Cross-posted at Global Policy TV.
Recent research has unearthed the interesting finding that most Americans dislike atheists. In fact, they strongly dislike atheists. Surveys suggest that they’d rather share a beer with almost anyone, even members of historically-hated groups: homosexuals, African-Americans, or Muslims (yes, even after 9/11). This phenomenon is new in American society, as I’ll discuss below, and reflects a significant change in our social alliances.
But first, consider this data published by Penny Edgell and her colleagues in the American Sociological Review (full text). It reveals that Americans believe that atheists, more than many other groups, are not likely to agree with their “vision of American society.” Atheists topped the list, beating out the second contender, Muslims, by 13 percentage points. Likewise, among the types of people Americans would not want their children to marry, atheists come first, beating out Muslims (again) by 14 points and African Americans by a full 20.
This dislike for atheists, by the way, isn’t on the wane. While dislike of gays and lesbians has been easing, racism has become increasingly unacceptable, and religious diversity has become less contentious, intolerance for non-believers has held steady.
An even more recent article revealed that the reason people dislike atheists so much has to do with trust (cite). Many people are skeptical that someone who doesn’t believe in God would do the right thing, given that they don’t imagine that a higher power is watching them and keeping score. Atheists were more distrusted than Muslims, Jews, gay men, and feminists. The only group that was as strongly suspected of bad behavior as atheists? Rapists.
What is interesting in all this – above and beyond a clear prejudice against atheists – is the change in how Americans think about religion. Until recently, members of different religious saw each other as enemies, not friends. American history is characterized by “long-standing divisions among Protestants, Catholics, and Jews” (Edgell et al.). Many of us can remember how significant it was to elect the first Catholic president (something we take for granted as unremarkable now) and we are on the precipice of nominating a Mormon to run on the Republican ticket.
Indeed, historical data shows that Americans have been increasingly willing to vote for a Catholic or Jewish Presidential Candidate (as well as an African American and homosexual candidate), but their willingness to vote for an atheist is lagging behind:
The take home point has to do with shifting social alliances. Now that most Americans have abandoned a strong dislike for members of other religions, it’s possible for The Religious to emerge as a socially-meaningful identity group. In other words, once members of different religions begin to see each other as the same instead of different, they can begin to align together. Suddenly atheists become an obvious foe. Instead of one of many types of people who had lost their way (along with people of different faiths), atheists could emerge as uniquely problematic. It is the building of cross-religious alliances, then, that undergirds the strong dislike for atheists specifically.
Lisa Wade, PhD is an Associate Professor at Tulane University. She is the author of American Hookup, a book about college sexual culture; a textbook about gender; and a forthcoming introductory text: Terrible Magnificent Sociology. You can follow her on Twitter and Instagram.
Comments 122
Ernest Valdemar — March 27, 2012
"Many of us can remember how significant it was to elect the first Catholic president"
That's true, but that was way back in 1960. People for whom that is a livign memory are now over 60. What I find odd is how few people remember how significant it was to elect our first "born-again," evangelical president. How many people even remember that Jimmy Carter was and still is an evangelical Christian, who was widely ridiculed by conservatives for his religious views? (e.g., "I have lusted after women in my heart." Cue derisive laughter.)
Jam Blair — March 27, 2012
If I was going on religion alone, I would be much more likely to vote for an atheist than a Mormon, I have to say.
Ricky Sharp — March 27, 2012
People may just hate atheists because some of us are pretty abrasive. LOL
Tom Acker — March 27, 2012
This data is from 2003 and 1999, not exactly "recent findings"
Anna — March 27, 2012
Atheism is one of the few things that consistently shocks me for being a legitimate taboo. Many public figures - especially politicians - hide being atheist, which must not only be incredibly frustrating for them, but is also s disservice to atheists.
A lot of it must be a holdover from the Cold War propaganda and that conflated idea of communist=atheist=evil. What other explanations are there for this taboo?
Anonymous — March 27, 2012
I'm an atheist and I keep reading reports like this - there was an article in Slate a couple months ago - but I have never experienced any sort of prejudice personally. I live in Northern California, though, not the "bible belt".
I wonder how much of the prejudice is abstract rather than concrete. I'm sure there are people who have known me for years without learning my religious beliefs. It's not like I'm wearing an Atheist hat or something. I find it hard to believe that someone who knew me for five year, upon finding out that I was an atheist would suddenly cut off all contact with me.
What I do get is the feeling that religious groups in the US are feeling more and more like they are being disenfranchised as religious traditions are being removed from secular life. I think there is an interpretation that atheists are "ganging up on them" or trying to oppress them, rather than promoting a more consistent first amendment application.
Gold Cat — March 27, 2012
Weird. I am less likely to trust someone if I know they are religious, who only does the right thing because they think something is watching them keeping score...
Meghan O'Connor — March 27, 2012
What would also be interesting if they would do more studies? If they included other non-mainstream religion options. Not everyone is either patriarchal monotheistic or completely atheistic. Where are the studies for Hindu? Pagan religions? Agnostic? It's not an either/or, no matter how much they want to make it so.
Yrro Simyarin — March 27, 2012
One thing I always found interesting, growing up in a religious town, was how completely outside the worldview of the strongly religious any idea of atheist morality was.
It isn't that God is "keeping score." It's that without a divine purpose and order for the world and your life, what is your personal motivation to live as a "good" person instead of a self-serving hedonist? What is your personal motivation to continue living at all? How do you even have a definition of "good" without it being a cosmic law?
I mean, it's not an easy question, as evidenced by the thousands of years of philosophical writings on the subject.
If you haven't been raised in it or exposed to it, the jump to humanism as a natural philosophy in and of itself isn't necessarily obvious or understandable.
And it's not like the most visible atheists are really helping our cause here - the crusades and jihads are very much seen as something that *other* people do or did in their misguided and incorrect views of religion. Using them as your proof that religion is bad instead of spending time educating about possible, functional alternative social structures just makes people think you're a selfish, antagonizing jerk. ie, exactly the person they expect everyone to turn into without a religious reason not to.
Blix — March 27, 2012
As a Christian, I can't believe this. For one, atheism is taught in our public schools and traces are found even in believing communities. Secondly, I do not think anyone is so sure of their own intellect that they could truthfully claim atheism (more likely agnosticism). Thirdly, a huge portion of the world is agnostic, even if they claim a certain religious identity. People just don't know what they believe anymore. Lastly, true believers in Christ should be seeing every person in the same light. Every person's soul should carry the same weight. Come on.
Jazzswinger — March 27, 2012
Athiests are skeptics, we question things, seek out logical scientifically sound arguments. Religious people believe in blind faith. I think it is the athiests inquisitive mind that frightens them. smart people are feared
Guest — March 27, 2012
"Surveys suggest that (most Americans would) rather share a beer with [...] Muslims". I burst out laughing here, my apologies.
Anonymous — March 27, 2012
In the United States you have Freedom OF Religion... as opposed to Freedom FROM Religion.
Brawny — March 27, 2012
I''m surprised but I see this as a lack of communication or a lack of interest to communicate to the public what atheism stands for.
Alex Odell — March 27, 2012
For the people who'd rather have an atheist president than Romney - I'm pretty sure Romney's switch to the far right is for popularity. I actually think he's relatively smart when it comes to politics, but that's not enough for the poor, oppressed Christians these days. They need a bible-thumping preacher who dabbles in politics now, so Romney is ramping up his religiousness as a strategic move. These days, moral fiber doesn't mean crap, what we need in politicians is the willingness to use their brains and logic.
Guest — March 28, 2012
I think it's also important to note that ~30% of the target demographic said they would disapprove of their child wanting to marry an African American.
proscriptus — March 28, 2012
It's all right--I wouldn't want my children marrying marrying a Christian, either.
Lily — March 28, 2012
Well, I'm an atheist marrying another atheist, so they don't have to worry about it.
Sparkling — March 28, 2012
Yep, the religionists have done a great job with their lies and propaganda. They pre-smear nonbelievers while insisting that they are the only ones who can be "moral." We know that is a lie, but the ignorant are persuaded. Jail occupants are mostly Christian, for example, and so are the sleazy politicians, especially the ones who want to take away our freedoms.
Tell me why we should admire these people again and allow them to lead us? That way lies bondage, death, irrationality, and the worst depths of fascism. People have got to wake up and cancel whats going on in America right now, or we'll invite the worst nightmare we've ever seen, right in our lifetimes.
The type of disinformation the religionists have put out is how attention gets directed away from the truth, which allows things like abusive Catholic priests to fly under the radar for hundreds of years. Religion is NOT the basis for morality or ethics. We need to decouple the notions firmly and completely.
Anonymous — March 28, 2012
One thing I'll never understand is why people but so much weight in who is devoting their time to spiritual stuff.
Američané neradi ateisty | Občanské sdružení ateistů České republiky — March 28, 2012
[...] ve Spojených státech jsou pravděpodobně šťastnější než tamní ateisté. Lisa Wade na webu thesocietypages.org včera upozornila na skutečnost, že Američané ateisty nemají zrovna příliš v lásce. [...]
Gorf — March 29, 2012
Some of these comments exemplify much of what is disliked about the demeanor of many outspoken atheists. The apparent assertion of intellectual superiority solely because of an atheistic approach (and subsequent dismissal of the intellectual approach of an entire large body of people) is obnoxious and far from justified. I compare it to the sickening behavior of some religious folks that put themselves on a moral pedestal just because of their ties to religion (also extremely unjustified, and usually incredibly ironic/hypocritical), but more common among (outspoken) atheists, in my experience, and at least as pretentious.
Religious affiliation should (must) be driven by experience, not logic. The minute a person chooses a religion because they like its teachings, a door is open for synthesizing a God/gods (to go with a likable religion), and nullifies its potential for validity. For religion to bear any weight, we can't be creating God according to what we like/think. I agree with this qualm of many atheists in regards to the approach of many religious folks. But, due to what I mentioned in the first sentence of this paragraph, the blind faith vs. logic argument that is so frequently used bears little weight to me.
There's plenty of things taken on faith (in the sense that we don't have explicit explanation for) in everyday life that I don't see many atheists taking a strong stand against, which interests me. Heck, we still haven't seen the Higgs Boson with certainty ("God Particle" in obnoxious media language; this particle is theorized by the standard model, in place to explain mass contribution to the universe), but that doesn't mean I don't believe the universe has mass, nor will I claim that it doesn't exist. I've experienced what seems to be mass in this universe, it's as real as it can be in my mind, and I believe the Higgs Boson exists in some form. I've experienced what seems to be God in my life, it's as real as it can be in my mind, and I believe God exists in some form. Call it blind faith, if you'd like. But, I think it'd be necessary to say people that believe in mass or the standard model to be acting on blind faith, as well, if we're taking the perspective of "only believing what I have evidence for" that so many atheists claim.
I'm not saying you have to believe or that you should have experienced what seems to be God, nor do I have a reason why others may not have experienced it in a way as convincing to them as it seems to be for me. My belief (faith) comes from my experience, and that isn't readily extensible to the lives of other people to me in a way I can explain. And, I'm sure as heck not able to condemn anyone for thinking differently.
Village Idiot — March 29, 2012
Maybe if atheists got together and elected one representative atheist to wear an enormous hat or fancy outfit and published a book that included an arbitrary set of rules to live by as well as calling for an un-holy genocidal war against the non-un-believers then they would finally be accepted in society and considered suitable for marriage and elected office and such.
Kylie Gillis — March 29, 2012
It says "conservative Christians", but they should have added "Conservative Muslims". There ARE moderate Muslims, just as there are moderate Christians and Jews. Really, I'd just be least likely to enjoy the company of fundamentalist zealots of any religious stripe. Right up there with Neo Nazis and corporate lobbyists.
Theodore — March 29, 2012
There are two big reasons why this has been occurring, IMHO:
1) The increasing perception that there is a "war on religion" in America, perpetrated by Fox News and promoted ceaselessly by faith pandering lunatics like Santorum, Palin and Gingrich. These people have promoted the idea that there is an "atheist agenda" ready to destroy the structure of the US and turn it upside down.
2) The ceaselessly unnecessary, aggressive and pompous manner in which "New Atheists" have carried themselves in recent years.
guest — March 29, 2012
Gawd, these kind of polls are so misleading. "Atheism" isn't about what you do believe in, it's what you DON'T believe in. If they had asked if some one agreed with the vision of a Secular Humanist I'm sure people would have reacted completely differently.
Duffy166 — March 29, 2012
religions have to have a group to hate, us vs. them, to rally the faithful. just as any con artist or magican, needs a shill or distraction to sell his con or magic trick. we atheist present the biggest threat of exposing the religious con!!!After all most Americans don't like to let facts get in the way of their beliefs. I think that the statement that they don't trust atheist is a cover for the fact that we present a rational challange to their cherished beliefs which they know they cannot rationally defend.
Kenny Elliott — March 29, 2012
Interesting article. I think since most of the population of the United States believes in a God of some sort is why they have a dislike for Atheism. If it were reversed the numbers would be even higher against the religious. As some have commented before that many Atheists think that Christians haven't thought things through, or have no understanding of the universe. As a person of faith I know I feel very talked down too by atheists, not all, but most. However, I have had some very good and civil debates and talks with atheists. It doesn't help that Richard Dawkins, Bill Maher, and Christopher Hitchens have pretty much been the showcase for Atheism for most Americans. Bill Maher is very angry and cruel, and doesn't make atheism look very appealing. It also isn't helpful that many Atheists call religion/the religious a virus or a scourge on humanity. It just comes off as arrogant and scary to be honest. It sounds just like hate speech actually, and if it were against any other group would be. I would never say that about any group or person.
I truly worry if Atheism were to take over the American mindset would they put me in rehabilitation camps or throw me in jail or worse for my thoughts and beliefs? Because many seem so angry at religion and religious people blaming ALL mans hardships on it. Sure people have done some pretty horrible things in the name of religion, but in the 20th century we got to see Atheism do just as bad or worse with communism, fascism and nazism. So nobody is "safe" from history. Evil men seeking power, glory and riches will use anything to get it.
The American Christian isn't perfect by FAR, no human is, but that system of beliefs and understanding of the cosmos is what gave us the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and our human rights. Sure most references for God were removed, and scripture verses and structure was altered or removed, but we wouldn't have them if it wasn't for Christian philosophies. Especially true Christlike Christian philosophies (Not necessarily super right wing judgmental Christianity...this is NOT a Theocracy...pleh.). If that mindset were removed what's to stop an atheistic society from harming whoever isn't strong enough to protect themselves? Lob off the weak.
Also, I disagree with the "Blind Faith" model some of said of religion in the comments. If it were blind faith there would be no historical references to a deity of any kind working throughout the history of man. The simple fact that "Holy Books" exist attests to it not being totally blind. Now, one does have to do a narrowing study if they are historically accurate, lore, exaggeration, tribal superstition, plausible...etc. Are the claims totally outlandish? Is there any evidence that supports its claims? Was the writer/teacher/holy man crazy, malnourished, power hungry, a liar or truthful? So to say religion is totally blind faith is not accurate at all. I will agree for many it may be, but not all. Real faith is not blind, and has substance. I have done a fair amount of study on all religions, and have boiled it down to one. I've studied the humanities, and love scientific discovery. So no, not totally blind.
Amy Holton — March 29, 2012
How is 2003 in any way recent?
John P. Frade — March 31, 2012
Wow. That's great. If I don't pretend to answer to my wishful thinking, I'm capable of anything and can't be trusted. Wow.
Weekly List Bookmarks (weekly) | Eccentric Eclectica @ ToddSuomela.com — March 31, 2012
[...] Distrust for Atheists & the New Relevance of Faith » Sociological Images [...]
bobsta — April 1, 2012
I respect Americans because of their obvious creativity and commitment to democratic ideals. But this result simply could not happen in the UK or here, in Australia. We're constantly amazed when gansta rappers step up to the podium to accept a music award but first praise god! In Australia its going the other way. We've even seen a a new political party called the Sex Party set up here and pull 10% of the vote with a straight out call to ban religious groups from getting special favours and government handouts. Clearly this disdain and fear of atheists has much to do with the way America was founded. Its deeply ingrained into their psyche. But surely the modern life shows how stupid it is.
Anonymous — April 2, 2012
Your discussion, and its supporting statistics are both interesting and fascinating, especially within the context of American culture--I think that a similar survey in Europe, for example, would yield significantly different results
However, for we people of faith (e.g. I am Christian), not all of whom do not read theology in an historical context, or, even critiques of religion per se, even more alarming is the rise of the so-called "new atheists", as a vocal group, e.g. the late Christopher Hitchens, Richard Dawkins, and the U.K. export, Daniel Dennett, philosopher.
To we believers they appear to be filled with bitterness. Moreover, what have they to offer? A diatribe that religion is source of all the world's ills? Shall we not remember that during the Enlightenment in France, the art and treasures of the cathedrals were sacked, and banished from our heritage forever?
We may weep over the Buddhas of Bamiyan, yet not flinch when the pointless destructiveness of these, for the most part scientist partisans, seek to dismantle the deepest structures of our own religious heritage. And what have these positivist partisans have to offer in return? Little, I'd assert, than a bloodless stoicism, a retreat to Candide's foolish garden, and the prospect of making them better off by reading their own books.
Dave W — April 3, 2012
Wow - actually quite surprised: maybe it reflect the 'not religious but spiritual' as an underpinning: which excludes atheists. People respect faith (any faith) -but not its absence?
In http://dispirited.org/about-the-book/ I have tried (and maybe failed..) to set out a non-spiritual atheism that is also interested in ethics and building a fair, decent society: but maybe I should have kept my head down?
Hooskers — April 18, 2012
I tend to dislike most atheists, because the majority of the ones I have met rub me exactly the way a right wing Christian does... too intense and pushy. I don't know or care what I actually believe about god, because it hasn't been something I feel the need to make a final judgement on. So I don't need to be sold on why god doesn't exist, any more than I need to be sold on any religious preferences. It's all the same. Someone believes something, and they need everyone else to believe it too.
Blix — May 20, 2012
Which statement is easier to make factually? 1) There is no gold in China 2) There is gold in China
For the first to be true one must have searched every square centimetre of China, every tooth filling, every jewelry box, every acre of soil, etc. in order to make such a claim.
For the second to be true one must have only to find one fleck of gold somewhere.
How then, can an atheist claim that God does not exist? Have they searched everywhere? Are they trying to find Him, or covering their eyes to what they already see?
All I can say is that God has changed my life and many others that I know. It may only be a little fleck of what's to come, but I will go by what I know to be true.
Wallace — June 28, 2012
The story is wrong. This chart shows that Atheists are at the 50% mark, sufficient for an actual, specific, real, Atheist to get elected. The interesting lesson to learn from this graph is that homosexuals & jews have become very popular VERY fast. The slope on those lines is the steepest. How did they do it?
opeongo66 — September 2, 2013
I'm pretty sure when atheists outnumber the faithful, the faithful will be treated much better than the faithful ever treated an atheist. Says a lot about religion.
Robyn — November 30, 2022
As a young atheist and still learning about everything my stuff might not be so polished, and i doubt anyone will see this, but i will still show my views. I think ALL PEOPLE black, white, african-american, gay, trans, jew, christian, atheists, vegans, he, she, them, EVERYONE should be treated the same. So for you guys, next time you see an atheist or really anyone, treat them with respect.