This is the second part in a series about how girls and women can navigate a culture that treats them like sex objects (see also, part One). Cross-posted at Ms. and Caroline Heldman’s Blog.
The “sex wars” of the 1980s pitted radical feminists, who claimed that female sexual objectification is dehumanizing, against feminists concerned about legal and social efforts to control and repress female sexuality. Over a decade of research now shows that radical feminists were right to be highly concerned.
Getting back to the “sex wars” and how radical feminists were right, women who grow up in a culture with widespread sexual objectification tend to view themselves as objects of desire for others. This internalized sexual objectification has been linked to problems with mental health (e.g., clinical depression, “habitual body monitoring”), eating disorders, body shame, self-worth and life satisfaction, cognitive functioning, motor functioning, sexual dysfunction, access to leadership, and political efficacy. Women of all ethnicities internalize objectification, as do men to a lesser extent.
Beyond the internal effects, sexually objectified women are dehumanized by others and seen as less competent and worthy of empathy by both men and women. Furthermore, exposure to images of sexually objectified women causes male viewers to be more tolerant of sexual harassment and rape myths. Add to this the countless hours that most girls/women spend primping and competing with one another to garner heterosexual male attention, and the erasure of middle-aged and elderly women who have little value in a society that places women’s primary value on their sexualized bodies.
Theorists have also contributed to understanding the harm of objectification culture by pointing out the difference between sexy and sexual. If one thinks of the subject/object dichotomy that dominates thinking in Western culture, subjects act and objects are acted upon. Subjects are sexual, while objects are sexy.
Pop culture sells women and girls a hurtful lie: that their value lies in how sexy they appear to others, and they learn at a very young age that their sexuality is for others. At the same time, being sexual, is stigmatized in women but encouraged in men. We learn that men want and women want-to-be-wanted. The yard stick for women’s value (sexiness) automatically puts them in a subordinate societal position, regardless of how well they measure up. Perfectly sexy women are perfectly subordinate.
The documentary Miss Representation has received considerable mainstream attention, one indicator that many are now recognizing the damaging effects of female sexual objectification.
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gkIiV6konY]
To sum up, widespread sexual objectification in U.S. popular culture creates a toxic environment for girls and women. The following posts in this series provide ideas for navigating new objectification culture in personally and politically meaningful ways.
Comments 47
Anna Cook — July 6, 2012
The “sex wars” of the 1980s pitted radical feminists, who claimed that female sexual objectification is dehumanizing, against feminists concerned about legal and social efforts to control and repress female sexuality. Over a decade of research now shows that radical feminists were right to be highly concerned.
While I didn't personally live through the "sex wars" of the 80s, I am an historian of gender and sexuality and have read a number of memoirs and primary source materials about the pornography debates of that era. I would argue that while the pro-sex feminists were, indeed, concerned about free expression, calls for censorship, and sexual expression by consenting adults, it's a false dichotomy to claim that many of them weren't ALSO concerned with the way mainstream culture represented female sexuality. It's not so much that the radical feminists were "highly concerned" about sexual objectification while others were unconcerned about it. It's just that the others saw the solution in creating less dehumanizing sexual imagery and more feminist sexual scripts and sharing them, rather than working to erase and repress the representations of sexuality we don't like.
I'm sure you could find people who would argue that there's nothing harmful about any type of sexual representation, and that those who critically analyze sexual culture are just "overthinking" it. But in my experience, pro-sex feminists take sexual culture very seriously indeed, and see sexual expression -- yes, even visual sexual culture -- as one pathway out of dehumanizing sexual objectification.
Alex Odell — July 6, 2012
The difficult thing for our culture seems to be what qualifies as healthy, non-shameful sexuality, and what is objectification. For women, being sexy basically equates you with being a sexual object for others to enjoy. Anything else and you're a slut (and even then, you're still probably a slut). I was watching Haywire, and the protagonist, Gina Carano, was kicking ass and being confident (believably, no fighting fuck toys in that movie) which totally enhanced her attractiveness. And I was thinking 'Wow, if they ever did a Wonder Woman movie, she should definitely get the part', until I realized they would never cast someone like her. They're always gonna go for the skinny sex doll, even when she's supposed to be a strong superheroine, because women in movies have to be sexy, and there's only one kind of sexy.
Snuhfoo — July 7, 2012
Thank you for the sexy vs sexual distinction. The idea that women should always look sexy, yet id they have sex they are sluts, has always seemed confusing and in conflict with itself. But when you differentiate sexy vs sexual it's actually scarily consistent.
James H — August 22, 2012
Men are harmed by media images and unrealistic body standards. Few men look like underwear models. It seems like everywhere you look now are ribbed shirtless dudes. How does that effect young men and boys self-esteem? But for some reason, objectification for a female audience is cool.
Steve Corner — March 26, 2014
None of this is "scientific." What a load of crap. It's all "theorists" (unscientific ones, at that), that are making these claims.
George — July 18, 2016
Seems like a two way sword to me. I'm a guy by the way. I like to think I'm a feminist but I might be short-sighted.
Hmm.. Sexual liberation is just way too important to censor potentially damaging images. I still don't think women should be shamed by how they dress or what movies, advertisements, or films, videos, or pictures they choose to be in.Censorship shaming is akin to female repression. I don't think its an accident that the most repressive cultures (some traditional arabic cultures, victorian culture, etc) were/are very short on womens rights. Any kind of repression is wrong imo and a restriction of freedom and/or acceptance (of sexuality, orientation, choices of consenting adults) is bad even if could be/was gender neutral.
From my perspective the real problem is the perception (by men and women) of womens bodies "standards" and women's "acceptable" behavior (a person to be acted upon) rather than the actual media. Its a problem when (in the workplace or social interaction) women are seen as or made to feel like an object (someone to be acted on) or that they don't have intellectual or emotional value (another sense of the word "object").
Sure media effects people (it exists in a feedback loop kind of). I acknowledge it can cause the problems you listed.I think its possible to navigate a media saturated world though.
I would think that the adults could be a little more mature, less impressionable, and think about the context of what they see. I would think that that parents could...idk... maybe not let there impressionable children watch tv, read fashion magazines, or view potentially hazardous material. Parents could teach girls that having a boyfriend or man isn't something to put a ton of value into (or any value into).
Kids really need to have it drilled into them to be independent and to not worry about lookism. Worked pretty well with me (I think), but I didn't face the same issues as women and girls. I'm a white male and I am privileged...I get that.
Maybe extremely careful parenting and mindfulness aren't a solution. I don't know how to fix the effects of objectification media and they certainly are serious but I think that censorship and shaming isn't the answer. This is weird because its not like all women/men have the problems you listed or are effected significantly by such media. Clearly, there's a sociological impact but that doesn't translate to necessary or probable individual impact; so I guess there's hope there. Maybe just talking about it will prove to enough. Maybe I'll come back and delete my comment. It's horribly written.
www.fdsfsdf.com — February 5, 2020
Thank you for some other informative site. Where
else may I get that kind of info written in such a perfect
approach? I have a project that I'm simply now running on, and I've been on the look
out for such info.
Inderrajjeet Singh — February 4, 2025
Radical feminists of the 1980s controlled women for male pleasure and dehumanized them. The third wave of feminism was a form of empowerment, choice, and sexual agency. Moreover, problems related to mental health were Anxiety, Depression, and Body dysmorphia. Further, male viewers were more tolerant of sexual harassment and rape myths due to the images. due to which women had less value in society.
subjects act and objects are acted upon.
Subjects are sexual, while objects are sexy.
Pop culture sold women and girls the hurtful lie that their value is based on their appearance and how sexy they are rather than their character.