UBC Sociology student Pat Louie tweeted us a touching set of photographs by artist Gabriele Galimberti. Each image is a child with his or her favorite toys. They are in Malawi, Italy, Ukraine, Thailand, Zanzibar, Albania, Botswana, and elsewhere and the diversity is stunning.
The photographs reveal a universality — pride in favorite toys and the love of play — but, writes Ben Machell at Galimberti’s website, “how they play can reveal a lot.” The children’s life experiences influenced their imaginative play:
…the girl from an affluent Mumbai family loves Monopoly, because she likes the idea of building houses and hotels, while the boy from rural Mexico loves trucks, because he sees them rumbling through his village to the nearby sugar plantation every day.
Galimberti, interviewed by Machell, also observed class differences in entitlement to ownership:
The richest children were more possessive. At the beginning, they wouldn’t want me to touch their toys, and I would need more time before they would let me play with them. In poor countries, it was much easier. Even if they only had two or three toys, they didn’t really care. In Africa, the kids would mostly play with their friends outside.
These photographs are reminiscent of another wonderful photography project featuring kids and their toys. JeonMee Yoon photographed boys with all their blue stuff and girls with all their pink stuff. The results are striking. Likewise, there’s a wonderful set of photographs by James Mollison, counterposing portraits with children’s sleeping arrangements across cultures. These are all wonderful projects that powerfully illustrate global and class difference and inequality.
Lisa Wade, PhD is an Associate Professor at Tulane University. She is the author of American Hookup, a book about college sexual culture; a textbook about gender; and a forthcoming introductory text: Terrible Magnificent Sociology. You can follow her on Twitter and Instagram.
Comments 24
Anna — April 10, 2013
Galimberti's quote is confusing. How does she rank richer and poorer countries - I view most of these countries as very poor. And even if they were all equally poor (or rich), every country depicted here contains massive social inequality, ie runs the gamut of obscenely wealthy to extremely poor families. How and why were these children selected?
Elli — April 10, 2013
Interesting observations but they seem not to correlate with the depictions, at least not of the pictures chosen.
(1) Her claim that children pick toys they can relate to because of their living conditions. But then again, we see Barbie dolls (or similar) in most girls' pictures; and in the case of boys, both a boy from poor Mali and a "rich" boy from Texas are playing with dinosaurs (as well as my son and many other children who all find the mysterious beasts exciting).
(2) Her claim about the "possessive-ness" of richer kids sounds interesting. However, would a child from a poor Western family behave differently? Perhaps it is a matter of culture? Kids e.g. who are more used to live with an extended family and neighbours, with which toys must be shared?
If anything, the most striking difference I saw (and also seems to correlate with my own experience) is that while almost no politically correct Western parent would let his son play with so many guns; this is considered OK in post-Soviet cultures and probably other cultures less exposed to Western parenthood discourse (e.g. Arab culture).
Nevertheless, what I really found interesting, from the pictures you have chosen to show, is how universal the choice of toys is, even in poorer countries; and how universal toy choice is so gendered,
Arrielle — April 10, 2013
children play with whatever you give them to. And if they don't get anything they all will end up building all sorts of "guns", "dolls" and "balls from sticks and fabric..I don't see any value in this article.
kona bro — April 10, 2013
any conclusions we could draw from this would be purely anecdotal. but the person responsible for this is a photographer, not a sociologist, scientist, or a researcher. what we can definitely conclude from this, though, is that children everywhere in the world are proud of their toys, and are, scientifically speaking, absolutely adorable.
Wondering — April 11, 2013
I was struck by how many little girls had balls as their favourite toys. Not a single boy had a ball amongst his favourites in these photos. And I guess I noticed because I have a nephew who loooooves balls.
oBifferson — April 11, 2013
It's interesting that the children that seem to be from wealthier countries are more likely to have solely gender-appropriate (at least from this small set of photos and based on what is commonly assumed to be appropriate for gender in these countries), while those from poorer countries (specifically Africa, it looks like) are more likely to have toys we see as appropriate for both genders (the boy with the Valentine's Day bunny and the girls with Skeletor and other action figures).
Ami Rao — April 11, 2013
How were these images chosen, entirely randomly? There seems to be a subtle bias.
The less affluent children are shown with more gender neutral toys and the more affluent with highly gendered toys (especially those two girls in all-pink rooms who are the ONLY ones like that in the entire slideshow). There is a good mix on the artist's website.
The only child shown with educational material is the girl from China, while children of various genders/races/wealth levels with books and learning tools are seen when you go through the slideshow.
All 'poorer' children from Africa are shown (mosquito nets check). To help people appreciate diversity in the continent, why not also include the affluent girl from Algeria? Or the girl from Egypt? The boy from Morocco? The boy from South Africa?
Perhaps to go along with the blurb, pictures of less affluent children smiling and more affluent/white children looking glum have been chosen. This is also not the case in the artist's slideshow, there the individual childrens' personalities shine through.
And my biggest criticism - how you could you not choose the photo of the girl with all those pairs of sunglasses!! It is super cute :)
Jane — April 12, 2013
Interesting how "America" becomes a default. We are informed of what country each of the children is from, except for the Americans. I've looked on the artist's webpage, and it is done there as well,l which is particularly interesting as the artist appears to be an Italian living in Italy.
KrishnaPineapple — April 12, 2013
Just looking at the photos shown here, the Chinese girl has, in my opinion, the best toys. Art supplies! Music toys! Blocks! Fake food! Big, soft plushies! If she wants a playmate, I am down.
Variation and Universality in Children’s Play | Life's A Weekend! — May 20, 2013
[...] Variation and Universality in Children’s Play. [...]
Variation and Universality in Children’s Play | Life's A Weekend! — May 20, 2013
[...] Variation and Universality in Children’s Play. [...]
Less Toys = Better Sharing? | Home, naturally — May 29, 2013
[...] Wade studied children and their toys around the world. She found out that richer kids (who therefore often had a [...]
Purple is a girl's color - This flooded sky — May 24, 2014
[…] is so cool – some other cool (non-creepy) kiddie photo collections:Kids and their, um, stuffCultural variation and universality in children’s playWhere children […]