“It was kind of unreal,” the Steamboat Springs, Colorado native said, describing his recent 34th birthday fete at Kandahar Airfield, better known as KAF. “At least for a few minutes, you could pretend you were somewhere else. It was like going back home” (source).
“I was expecting to arrive in a warzone but instead here I am wearing sunglasses in the sun and eating a baguette,” said Dimitra Kokkali, a NATO contractor newly arrived from Brussels. “On my first night I surprised my family by calling them from an outdoor rock concert” (source).
A Time magazine slideshow, titled “R&R at Kandahar Airfield,” uses images to describe how the busiest airport in the world “tries to re-create the comforts of home for the coalition forces in Afgahnistan.” Kandahar Airfield is the busiest airport in the world because all supplies and troops pass through on their way to or from war in Iraq or Afghanistan. At any given time there are about 25,000 service members and civilian contractors at the airfield.
These images of the Kandahar’s “Boardwalk” recreation area are striking for a few reasons. First, they show a blurring of the line dividing the homefront and the warfront. The slide show includes images of service members using FaceBook in computer labs, and eating meals in their fatigues at TGI Fridays.
Second, these images reflect that there is increasing emphasis on how service members are supported and cared for by the military during wartime. These photos show the side of war that is not about fighting and danger—instead, they are about the comfort and making a foreign land where they are fighting as “homelike” as possible.
Third, these show the blurring of the boundary between the military and privately owned businesses. Civilian Contractors are augmenting military personnel during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the inclusion of these civilian contractors in war zones has raised the issues of the safety of civilian workers and the costs of hiring corporations (Contexts).
Finally, as a consequence of the blurring of the boundaries of homefront and warfront, the division between the country of Afghanistan and the military is sharpened. Afghanis (except for those few with security clearance) are not allowed to shop or enjoy the free entertainment on the Boardwalk at Kandahar. Meanwhile, service members can safely buy souvenirs on the Boardwalk itself. Afghani culture is commodified as a tourist attraction in this theme park-like Boardwalk setting.
All of these images speak to the changing boundary between the homefront and the warfront, and as a result, changes in how we, as a country, view war. Instead of the images of brutality, death, and chaos that Americans saw in their living rooms on TV during Vietnam, for example, these images show the military taking care of service members who are being entertained, keeping in touch with loved ones, and having fun.
But as this service member describes, walking the Kandahar “Boardwalk” in a warzone is still a jarring experience:
“I couldn’t believe I was in Kandahar eating a double-dipped chocolate ice cream at sunset on a Saturday afternoon,” said Coleman, who was downing a strawberry smoothie from the French bakery behind him, where an Eiffel Tower climbs a wall above picnic tables with fake potted plants.
“It was a surreal experience,” he said, as a jet fighter roared across the sky, letting loose a stream of defensive white flares. “I remember thinking, ‘We’re in the heart of the war-zone. The bad guys are 10 miles away. And here we are eating soft-serve ice cream'” (source).
Wendy Christensen is a Visiting Assistant Professor at Bowdoin College whose specialty includes the intersection of gender,war, and the media.
Comments 24
Willow — December 27, 2010
But hasn't there often been a homefront/warfront blurring in the past--just, on the *other* front? One of the more remarkable aspects of the war in Iraq and Afghanistan is the extent to which it is isolated in the Middle East, far away from Americans outside military families. We went from Rosie the Riveter, buying war bonds, and rationing to, well, putting magnets on our SUVs.
Noanodyne — December 27, 2010
Downright chilling - one can easily see the slippery slope we're headed down.
Great information, thanks for this.
Jeremy — December 28, 2010
I can't describe why, but those photos are disturbing. I don't want to say that the soldiers should be out huddled in tents and eating C-rations, but it's striking that everyone's smiling, playing video games, going shopping, in the middle of an occupation.
On the other hand, I shouldn't be too surprised as this seems to be an updated version of the French in Indochina, the British in India, or the Americans in WWII France.
Boycott American Women — December 28, 2010
BOYCOTT AMERICAN WOMEN
Why American men should boycott American women
http://boycottamericanwomen.blogspot.com/
I am an American man, and I have decided to boycott American women. In a nutshell, American women are the most likely to cheat on you, to divorce you, to get fat, to steal half of your money in the divorce courts, don't know how to cook or clean, don't want to have children, etc. Therefore, what intelligent man would want to get involved with American women?
American women are generally immature, selfish, extremely arrogant and self-centered, mentally unstable, irresponsible, and highly unchaste. The behavior of most American women is utterly disgusting, to say the least.
This blog is my attempt to explain why I feel American women are inferior to foreign women (non-American women), and why American men should boycott American women, and date/marry only foreign (non-American) women.
BOYCOTT AMERICAN WOMEN!
caroline — December 28, 2010
There's also something about this that speaks to the US military wanting to create a complete bubble for its members. These same types of wholly integrated centers are built at every military installation as well. The military has now, somewhat revised their approach to housing and will claim that it wants to house its members out in the communities that the installation are built in or near, but it also turns around and puts every possible need that a soldier, Marine, sailor, etc and their family could have on the installation. It creates this bubble wherein the military and their families are meant to feel safe and special when the outside world is scary (and often military towns, especially those with a large number of younger members have high crime rates). It also allows the military to control the messages that people get. It's a whole world.
Noanodyne — December 28, 2010
Why are you letting the troll spam your comments, Gwen & Lisa?
John — December 28, 2010
I can assure you that not all soldiers have that experience in Afghanistan. Kandahar is a major base wiht tons of cash thrown at it. The smaller camps have very little in the way of creature comforts. I was in the southeastern corner at FOB Wazah Kwah, near a town with the same name. While I had an actual building to sleep in, it woud be considered roughing it when compared to Kandahar or Bagram. From a my perspective, all the amenities there are a waste of money as well as a misallocation of valuable military resources. Soldiers at these big "suburban mall" bases gain little in the way of the culture of the indigenous population. To boot, soldiers at these locations gain weight! I lost almost twenty pounds WHILE eating three meals a day!
I have never agreed with these bases. It is/was never a matter of 'who has what' or 'they got it better', it is a sense of pragmatics. How is the military going to effectively participate in battle against a tenacious foe all the while thinking about all the things Corporate America wills its blindly subjective citizens to adhere to?
Melissa — December 28, 2010
This is a really interesting post, but I wanted to comment on your statement that "Very little of the reality of Armed Service—fighting in battles, conducting raids, patrolling boarders—is portrayed to families." Though the reality for a minority of military personnel, your statement isn't the reality for most, even those who are currently serving in combat zones (unless you're counting just army, in which case I have no idea). Most work in normal non-fighting positions, such as desk jobs and other support positions. I'm not discounting those who are in dangerous combat positions, but most aren't. I have close family who served in Iraq and Afghanistan. During my father's entire time in Iraq, mortars landed on base, but other than that he was in no danger whatsoever and most people on base were in the same situation. My sister, who escorted generals off-base in Afghanistan, was shot at more than once. However, even she spent very little time in that dangerous of a position.
So, yes, there are definitely service men and women who fight in battles, conduct raids and patrol borders. However, the vast majority of personnel don't and will be doing exactly what you see in these photos: hanging out during their off-time (if any). Most just don't have a whole lot to do and showing pictures of people reading books isn't that exciting to see. The photos may be a bit of propaganda and the base may be a bit ridiculous, but they are a reality and I wouldn't say they're necessarily inaccurate or misleading as your statement may lead one to believe.
Sheena Roetman — December 29, 2010
This is a far cry from the average experience in Afghanistan.
nina — January 2, 2011
The military isn't just "creating a bubble" when creating fully functional self contained bases. Military members and families are moving constantly,they are often very young and often poor. Many families have one car and young wives with children.Living on base in addition to aiding with comraderie for the soldiers, allows families to live close to the military hospital and other support services and have easy access and transportation.
Oh and the reality of military life is NOT combat,combat is the exception even now that we are at war. Even long term career soldiers who have been in 30 years may have spent *only* 4 years at war,and not 4 consecutive years. I know plenty of career soldiers who have spent 30 years in the military and never seen combat or been deployed.Combat is an occurence, is scary and dangerous but for most people it is a very small percentage of their time in service.
Juliet — January 12, 2011
I'm surprised nobody has yet pointed out a couple of errors in word choice. A person from Afghanistan is an Afghan, and the currency of the country is the Afghani. The adjective form is also Afghan, not Afghani.
Thanks for the interesting pictures!
Carolyn — April 4, 2011
You wrote "boarders" instead of "border." That's all.
Otherwise, I have nothing to say except that this was really interesting!
Daftar PokerIDN — June 2, 2018
My family members all the time say that I am wasting my time here at web,
except I know I am getting familiarity daily by reading thes pleasant content.
download — December 24, 2018
Have you ever considered creating an e-book or guest authoring on other
sites? I have a blog centered on the same subjects you discuss and would love to have you share some stories/information. I know my visitors would enjoy your work.
If you are even remotely interested, feel free to shoot me an email.
Andrewspreckley — March 9, 2021
Thanks for these Informations....Really interesting and Appreciated.
I was also a Nato Contractor...
Regards:
Andrew Leslie Spreckley