Andi M. sent in a video created by J.C. Penney called “The Doghouse.” The ad tells the story of men sent to the doghouse by their wives for various bad behaviors, but mostly for giving bad Christmas gifts. A bad gift is a non-romantic gift, or a gift that is related to housework, or that implies a woman needs to lose weight or change her appearance:
As Andi points out, the ad portrays men as idiots or even actively mean-spirited. But I’m also interested in the way we define what are appropriate gifts for women. We often see “practical” gifts as perfectly acceptable to give to men. But increasingly, gifts for women are supposed to be essentially romantic, a symbol of love, not usefulness, a cultural trend the jewelry industry, in particular, has encouraged and benefited from.
In this ad, we have several “bad” gifts — more computer memory, a vacuum cleaner, facial hair remover, and a work-out accessory. All are presented as equally idiotic choices for men to make. So getting a woman something that might significantly improve her computer is just the same as giving her something to work out with, while actively mocking her body and eating habits. Any non-romantic gift is risky, even if accompanied by an attempt to be sweet (see the poor computer memory guy).
I’ve discussed before research on low-income women who complain when they feel that men waste money on romantic but non-essential gifts rather than stuff they actually need. On the other hand, I asked one of my classes about what they would consider an acceptable gifts, and I was (probably stupidly) surprised that many of the women in the class were adamant that useful or helpful items were nice to get, but only in addition to a romantic gift, never as the “main” gift itself. A couple said they’d feel bad if their female friends were showing off jewelry they got for Valentine’s Day or Christmas and they didn’t have anything to show, because their friends would assume their boyfriends/husbands weren’t romantic or didn’t love them very much. So it was less about whether they wanted jewelry than that they knew other women did, and thus feared their friends would judge their relationships if they didn’t get the right gift to “prove” they had good partners.
I think ads like this both reflect and reinforce this social pressure to buy the “right” kind of gifts for women. J.C. Penney tapped into an existing cultural norm about what kinds of gifts women want, and then reinforces it by presenting jewelry as the only means available to men to get out of the doghouse, and shows all women as being in complete agreement about what an acceptable gift is.
UPDATE: Reader Josh Leo pointed out that the ad also portrays the doghouse as a place men are tortured by having to do feminine things:
…all they are fed in “the doghouse” is Quiche and Chai Latte’s. This is clearly a statement that these foods are feminine an almost a form of torture for “Real Men.”
Comments 55
Vidya — December 17, 2010
I think you're onto something with the discussion of social class here. Jewelery becomes 'the' expected gift not just because it's been given romantic cultural connotations, often costs a lot, and can easily be shown off -- it's also a symbol that a man can afford to spend money on non-essential things (and that a woman is well-off enough to not 'need' practical gifts).
Liza — December 17, 2010
More computer memory would be a great gift!
Josh Leo — December 17, 2010
Not to mention that all they are fed in "the doghouse" is Quiche and Chai Latte's. This is clearly a statement that these foods are feminine an almost a form of torture for "Real Men." For the record, I love both!
LexieDi — December 17, 2010
I really hate the jewelry companies have been hawking. Honestly, getting something like "the open heart pendant" or the "love knot" or the circle or the chain of diamonds that grow larger as they go... They're all "symbols" of love that are made up for you. It takes no real thinking. I'd rather have my boyfriend think about it, think about me and get the gift he thinks is best for me, not best for a woman. If he sits and thinks about it and goes "Gee, she really works hard to vacuum the floor, and that machine is so old, it's always breaking on her," and he got me a new vacuum, that MEANS something.
Personally, I don't like jewelry that much. I like having one piece of jewelry from my boyfriend that I can wear every day. If I have seven necklaces from him, for me, it kind of loses meaning.
My boyfriend isn't always spot on with his gifts, and neither am I. But the point is, when we shop for one another, we think about one another.
Kyra — December 17, 2010
Interestingly enough, reserving Christmas gifting for a non-useful gift like jewelry ensures that any needed item, and many useful items, will be purchased sometime in the future anyway.
It's a very consumerist practice to reserve a near-mandatory buy-something slot for an effectively useless item, effectively ensuring that two things will be purchased (at some point along the line) instead of one, as would be the case if you bought someone a thoughtful, needed or wanted gift that is something they'd buy at some point anyway.
Case in point: I'm getting a Dremel tool for Christmas, which I requested because of plans to use it in the creation of artwork. If they were to for some reason buy me a new necklace or something instead, I'd be buying that Dremel within the next few pay periods anyway. I would not, on the other hand, feel the need to address the lack of that particular necklace. So they essentially make an unnecessary sale by creating an unnecessary expectation, times several million, probably.
Mashed Potatoes — December 17, 2010
Is it a step forward for women not to be excited about receiving a vacuum cleaner for Christmas? I'm reminded of that vintage ad for Hoover, with a housewife laying down next to a brand new vacuum. It might come off a little sexist to promote buying big ticket cleaning appliances for your wife/ladyfriend/significant other.
..But it would be a hell of a lot more useful that a bland, or often times, ugly piece of blood diamond and gold.
Personally, the memory gift and punny note would be adorable. The gym membership isn't a bad idea, if both use it.
PS: I wonder how much they spent on that commercial. That was some serious budget for a 5 minute commercial on some dinky jewelry.
elly — December 17, 2010
I first saw this ad in 2008, when a (male) colleague of mine posted it on the bodybuilding forum that I (help) moderate. He thought it was: "...one of the most original (and funny!) marketing schemes I have seen in a long time." Most of the guys who posted follow up comments agreed. I (along with one other woman) basically rolled our eyes.
I appreciated Amanda Marcotte's take on it: http://pandagon.net/index.php/site/comments/diamonds_to_hold_you_over_until_february/
JL — December 17, 2010
It also taps into the persecution complex of (primarily) white "macho" middle class males that's being reinforced endlessly in the political realm. A narrative of how they're under constant scrutiny, attack, and imprisoned in a system they didn't know about.
Luey — December 17, 2010
This made me think about gift giving and privilege. My husband and I are technically poor, though we have many more resources than most in this category (he's a grad student and I have a master's degree). What we really need for Christmas is money. Money to pay for our utilities, his tuition, and our unexpected trip to the emergency veterinary clinic (100$ just to walk in the door! Don't worry, the cat is ok). But all of our loved ones have said something along the lines of "but you shouldn't get a gift of something you NEED! It should be something you WANT!" Well, I want to keep turning on the lights and taking warm showers.
If people have always been in the privileged position of being able to take care of those necessary expenses, it seems curmudgeonly or joyless to give needed gifts.
Syd — December 17, 2010
This is so strange to me, and by 'this,' I mean the ad industry's insistence that THEY, as opposed to your partner, know what said partner wants as a gift. We're regularly told that gift cards are wrong, vacuums are wrong, kitchen appliances are wrong, computer accessories are wrong, etc. But I know women who would not only not mind getting those items, but ACTIVELY DESIRE THEM. And some women who'd be offended. Part of it seems dependent on age (I know very few women in their 20s who'd be all 'yay vacuum cleaner!' but plenty of women in their 40s and 50s), and it also depends on their needs and hobbies. If a woman's vacuum cleaner is broken and she asks for a new one, why go out and buy her a necklace she didn't ask for? A kitchen appliance may be offensive to a woman who doesn't typically cook, but for a woman who cooks as a hobby it's the best gift ever. If you gave me computer memory my reaction would be 'what the heck is this for?' but I have friends who'd die of happiness. The issue here is that J.C. Penney is not encouraging men to actually be more thoughtful (which would be manifested by, say, knowing your spouse's interests or asking them what they want for Christmas), they are saying 'all women want sparkly necklaces 100% of the time for all occasions.'
Von — December 17, 2010
Sad to be so influenced by advertising and so shallow to let it form wants and needs.
Treefinger — December 17, 2010
Has this not been posted on this very site before? I'm getting major deja vu here.
ashley — December 18, 2010
@Treefinger, me too! I thought I was going crazy!
Rachael — December 18, 2010
At first I thought this was a step forward, since I thought that it might be about clothes instead of jewelry. Still not the most progressive thing ever, but at least clothes are practical and less expensive. As someone who hates vacuuming, and someone who is constantly at battle with her weight, I would be extremely offended if my partner got me a vacuum or a workout device.
But I already began to see problematic elements in the ad. First, there's the heteronormativity. Then, there's the whole thing about the man who "lost his mind" after staying in the doghouse for too long, which I found to be insensitive towards people with psychiatric disabilities.
And regardless of what the "step forward" was, you don't replace certain stereotypes about women with others. That's not progressive at all.
Scrooge — December 18, 2010
I hate gift-giving, because I have absolutely no talent for it whatsoever (If I get a gift, and it's not the 90% of the time where I have completely misjudged and gotten the person something they'll never want or use, then it's the 10% where I've gotten somebody a gift they already have). I hate receiving good gifts for this same reason, because I know I have to return the favor and I won't be able to do it. I actually like getting bad gifts because then I don't feel terrible about getting other people bad gifts. Does anybody else have this horrible anxiety about gift-giving? I guess not, because these ads capitalize on it, but I have it to such a degree that I really just would rather not get gifts, ever...
Frankly, I think people shouldn't give as many gifts as they do in general. I think it'd save a lot of money and stress if Christmas and other socially obligated gift-giving occasions ceased to exist. Can't I show my appreciation for somebody by treating them to a nice dinner? Or by giving them money? Or helping them around the house? I could do it all, but buying specific objects for people is just something that is so beyond my skill set.
Alice — December 18, 2010
I think one of the key points you're missing here is that most men would PREFER a practical gift over a sentimental one, while the reverse would be true for women.
Also I find it interesting that there is considerably more pressure on men when it comes to gifts than women. You don't really see many allusions to women giving crap gifts (or making a verbal faux pas) and being "sent to the doghouse" by their husbands or boyfriends. I suppose that's because men won't achieve the desired effect if they withhold sex from their partners (which is, at its core, what the doghouse is really about).
KP — December 18, 2010
I am surprised this hasn't been said in comments yet, but I think the reason the vacuum is so offensive is not because it's practical-- but because it assumes that not only is she the one who actually is/should be doing all the vacuuming, but that he's doing her some big old favor by making it easier for her when really the jerk should maybe help out with the housework more in the first place. Or even worse--the gift assumes that she really likes vacuuming because it's a stereotypically female activity.
Would it be different if they were broke? Sure. My partner and I are pretty broke right now, but I would still rather get a homemade treat or a back rub or a used book or something inexpensive but thoughtful and budget for the new vacuum together--not act like it's some special treat instead of a symbol of household drudgery we both share.
I think what's actually offensive about this ad, and I'm little irked no one has said it, is that it positions women as somehow irrational and sentimental for wanting jewelery or something non-practical when it seems like they are actually offended because their partners didn't give a crap to think about what they actually would *enjoy.* And plenty of stereotypical "dude" gifts, like sports tickets, golf equipment or gadgets are no less "practical" that jewelery, but we don't acknowledge that.
katerina — December 18, 2010
Now that I've taken time to watch the full ad - 1. red sweater guy, Donny? Seems like he'd be a jerk to be married to. It wasn't just thoughtless getting his wife a thighmaster, he ridiculed her appearance, and not for nothing, she was not thin as a stick, and I'm not sure this would have been as good to show someone who fit the image of someone in an ad needing to work off a couple pounds, which is a different issue, but what exactly was his complaint? She looked pretty good. 2. Not that many men in the doghouse! 3. Pretty much a given that doghouse is code language for sex; the ad didn't really mention what happens when you get the "right" gift is not just staying out of the doghouse, but women still feel obligated to "reciprocate" sexually, whether they have also gotten him a material gift or not - diamonds=laid to-nite! to a man, what a shrew his woman would be if she did not agree, I think that was missed but we all know that is how it goes.
I got distracted for a while and still reading comments on that pandagon link someone posted - a few puzzling comments on what could a woman possibly get a man that is as impractical and boring, like cufflinks. Yes, get the man some cufflinks because he probably won't like them, so maybe he will wonder how to reciprocate when he gets some fancy, expensive, impersonal gift. I know it's passive-aggressive, and an expensive waste of money but I'm serious. Why get him something he'll actually enjoy if he's taking shortcuts at the jewelry store, buys you something as unsatisfactory to you as a vacuum cleaner, but you have to pretend to like it, not just an ordinary amount, but A LOT? You can't just open a velvet box and say, OH, I hate this! How thoughtless of you! Get in the doghouse! And he's thinking it's worth at least 10 BJs in a row and he's ready for them as soon as company leaves.
CkT — December 19, 2010
Ok so if "the doghouse" represents the period of time that your S.O. is 'torturing' you for being insensitive, the loudspeaker announcement is telling the men what they need to do to get out...well, why aren't the men doing these things? They seem not even to notice... i.e. when women give clear/obvious statements of what they want, without hinting, men still will not respond. Yea- these ad makes it seem as though men are just inherently dumb. And p.s. if you don't want a bad gift, why not just ask for what you want?
B-ron — December 19, 2010
This ad really gets to the heart of why I just gave up and started fucking other guys. God bless my Kinsey-2!
The Holiday Ad Bombardment, or “Money Can’t Buy Happiness- That’s What Shopping’s For” | Women's Interviews - The Daily Femme — December 20, 2010
[...] JC Penny does more than merely suggest a holiday helper, or a great gift. The Jewelry department sponsored a five-minute advertisement outlining which gifting mistakes most frequently lead to “the dog house.” The gist of the epic ad is that any non-whimsical, non-romantic, or (possibly most importantly) non-shinny gift is not just bad—it is unforgivably inconsiderate. The men in the doghouse were all sent there after making a fatal gift, ranging from the sweet-yet-dorky gift of extra computer memory (with a note saying, thanks for the great memories), to a new vacuum cleaner (which the man apparently really researched and tried to buy a good one), to a piece of exercise equipment (accompanied by snide comments about his wife’s physical appearance). Because as any real woman will tell you, all of those gifts are equally offensive. Why are they equally offensive? Well, mainly because they aren’t jewelry. [...]
kait — December 21, 2010
I would love one of those really good mini-vacuums for Christmas... the kind you can use to clean your car. :)
Agree completely that the one-upmanship over romantic gifts is just that; competition over who has the sweetest boyfriend or husband. I fully embrace that I'm affected by this too. My engagement ring diamond fell out out of the setting, and I replaced the ring with a huge cubic zirconia. I could have chosen one the same size, but I felt compelled to wear a big rock. My husband thought it was kind of hilarious, because neither of us thinks it's a good idea to spend $10,000 on a gemstone.
frederick gragg — July 26, 2024
BeyondMemories crafts unforgettable experiences through timeless photography, capturing life's most precious moments with artistry and passion. Our mission is to transform memories into treasures that last a lifetime, blending creativity with cutting-edge technology to deliver stunning visuals that tell your unique story. Whether it's a wedding, a family portrait, or a corporate event, we specialize in preserving emotions and details that transcend time. With https://beyond-memories.com/, every click of the camera is a journey into cherished memories, ensuring each frame resonates with authenticity and beauty. Trust us to transform your moments into everlasting legacies, one snapshot at a time.