Today Californians vote as to whether to legalize marijuana. Chris Uggen at Public Criminology explains:
This measure (1) legalizes various marijuana-related activities, (2) allows local governments to regulate these activities, (3) permits local governments to impose and collect marijuana-related fees and taxes, and (4) authorizes various criminal and civil penalties.
There is a chance that the measure will pass; Gallup polls of U.S. opinion show that support for legalization has grown over time:
What will happen if California becomes the first state to legalize marijuana is the stuff of speculation or, more generously, modeling. Uggen points to the work of scholars employed at the RAND Drug Policy Research Center (Beau Kilmer, Jonathan P. Caulkins, Rosalie Liccardo Pacula, Robert J. MacCoun, and Peter H. Reuter). According to their models:
(1) the pretax retail price of marijuana will substantially decline, likely by more than 80 percent. The price the consumers face will depend heavily on taxes, the structure of the regulatory regime, and how taxes and regulations are enforced;
(2) consumption will increase, but it is unclear how much, because we know neither the shape of the demand curve nor the level of tax evasion (which reduces revenues and prices that consumers face);
(3) tax revenues could be dramatically lower or higher than the $1.4 billion estimate provided by the California Board of Equalization (BOE); for example, uncertainty about the federal response to California legalization can swing estimates in either direction;
(4) previous studies find that the annual costs of enforcing marijuana laws in California range from around $200 million to nearly $1.9 billion; our estimates show that the costs are probably less than $300 million; and
(5) there is considerable uncertainty about the impact of legalizing marijuana in California on public budgets and consumption, with even minor changes in assumptions leading to major differences in outcomes.
In other words, it’s really hard to tell what the consequences of legalizing marijuana will be! Uggen urges caution.
Lisa Wade, PhD is an Associate Professor at Tulane University. She is the author of American Hookup, a book about college sexual culture; a textbook about gender; and a forthcoming introductory text: Terrible Magnificent Sociology. You can follow her on Twitter and Instagram.
Comments 26
Ricky — November 2, 2010
What the hell has happened to you left coast hippies? You can't even consider legalizing your hooch without adding new government regulations and taxes. That's not too groovy man, it's no wonder that California is so screwed up these days.
Alll — November 2, 2010
"Californian’s" here is incorrect.
Sisi — November 2, 2010
Legalizing pot would only be subject to a tax on the lazy who just want to buy it. More people would grow pot if it were legal.
Pot Bakeries will pop up in every town I'm sure.
Niki — November 2, 2010
I'm surprised that the pre-tax price would be lower. One thing I've noticed where I'm from (Ottawa) is that the price of pot has remained more or less unchanged for ten years. I smoked a lot back in high school and don't really smoke much anymore - and certainly haven't purchased any in years - but I know, from talking to my friends who still smoke a lot, that the standard cost is still 10$ per gram. That's exactly what it cost ten years ago. Does inflation really take that much longer to hit the drug market? Either we were being gouged back then, or the dealers are taking a hit today, because inflation on pretty much all legally sold products has been nuts in the past ten years.
(Note: while some drugs fluctuate in price depending on the quality and the seller and yada yada, particularly high-end stuff like cocaine, that just doesn't seem to be the case with marijuana when you're buying small, personal-use quantities. Seriously - in the three or so years that I smoked weed daily, I think I paid 12$ for a gram like two or three times, and everything else I ever smoked was exactly 10$ per gram. Canadian, of course.)
Anonymous — November 2, 2010
What no guesses or estimates on reduced violence!!
j-p — November 2, 2010
Wow, the hippie vote in 1970 is a lot weaker than I thought. Maybe they were too stone to answer a survey?
sparkles — November 2, 2010
what about the increases in tourism money as well?
market the destination as a pot smokers haven...
Bri — November 2, 2010
Ugh, that's going to make it really hard to save for my kid's college
Ricky — November 3, 2010
LOL UP.IN.SMOKE
I wonder how many stoners are waking up on their couches this morn, er uh, afternoon in California and realizing that they forgot vote for pot! I swear, you guys can screw up anything. Seriously, you elect Moonbeam for governor again, but somehow manage to not legalize pot? Hilarious, might as well go get some Twinkies.
T — November 3, 2010
Wow... I'm impressed with the Gallup Poll! It almost precisely reflects the final outcome. Yes 46.2% and No 53.8%