Doris G. sent in this commercial for Jack & Jones jeans, in which a man laments the way that women just want to use him for sex:
The website indicates that if you go to a store and buy a jacket, you can get a pair of headphones that come in packages that show different versions of Girl Toys. Here’s the “bad boy rebel wearing a bomber jacket”:
You can also choose from the “outdoor living macho dude wearing a wool coat,” “casual cool big-city guy wearing a peacoat,” and “urban sports hunk wearing a soft-shell jacket.”
Of course, the reason this works — the reason it’s supposed to be funny instead of disturbing — is because of gendered ideas about sex (masculine) and romance (feminine). Men are generally assumed to want sex any time they can get it, and to be able to completely separate it from emotions and love and such. Truly masculine sex is no-strings-attached sex for physical pleasure. The idea that a guy would be disturbed because hordes of conventionally attractive women want to have wild sex with him but require no greater commitment, is laughable if you accept an ideology in which that’s how girls act.
This ideology obscures the reality that men do want to make emotional connections with their partners. Michael Kimmel summarizes the research on gender and relationships in his textbook, The Gendered Society (2nd edition, 2004):
Men, it seems, are more likely to believe myths about love at first sight, tend to fall in love more quickly than women, are more likely to enter relationships out of a desire to fall in love, and yet also tend to fall out of love more quickly. Romantic love, to men, is irrational, spontaneous, and compelling emotion that demands action… (p. 227)
But the masculinization of sex discourages men from thinking about sex in terms of emotional (as opposed to primarily physical) satisfaction and prevents us from acknowledging that boys and men can, in fact, be uncomfortable with women’s advances, or even be sexually victimized by women (see our posts here and here).
Comments 17
Chase — October 19, 2010
The closing links appear to be broken...
Derangierte Einsichten - Quickie: Männer und Romantik — October 19, 2010
[...] (Quelle) [...]
Brian — October 19, 2010
Truly masculine sex is no-strings-attached sex for physical pleasure
This isn't quite right. Doing anything for pleasure is generally cast as feminine. In the extreme masculine limit, sex is just something you have to do, like breathing, say. (Compare to say how masculine food advertising doesn't emphasize that it tastes good, but that it necessarily addresses hunger, or provides energy.)
Bagelsan — October 19, 2010
Of course, the reason this works — the reason it’s supposed to be funny instead of disturbing — is because of gendered ideas about sex (masculine) and romance (feminine). Men are generally assumed to want sex any time they can get it, and to be able to completely separate it from emotions and love and such.
I think that's only part of the reason it works as "funny" -- there is also not the huge history of men as a class being treated like sex toys by women, and being objectified by women, that the reverse case has. Men being treated as toys by women is partially seen as laughable because it's supposed to be an awesome situation for the man, but also because it's supposed to be so far-fetched and impossible that there is no actual threat of it happening.
A woman, being told that certain clothes would make lots of men want to use her for sex and then cast her aside, would likely be more disturbed because it's not considered outside the realm of possibility. And she's probably been told something similar in all seriousness before, where as men don't tend to get nearly as many cautionary tales about what will happen to them if they dress a certain way.
Lenneth — October 19, 2010
Wait, that was supposed to be funny? I just found it disturbing. Tragic, almost. If it hadn't flagged itself as an advert I might've assumed it was a kind of gender-flip deconstruction of ideas of sex/romance and gender.
Norm — October 19, 2010
The western vidw of 'romantic love' is a pecular form of emotional cocktail with possibly bourgeois origins and a possessive, consumptive and almost controlling streak in places. We men do indeed have emotions and tend to form emotional connections with people we like, but if men (I take it we're discussing men-under-patriarchy) typically fall in love more easily this could be a culturally induced cocktail for control rather than a genuine expression of the underlying and suppressed need for intimacy/free interaction.
Reggie — October 19, 2010
Yeah I hate when women act like this too. Women are just pigs. I've got a mind, I'm more than just tubesteak or a side of beef. I'm got a brain, I can think!!!!!
I'm more than just a good old Alabama black snake. I'm a person.
TT — October 20, 2010
I'm confused. That was supposed to be funny? And they make an ad with a sad sounding guy who is NOT happy about being a "girl toy"? Why should anyone buy such cloths if - according to the ad - they make you unhappy?
Inny — October 20, 2010
When I walked past an jack and jones store a couple of weeks a go I saw the dressed up dolls in front of the windows in the same toy package as is seen at the end of the commercial. It was...strange to say the least.
Retour Quickie: Männer, Romantik und Lust « Alles Evolution — October 20, 2010
[...] Galle und meint eine Widerlegung von Pickup und Biologie in diesem von ihm zitierten Abschnitt (via) gefunden zu [...]
KarenM — October 25, 2010
What I find most interesting about this post is the number of comments on it. 16. Before me. If this were an advertisment encouraging women to become boytoys I suspect there would be many many more, very outraged comments. I just find that interesting.
Regarding the advertisements themselves, I found them disturbing. Like a previous commentator I thought initially that it was a sort of gender flip video, and was disappointed when it wasn't - it was just another video making a joke of objectification.