. Anyone other non-IE speakers here who can comment on this ?
Anna — February 6, 2014
The mention of "European" participants is confusing. What specific languages did they speak? Indo-European and Ural-Altaic languages both contain the heavy-important connection. What languages did some participants speak that belong outside of these two native-to-Europe linguistic families? What languages that do not contain the metaphor did Jostmann and his colleagues contrast with the ones that do in order to reach this hypothesis?
Larry Charles Wilson — February 6, 2014
lol
Bill R — February 7, 2014
I am a strong believer that our bodies--muscles, limbs and organs, etc.--are intimately connected to our psyches and souls. The brain (mind? really?) is just another piece part.
If you're feeling depressed someday, try forcing a smile for a few minutes. It can change your demeanor...
Michelle — February 7, 2014
I recommend this book: "I Is an Other: The Secret Life of Metaphor and How It Shapes the Way We See the World." It talks about this stuff. Was a fun, fascinating read. http://www.amazon.com/Is-Other-Secret-Metaphor-Shapes/dp/0061710296
[links] Link salad can’t sell you what you need | jlake.com — February 8, 2014
[…] That’s “Heavy”: The Mind-Body-Metaphor Connection — This is fascinating. In English, and several other languages as well, weight is used as metaphor to signify importance. The authors hypothesized that this abstraction can be triggered by concrete experiences of weight, like holding something heavy. They call this “embodied cognition.” […]
Quote of the day: Latter-day Hidden Persuaders | eats shoots 'n leaves — August 5, 2014
[…] this year I reviewed a study that found that, simply by changing the weight of an object in hand, psychologists can manipulate […]
“Smell was our first sense… We think because we smelled”* | (Roughly) Daily — August 15, 2014
[…] this year I reviewed a study that found that, simply by changing the weight of an object in hand, psychologists can manipulate […]