In honor of yesterday’s game, we’re re-posting two of our favorite football-related posts. This one and one about how much of a three-hour televised NFL games actually involves the game itself.
MontClair SocioBlog’s Jay Livingston posted the wickedly creative football play embedded below. The play, pulled off by Driscoll Middle School’s football team (Corpus Christi, TX), is a wonderful example of the importance of a shared understanding of context. Watch the clip:
Understanding the context of interaction heavily influences what you say and do and how you interpret others’ speech and actions. The behavior that you exhibit on a first date, for example, is very different than the behavior you exhibit in your professor’s office hours, or at Thanksgiving, or at a sports bar with your buddies. The situation shapes whether or not you can get away with bragging, farting, or being withdrawn, drunk, or loquacious. And it shapes what we expect from others too. In other words, we often think we know who we are, but who we are actually changes quite dramatically from situation to situation.
In this case, the offense did something entirely unexpected given the understanding of the context. He isn’t supposed to just get up and walk through the defensive line. And, so, when he did, the defense took several seconds to figure out what to do. It’d be like your Grandma getting drunk at Thanksgiving (maybe) or your partner farting on the first date; such behaviors are confounding because it involves deviating from the script determined by the situation. In Livingston’s words:
In this middle-school football play, the quarterback and center do something unusual for someone in those roles. They don’t violate the official rulebook, but their behavior is outside the norms of the game everyone knows. What’s going on? The defense looks around to the others for their cue as to what to do. They see the offensive line motionless in their stances, and they see their own teammates too looking uncertain rather than trying to make a tackle. So nobody defines the play as having started. But it has. Only when the quarterback, having walked past eight definitionless players, starts running do they arrive at an accurate definition, and by then, it’s too late. Touchdown.
See also our post about virtuoso violinist Joshua Bell in the subway.
Lisa Wade, PhD is an Associate Professor at Tulane University. She is the author of American Hookup, a book about college sexual culture; a textbook about gender; and a forthcoming introductory text: Terrible Magnificent Sociology. You can follow her on Twitter and Instagram.
Comments 40
Keydar — December 28, 2010
Woah.
I just read through some of the comments on the video at Youtube. I was curious as to why the video had so many dislikes, apparently the play was too "pussy" and "gay." Pretty telling about a completely different issue.
Why oh why did I read the comments. That'll learn me.
Dragonclaws — December 28, 2010
I imagine the defense assumed from the offense's behavior that the game wasn't in session, that something was up and he needed to discuss something with somebody, which is why it's a surprise that he starts off running and that the play's considered a rather underhanded move.
Woz — December 28, 2010
If you know what's going on here, you can actually take the context argument further. The coach was on the sidelines complaining that the last play should have been a penalty on the defense and thus they were owed a 5-yard walkoff before the play started. So the quarterback pretends to march the ball forward 5 yards as if he's helping the refs out by relocating the ball before the next play. And then he takes off.
So it wasn't actually that the defense was in a context they were unfamiliar with, the play actually works because the quarterback's actions put them in the context of an event (a dead-ball penalty walk off) where they're specifically not supposed (and not even allowed to) tackle the opposing player, hence why they all watch the guy walk through the defense without touching him.
Dan — December 28, 2010
There was a similar play in a recent college football game, with video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2vAuBIDl4t8&feature=related
In essence, most of the offensive line are standing, looking over at the coach, the running back has his hand on his ear as if he can't hear what's being shouted from the sideline, the receiver has his hands on his hips, etc. The only people "ready" are the center, the quarterback, and the one receiver who runs past the entire defense who are still waiting for the play to start.
Syd — December 28, 2010
That's kind of adorable!
I think the kids' age may play into it as well. They probably have to abide by a lot more safety/liability rules than older players, as well as more 'fairness' rules (playing baseball in grade school, the league only 'allowed' a certain number of points per team per inning so the other team wouldn't get their feelings hurt too bad by losing horribly). They're probably still used to listening to authority figures (in this case, coaches and referees) unquestioningly. This is not just 'this is unusual, therefore it is wrong,' but it's that combined with 'this is against the rules, did the adults tell them to do that? Let's look to an adult for what WE should do!' I imagine college or pro players would be confused as well, but I would also predict more reaction than looking at the ref.
PO — December 28, 2010
Truly disgusting play for a coach to teach kids. It's one thing if you've played the game for years and you at least have the instinct to smash the QB in this case, but this is just plain taking advantage of kids before they've developed football instincts.
bah — December 28, 2010
gotta love little #19 though, he caught on very quickly!
Kyra — December 29, 2010
This kind of reminds me of the way people will follow the cue of others' behavior in deciding what status to ascribe to a stranger in the vicinity.
Specifically, I recall a magazine article awhile ago about how the magazine had sent a random woman into a club, with an entourage, including security, paparazzi, groupies, and a few stealth people to say things like "OMG it's Lia!" (or whatever her name was). Pretty soon everybody was reacting as though a real celebrity was present, and despite nobody knowing who she was they all were acting like they did, discussing her next CD and things like that. Eventually she faked a high-drama cell phone call and left in a hurry, leaving the club speculating behind her about what it was about.
The same thing happened in, I think, one of those "what happens in Vegas" commercials, two guys trading off being the big hot shot dude and the chauffeur/personal assistant. You get one person to help the illusion that you have status like that, and everyone else is likely to accept it.
Ed Hovey — December 29, 2010
There is another context here also, at this age (middle school) the coaching staff should not be creating and calling trick plays. This is a time where most (obviously not this set of coaches) are supposed to teaching game skills and fair play. So the coaches are taking advantage of an understanding other coaching in the league would have also, that all the teams would be playing fair. I would be surprised if the referees did not call a penalty on the offense for unsportsmanlike conduct and call the play back.
ow — December 29, 2010
TeeHee! This is my hometown and as I was in marching band in high school, I saw a LOT of football. This was fun--a bit theatrical and dramatic. And as I was also a theater kid in high school, I definitely would have enjoyed the game much more if I saw more plays like this.
Liza — December 29, 2010
It's SMART. It's not a "trick" at all, and the other team just might have learned something about awareness from it.
Some of the comments floating around bashing this kid (or his coach, for that matter) are really ridiculous ...
Addamm — September 25, 2012
this is no different then the ole bucket of blood .... it is a play you can only use once in a season and never again ... however it follows the rules and took some ingenuity to devise and isnt that after all what football is all about .... designing plays that will out smart and confuse the other team
Gman E Willikers — February 4, 2013
This sort of play is an abuse of the game. The other team assumes you are going to, at a minimum, play by the unwritten rules of honor, which permit plays designed to create confusion/deception but still assume you are willing to engage in an honest athletic contest. Nearly all coaches despise this sort of trick play, which only works because it ticks the opponent to unilaterally suspend its own end of the competition. It is rare because most adults understand that it is repugnant and teaches children a horrible lesson.
Youth Football Trick Play “another five yards” “hey we have the wrong ball” | Note To Self — February 6, 2013
[...] Wade; Context: How Do You Play Football?; In Her Blog (Sociological Images); [...]
Kerry Smith — October 16, 2023
I have never played football, but I like to watch the passions that flare up during the game of two cool football teams. If you are a football fan, you will certainly enjoy playing with this online bookmaker https://melbet.com with high odds. And all newcomers to the betting site can expect huge bonuses for their first deposit.
Ricco — April 15, 2024
This play is a fascinating example of how deeply context influences our perception and reactions in sports, as in life. It cleverly exploits the typical expectations of what's about to happen in a game setting. While it's certainly unexpected and a little deceptive, it also highlights the importance of constant awareness and readiness, no matter the scenario. It’s reminiscent of those unexpected moments in professional games that catch even the best off guard, much like managing unexpected events in games like retro bowl. What an inventive way to shake up conventional gameplay and challenge the norms!