Sociologists have observed that employment in the U.S. is largely structured around an assumption that the worker has no family responsibilities. The ideas that an employee should be able to work during non-school hours, stay late when needed, take off time for their own illness but never anyone else’s, for example, all presume that the workers have either no children or someone else taking care of children for them.
Most jobs, then, are not designed to be compatible with family responsibilities. Since most people doing primary child care are women, this hurts mothers disproportionately. Mothers have a more difficult time being the “perfect employee” and also face discrimination from employers. This translates into some telling numbers. Women make about 69% of what men make (not controlling for type of occupation), but most of this disadvantage is related to parental status, not sex. Women without children make 90% of what men make, while mothers make 66%. Ann Crittenden’s book, The Price of Motherhood, lays out these numbers starkly.
These issues are at the heart of this well-crafted Ampersand cartoon by B. Deutsch, which prompted this post in anticipation of Mother’s Day in the U.S.
Lisa Wade, PhD is an Associate Professor at Tulane University. She is the author of American Hookup, a book about college sexual culture; a textbook about gender; and a forthcoming introductory text: Terrible Magnificent Sociology. You can follow her on Twitter and Instagram.
Comments 23
Barry Deutsch — May 12, 2012
Oh, cool! Thanks for using my cartoon. :-)
Alex — May 12, 2012
The cartoon really says it all — nice work Barry! Great post too; I'm curious now about the structure of other countries' work days.
Anna — May 12, 2012
It's clear that there is discrimination going on here, but what are some of the alternatives that such studies propose? I am most curious about coinciding work hours with school hours, as it seems so difficult to do.
As it is, if the parent works away from home, it means that the parent would have to work less hours than is considered a full workday. Could they take their work 'home'? Could they even work at home while tending to their children? Can they take on the same responsibilities and projects (and be paid the same amount of money) with less hours of work? Or is it school hours that must be broken down into an entirely different system? But would it mean children would have to be at school or under school supervision for longer hours?
It is also very difficult for many children to have to be awake and alert early in the morning. 9:00 is fairly standard for the U.S, but in many countries school starts an hour or even earlier than that (and ends earlier than 15:00-15:30, another issue). The morning part was always torture for me, particularly in the winter when it was still dark outside, and I presume the hours were set up so that I would go to school the same time my parents went to (or had to be at) work.
Bextraordinary — May 12, 2012
I'm reading about the difficulties of balancing family and work right now in Arlie Hochschild's "Time Bind." Great book so far, but many depressing revelations. I'm looking forward to reading more about how she feels the difficulties she uncovered might best be addressed.
Rachel Melendes — May 12, 2012
My mom has been fired twice for being pregnant. The first time in 1986, when she was pregnant with me, and then again in 2005 when she was pregnant with my little sister. Not only was she probably making less, but getting fired while pregnant meant the company didn't have to pay her maternity leave. Then she had to go start all over and work her way back up to the same amount of vacation, benefits, pay, etc. with another company.
Bill D. — May 13, 2012
Can someone explain what "not controlling for type of occupation" means? It sounds like their comparing a 1st grade teacher salary with a CEO.
eeka — May 13, 2012
And parents aren't the only ones...most workplaces also have either de jure or de facto policies that are easier to violate if you're brown or queer.
How often do we see someone disciplined for using "unprofessional" language because s/he used totally work-appropriate urban/POC slang, while white suburban slang is used freely in the same workplace? Or for wearing something that's not any more casual or revealing than anyone else's outfit, but just looks more urban/nonwhite (i.e. "unprofessional") to a white suburban supervisor?
Or queer people are fired for discussing "sexual" or "overly personal" issues while straight people are perfectly free to display photos of their families, mention who they're married to, and discuss what events they attend on the weekends?
TA — May 17, 2012
I think that framing policies which allow people to be people (in addition to being workers) as favoring parents vs. non-parents is actually not a good way to look at it. Workers vs. workers or workers vs. employers?
Even parents do not usually parent small children for that many years (compared to their entire adult working lives). But consider their other family obligations (such as taking care of sick/disabled parents or spouses), and now we are talking about many more people, for many more years of their working lives.
You have a good point, that employers would have a hard time filling the
gaps left by community and family while still remaining competitive. They should not have a competitiveness problem for doing the right thing, and for recognizing that they are part of the community, part of the problem and the solution. The good employers ought to favor some lowest-common-denominator policies.
The U.S. doesn't require sick leave, for example, let alone paid sick leave. But I tend to think that if the difference between a company being in business or failing comes down to offering unpaid sick leave? They should fail.
Julie — May 29, 2012
Businesses pay people to work, not to have personal lives. It's nonsense for anyone to expect otherwise.
Alexandra — October 16, 2013
here is unswer http://ladiesfiction.ru
Kyle C. Lineberger — June 23, 2022
Be very careful that you do not burn yourself! If you https://dltutuapp.com/tutuapp-download/ decide to leave the water in the pot, then make sure to remove it from the heat source before using it.
Arthur L. Hawkins — June 23, 2022
Don't pour the water into a plastic bowl. You https://showbox.run/ don't want small plastic molecules getting involved in your facial steam.