In 1999 Jackson Katz headlined a documentary that powerfully revealed the mask of masculinity, a pretense of stoicism and readiness for violence that many men feel compelled to put on, at least part of the time. The film, Tough Guise: Violence, Manhood, and American Culture, became a staple in classes on gender across the country.
Today marks the release of Tough Guise 2 and SocImages was given the honor of debuting an exclusive clip from the new film. In the segment below, Katz explains that men aren’t naturally violent but, instead, often learn how to be so. Focusing on socialization, however, threatens to make invisible the socialization agents. In other words, Katz argues, men don’t just learn to be more violent than they otherwise would be, they are actively taught.
He begins with the fact that the video game and film industries both take money from companies that make firearms to feature their products. The U.S. military then uses the video game Call of Duty for recruitment and training. It’s no use arguing whether the media, the military, or the gun industry are responsible for rates of violence, he observes, since they’re in cahoots. These extreme examples intersect with the everyday, mundane lessons about the importance of being “real men” that boys and men receive from the media and their peers, parents, coaches, and more.
This update of the original will tell the compelling story about manhood and violence to a new generation and remind older ones of the ongoing crisis of masculinity in America.
Cross-posted at Pacific Standard.
Lisa Wade, PhD is an Associate Professor at Tulane University. She is the author of American Hookup, a book about college sexual culture; a textbook about gender; and a forthcoming introductory text: Terrible Magnificent Sociology. You can follow her on Twitter and Instagram.
Comments 25
Letta Wren Page — October 15, 2013
Seeing this on the front page of TSP made me also think about the latest Contexts' cover article: Ritual violence in a 2-car garage http://contexts.org/articles/summer-2013/ritual-violence-in-a-two-car-garage/
TOUGH GUISE 2: THE ONGOING CRISIS OF VIOLENT MASCULINITY | Welcome to the Doctor's Office — October 15, 2013
[...] from SocImages [...]
SeaGreen — October 15, 2013
The third movie in this series should explore male hatred of women, which seems to be an emotional source of male violence.
Eisenkov — October 15, 2013
"The U.S. military then uses the video game Call of Duty for recruitment and training." -- I'm going to admit that I mostly follow this blog for such kind of comical unfounded assertions.
Tough Guise II « Worlding — October 16, 2013
[...] In 1999 Jackson Katz headlined a documentary that powerfully revealed the mask of masculinity, a pretense of stoicism and readiness for violence that many men feel compelled to put on, at least part of the time, reports Sociological Images today: "The film, Tough Guise: Violence, Manhood, and American Culture, became a staple in classes on gender across the country. "Today marks the release of Tough Guise 2 and SocImages was given the honor of debuting an exclusive clip from the new film. In the segment below, Katz explains that men aren’t naturally violent but, instead, often learn how to be so. Focusing on socialization, however, threatens to make invisible the socialization agents. In other words, Katz argues, men don’t just learn to be more violent than they otherwise would be, they are actively taught. "He begins with the fact that the video game and film industries both take money from companies that make firearms to feature their products. The U.S. military then uses the video game Call of Duty for recruitment and training. It’s no use arguing whether the media, the military, or the gun industry are responsible for rates of violence, he observes, since they’re in cahoots. These extreme examples intersect with the everyday, mundane lessons about the importance of being “real men” that boys and men receive from the media and their peers, parents, coaches, and more. "This update of the original will tell the compelling story about manhood and violence to a new generation and remind older ones of the ongoing crisis of masculinity in America." More at: http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2013/10/15/tough-guise-2-a-new-film-on-the-ongoing-crisis-of-vi... [...]
Yrro Simyarin — October 16, 2013
I feel like you've got some of your cause and effect mixed up... masculine violence is one of the oldest and most consistent parts of our (and pretty much everyone's) culture, going all the way back to hunting parties. Until you get a global armistice, *someone* in society has needed to be capable of violence, and historically men have been prepared for that role.
We didn't create a violent culture to sell guns and video games... we created video games because we are a violent culture. As is nearly every successful culture in history, because those who weren't were wiped out or enslaved.
We can have a reasonable discussion about whether that violence is still needed or not. And we can have a *great* discussion about the effects that preparation has on men - both those who do and do not want to embrace it... but a claim that it is *caused* by video games and gun companies seems very ignorant of history.
Maybe I'm just arguing with a bad summary here... but well, that's the post Lisa decided to put on her blog.
Gamer — November 20, 2013
The part of the article that states "The U.S. military then uses the video game Call of Duty for recruitment and training." That's incorrect, the US military doesn't use Call of Duty to recruit and train, they use their own game that they had developed called Americas Army... Please make correction because now that Call of Duty is progressing into futuristic games this comment becomes more and more inaccurate.
-Gamer
What Is Your Call of Duty? | Yoga Calm Blog — December 11, 2013
[…] violent games bring unique impacts and challenges, violence isn’t the only problem. Saga-type games can consume attention, as children get hooked […]
rwinkel — February 4, 2014
It's a looping structure, the culture creates the people that fill the positions in its self-organized self-perpetuating network of authority figures. Networks are hard to disrupt, but this one has a number of vulnerabilities, and the most vulnerable happens to be the most crucial: birth. The american medical establishment has turned birth from a celebration and welcoming into a violent rite of passage to a lifetime of learned helplessness, depression, psychopathy and violence. The research has been done, it's been known for decades and yet no one seems to care. Start with circumcision, the amputation of ecstatic connectedness with one's mate ( https://www.academia.edu/3288209/Male_Circumcision_in_the_USA_A_Human_Rights_Primer ). But that's just the tip of the iceberg. Look up "hispanic paradox" on wikipedia and see where it leads.
Response Prompt #8 | ENGL132Spring2014 — April 3, 2014
[…] Violent Masculinity […]
Response Prompt #6 | ENGL250GenderStudies — April 3, 2014
[…] Violent Masculinity […]
Response Prompt #8 | English 132 Summer 2014 — June 26, 2014
[…] Violent Masculinity […]
Response Prompt #7 | ENGL132FALL2014 — October 10, 2014
[…] Violent Masculinity […]
Ramblings on gender in the church and culture | Cissy Brady-Rogers — November 19, 2014
[…] leadership roles in government, media and business. On top of all of that, media stereotypes about masculinity (“real men” are tough, stoic and violent) and femininity (“real women” are […]
mayfieldga — December 14, 2014
Yes, I have lived in both a housing project and also in West Palm Beach with the sons and daughters of doctors, lawyers, and engineers. The kids were virtually the same. The big differences were the anxieties, lack of knowledge, and for boys, much more aggressive treatment designed to make them tough. This left many boys unable to learn nearly as well. In West palm Beach, the boys were much more stable, knowledgeable from their parents and peers. Still in West Palm Beach, there was still some drive to make their sons tougher also.
As a result, the boys in West Palm Beach did much better than the boys in the housing project with more stability, knowledge, and skills provided. However, those boys did worse than their Female peers.
In the housing project, the girls did much better than the boys, for the drive to make those boys tough coupled with much less mental, emotional, social, verbal interaction, created tremendous lags in mental, emotional, social, verbal growth.
The need to be tough I feel is driven socially by the aggression given boys as early as on year of age and increased over time, especially in lower socioeconomic areas. This is maintained by parents, peers, teachers, and the media that model only those traits and respect accordingly. The aggression they receive from a very young age onward fosters more social/emotional distance, distrust, fear, and preparation for defense. This fosters more aggression in boys. There is another growing "feeling or need to be tough for boys". Boys are given love and honor only when they have some achievement, status, power, etc. This was designed to make boys tough. Those boys not achieving are given more ridicule and discipline to make them try harder. Support is not an option for fear of coddling.
The big problem here for society in the information age is that the more aggressive treatment is creating more social/emotional distance, higher average stress that hurts learning; more activity for stress relief; lower social vocabulary; higher muscle tension that hurts handwriting/motivation to write, and much lag in communication and trust of teachers/adults.
This is setting up many boys to fail in school. since boys are given love and honor only when they are achieving in some way, this leaves many boys with low self-esteem in school and so sends many boys to video games, sports, and risk taking to garner tid bits of love and honor from their peers. The more cold, distant, aggressive treatment designed to make them tough is now perhaps some of the only tools or skills they left to develop, so they develop those things to compete for love and honor from their peers. I feel we are creating unknowingly a growing army of very angry Males who are somehow for the most part willing to live within the legal boundaries of society. I fear in time, there will be so many Males unable to compete in the information age, there will be a growing array of acts of violence, even without regard for their own lives just to somehow, reclaim feelings of self-worth they may feel they have lost from society.
Response Prompt #7 | English 132 SPRING 2015 — April 21, 2015
[…] Violent Masculinity […]
morphtv — February 21, 2019
Tough Guise 2 is a film which made me think about the story it portrayed to the deepest of my thoughts. Several days and months later, i forgot about that movie yet again watched it on morph tv app on my Brand New Samsung Galaxy S10e.
pokevision alternative — March 30, 2019
It was a wonderful movie. I really loved it. You have beautifully written this article about it. Keep up the great work.
Soleha — January 29, 2020
Tough Guise 2 stands to empower a new generation of young men--and women--to challenge the myth that being a real man means putting up a false front and engaging in violent and self-destructive behavior.
https://www.unlockmytv.co/
http://vivatv.live/