Cross-posted at Ms.
Growing up in America, we learn that sweets and junk food are “guilty pleasures.” Women, especially, are supposed to refrain from such indulgences. And, if they cannot — if they, for example, desire more than that modest slice of cake served to each birthday guest — then they should feel not only guilt, but shame. For overindulging is grotesque and it, accordingly, should be hidden and kept secret.
This is the cultural background to Lee Price‘s realist paintings of women (mostly her) eating sweets and junk food. She draws two contrasts. First, she makes very public something we are supposed to do only in private. Not only do the paintings literally display the transgression, the birds eye view and frequent nudity exaggerates the sheer display of the indulgence. And, second, she takes something that is supposedly disgusting and shameful and presents it in a medium associated with (high) art, challenging the association of indulgence with poor character and a lack of refinement. Fascinating.
Visit Lee Price’s website.
Via BoingBoing.
Comments 64
Sarah — April 5, 2011
That's definitely an interesting contrast. Also interesting is the juxtaposition of nudity and indulgence, which is sort of like an indulgence of the mostly-socially acceptable variety (pornography/sex) with an indulgence of the not-socially-acceptable variety (food/sweets).
But I think women's relationship to food is actually more complex than that - just a blank "we're not supposed to indulge" directive. One facet of the food paradox is that women actually ARE supposed to indulge, and are rewarded for doing so, so long as they remain rail thin. As an example, a lot of news articles about models contain anecdotes about the model's voracious appetite - ie the reporter meets the model/actress for lunch and watches in amazement and respect while the model/actress wolfs down a juicy burger. It's also noteworthy the types of food that women are praised for eating - burgers, fries, and salty things are seen as commendable, "manly" indulgences, while sweets and desserts are bad, "female" indulgences only had during "that time of the month."
From a personal perspective, I've actually gotten a lot of compliments, almost always from men, on my appetite. Male coworkers love to point out how often and how much I eat while chuckling. It's only socially acceptable for them to do this because I am relatively thin.
Adrienne — April 5, 2011
The settings also remind me a lot of commercials targeted to women, outlining methods of "safe" indulgence. The sumptuousness of white clothing and white sheets reminds me a lot of some lingerie commercials (i.e., it's okay to indulge the outside of your body but not the inside), and some yogurt commercials (yogurt being the "safe" food for women to indulge in-- although I think Sarah Haskins covered that subject matter better than I ever could).
The bathroom setting recalls commercials too, I think: particularly of bath and beauty products which are increasingly food-scented and portrayed as acceptable forms of indulgence-- while it's considered unacceptable for women to indulge in EATING food, rubbing it all over their bodies is portrayed as an acceptable alternative (and, in the case of some commercials, declared to provide the same health benefits).
Lori A — April 5, 2011
I wish the woman looked... *happier* though. As is I feel like I'm watching the bingeing before the purging :-/
seasalt — April 5, 2011
Surely, though, this overindulgence is expected to be "private" only for a very narrow or particular demographic? I mean, all you need to do is walk into a Cracker Barrel restaurant or KFC's and you will see plenty of public "overindulgence"--not only by women, of course, but men and children too, from a range of socio-economic and racial backgrounds.
In other words, I don't find the "privacy" bit about these images entirely convincing.
m — April 5, 2011
Paintings? I didn't acrually believe it myself until I got a closer look at the ones on her site. Just amazing! Though I wouldn't agree that she's necessarily making the indulgence public. Sure, it's meant for the public to see, but so are all other pictures of intimate situations such as crying, sex or self harm. If they were really meant to push that boundary, I don't think that they would be set in bathrooms and bedrooms, the two most private rooms in our culture. On the other hand, you can't aruge that she does bring beauty into the eating, even a sort of serenety.
Jay Eff — April 5, 2011
The wide range of commentaries and questions this poses makes it such a fascinating art project, to me.
Cute Bruiser — April 5, 2011
What happened to the MPDG post?
Jen in SF — April 5, 2011
The model's dull expressions, plus the flat lighting, mades these images feel very empty and impersonal to me ... which is part of the binging message, granted. Maybe I've been playing too many horror video games, but "Cherry Cheesecake II" made me think "autopsy" as quickly as "indulgence."
Chlorine — April 6, 2011
The woman is so thin that I read these images as typical food advertisements until I read the description.
emme — April 6, 2011
Agreeing with some of the commenters above who mentioned EDs. The first 2 images struck me strongly as having that theme, which I saw before I read was the post which explained what they are actually about.
The others didn't really have such a strong impression on me, though I cant quite put my finger on what makes the first 2 so different.
[links] Link salad clogs its arteries | jlake.com — April 6, 2011
[...] The Deconstruction of Indulgence (NFSW) — Food, sensuality and art. [...]
Bill Angel — April 6, 2011
To me the images beg a question. If she needs to seclude herself in the bathroom in order to indulge her penchant for junk food and sugary soft drinks, from whom is she hiding? I think that she should expand her body of artistic work to include those friends and family members from whom she feels the need to conceal her addiction to sugary or high calorie food and drink. Is there a boyfriend with movie star good looks and physique from whom she fears rejection?
Ann Cardon — April 6, 2011
She should do a similar series now with an overweight woman as the model. The viseral reaction would be different I think, as would the comments.
Hmmm — April 6, 2011
No one has a problem with indulging. Just look at all ads encouraging you to do just that. ("Eat as much as you need! Eat as much as you want! Eat more than your body needs! OMG so delicioussss.")
What we have a problem with is obesity. If you're indulging and someone criticizes you for it, it's because you're too fat. If you indulge in moderation and stay healthy, you're fine.
This applies to both men and women, too. Isn't there a word for making something universal look like something sexist in order to delegitimize it? "Derailing" perhaps?
Rosemary — April 6, 2011
This reminds me that I've always had a problem with the concept of "guilt free" foods, which seems to be becoming more common these days. Maybe because it ties so heavily into fat-shaming and body policing.
I also didn't realize these were actually paintings until I looked really closely.
ka — April 7, 2011
She looks sad to me because she's all by herself, eating is a social activity. eating alone on the floor in a toilet isn't a happy/sexy thing, Also eating lying down is not comfortable - try it, you'll choke! It is not an enjoyable activity. It looks like these pictures are supposed to portray eating as shameful and disgusting and associate indulgence with eating disorders I don't see how they challenge any stereotypes they just reinforce stereotypes. There is nothing positive in these images.
(I'm not American however I don't really get these weight issues, I think it is just displacement activity.)
Arancini « What a Pavlova! — April 12, 2011
[...] I hear you girl. Been there. [...]
Artist Challenges Women’s Shame About Eating : Ms Magazine Blog — April 21, 2011
[...] from Sociological Images. Print | Email | [...]
SR — April 25, 2011
This makes me incredibly uncomfortable because it strikes me as very eating-disordered. The location of the food, the type of food and the amounts of it... I've binged and purged in bathrooms before.
So this was actually really triggering for me.
Portraits of Addiction: What Do Your See? | A Black Girl's Guide To Weight Loss — June 3, 2011
[...] This is the cultural background to Lee Price‘s realist paintings of women (mostly her) eating sweets and junk food. She draws two contrasts. First, she makes very public something we are supposed to do only in private. Not only do the paintings literally display the transgression, the birds eye view and frequent nudity exaggerates the sheer display of the indulgence. And, second, she takes something that is supposedly disgusting and shameful and presents it in a medium associated with (high) art, challenging the association of indulgence with poor character and a lack of refinement. Fascinating. [source] [...]
Michal Wolfe — June 15, 2011
SAD,, too sad,. amazed at her skill demonstrated with managing that many baths. Tried it yet in my home my children would find me. I managed many a tearful respite food in tow briefly in the rest room and bedroom. Vulnerability an exposure fits well in use of nudity. There are perhaps many who miss the warning signs for others to help. Think I will proactively share peace with my two daughters and a few others.
Moudou — June 23, 2011
Eating is a necessity, whether it is done "unsociably" or not. What keeps coming to mind is comparing this to drinking booze which is defined after the male id and so being tipsy or drunk is seen as a jolly jape a bit rascally. Doing that alone is seen as sad-afer all it is not been forced indoors for the shame of it.
I find it truly pathetic that wome eating is "transgressive" as well as how close being female is to being crazy, degenerate, dirty, wrong etc., It is getting beyond boring now.
Sheena Leversedge Wood — March 17, 2015
I like the bath ones. they look relaxed, and like they're having some nice, relaxed, self indulgence. the women are comfortable withe their bodies and their enjoyment of the food.
the others have a more negative and shameful feel about them.
Noah Graham — February 9, 2023
The deconstruction of indulgence refers to the process of breaking down and examining the excessive and unnecessary behaviors and habits that lead to waste and overconsumption. This process can be personal or societal in nature, and it involves a critical examination of the values and beliefs that drive excessive consumption. In our modern world, many people have become accustomed to a lifestyle of indulgence and excess. However, this way of living can be harmful to both the environment and our well-being. The deconstruction of indulgence involves a shift towards a more mindful and intentional way of living, one that prioritizes sustainability and balance. One aspect of this shift towards sustainability is reducing waste and minimizing our impact on the environment. Utah junk removal companies can play a crucial role in this process by providing individuals and businesses with the tools and services needed to effectively manage their waste.