This “Onslaught” ad by Dove has garnered a lot of attention and positive press:
The idea, of course, is that we need to protect our daughters from the images that may harm their self-esteem or make them uncomfortable about their bodies. A great message, no doubt.
However, corporate activism usually has limits and contradictions (as do most things in life, really). Miguel sent us this ad spoof that points out that many of the images the Dove ad says we should be protecting our daughters from are actually used in Axe ads–and Axe is owned by Unilever, the same company that owns Dove.
So Unilever manages to target both markets–those who respond to sexualized images and those who find them harmful–through different brands. This is a common tactic–because large multinational companies own so many different brands, they can market to many different groups of consumers; when we reject one product because of its production process or advertising and buy another instead, there’s a very good chance we’re buying from the same corporate entity, just a different brand name.
As one blogger nicely put it:
It’s a parent’s responsibility to make sure the damaging messages they themselves produce don’t reach your kids.
That is, Dove is telling parents to protect their kids, as if Dove CARES, but Dove’s parent company is producing those very same messages. (It’s kind of like a single corporation owning a beer company and running Alcoholics Anonymous. How very convenient for both.)
A commenter pointed out that Greenpeace made an ad based on Dove’s “Onslaught” commercial that brings up the effects of palm oil production in the destruction of forests in Indonesia:
Thanks, Dangger!
NEW: There is a terrific post at Moment of Choice about one woman’s experience auditioning for a Dove Real Woman commercial. From the post:
Under the guise of looking for women who felt truly comfortable in their own skin, no matter what they looked like, they asked us to bare all or most of it, to prove just how comfortable we really were…A young peppy assistant demonstrated how they wanted us to shake our hands in the air like we just didn’t care and do a full 360 for the camera and male judging panel.
It’s a fascinating inside look at a process most of us never take part in, and reinforces the fact that corporate activism often covers an awful lot of business-as-usual behind the scenes.
Comments 38
Anonymous — May 24, 2008
Perhaps Unilever has an age cut-off -- ten-year-olds should be sheltered from their ads, while 18-year-olds should be in them? Just like movie ratings!
I've often been impressed with the Dove "Campaign for Real Beauty" ads. It's an admirable idea, but they tend to pay lip service to "real" beauty in so many ways. Sure, they'll use models of healthy weight, but the cellulite and other imperfections are airbrushed away. Plus, the faces and body shapes of those women are all along the lines of the beauty ideal, just a little wider. This is the first time I've seen this ad. So many implications, even without the Unilever tie-in! For one thing, this ad (and, I'd argue, all of the Dove product line) is targeted toward women in their 30s and 40s, which is now being expanded to mothers with girls of their own. For another, it's yet another play on the idea that parents should shelter their children from the evils of the world...which, if you look at the ad, come from everywhere, even bus stops. How is this supposed to be possible?
At least they company is admitting that advertising can be problematic, even if it's completely hypocritical in terms of their other advertising efforts. (In this case, those aimed at men in their teens and 20s.)
alex — May 25, 2008
should not all be sheltered from the message from these ads? or is it just the same as with tv and music , just little defenseless girls are the victims,
I have not read any evidence that young girls are more easily bullied by advertising than their male counterparts.
Junior Sociologist — May 25, 2008
Unilever also owns Fair & Lovely. Both products target cultural ideals - like, light skin or loving your self for who you are.
Dangger — May 25, 2008
I saw the Green peace/Dove Onslaught(er) video on youtube, perhaps you should check it out, its very well done http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odI7pQFyjso
Village Idiot — May 26, 2008
Corporate 'activism' seems to be analogous to manufacturing weapons. Like ads, rifles can be used by both the 'good' guys and the 'bad' guys. Thanks to corporate acquisitions, consolidations, and mergers running rampant in an environment of little to no oversight or regulation (aka 'free trade'), very few companies end up owning most of the world's industrial production capacity, and they want us to consume what they produce so they can produce more. That's pretty much all there is to it; no 'secret societies' or Reptiloid Space Bankers are running this show. It's much more banal and pathetic than that.
A company selling both Axe Ego Spray and Dove Enlightenment Soap is not being contradictory or hypocritical because the only purpose of the existence of that (or any) corporation is Growth and Profit, period.
Feeding or even creating a conflict is in their financial interests because they manufacture the paraphernalia for both sides of it. Corporate Charters require constant growth or the Board will be ousted by shareholders, so all other concerns take a back seat (at best). Another word for 'unregulated growth' we hear a lot these days is cancer.
When one subsidiary of a parent company makes rifles, another makes ammunition, a third makes bullet proof vests, a fourth makes gauze and sutures, and a fifth produces nationalistic bumper stickers, we can expect the parent company's profits to soar during war as those items are consumed and we can understand their interest in promoting war. We can also understand why businesses created the idea of subsidiaries and holding companies; "we" didn't sell your enemies those weapons or those dangerous products to your kids, that other company (which happens to possess very little in terms of seizable assets) did! For a particularly ironic example, consider that some Chinese factories are producing "Free Tibet" flags and stickers to sell abroad.
Encouraging war, divisiveness, and conflict in general is in a corporation's best interests, so long as we take a myopic view of the concept of 'interests.' It's no different with cultural issues. A company may not be directly inciting something it's pretending to be concerned about (unless it's profitable), but it certainly won't do anything substantive to address it (unless it's profitable) beyond paying some lip service to the problem, and in this case Unilever actually does add to it with their Axe ads (because it's profitable).
The name "Unilever" appearing as conspicuously as the words AXE and DOVE in their respective ads might make people say "Hey wait a minute..." and we can't have that kind of scrutiny or profits are at risk and shareholders start whining.
The contradictory marketing of Dove vs. Axe is a low-intensity manifestation of a mindset that is corrosive to culture itself, and resembles a kind of parasitic fractal that works the same way across the full spectrum of society, from two individuals up to to nations and ultimately all the way up to multinational corporations. It may even help accelerate civilization's ultimate unraveling, as seems to be the trend. It'll be Us vs. Them right up until there's None; peace at last!
It's all connected.
Sociological Images » WHAT WE’VE BEEN UP TO BEHIND YOUR BACK (JUNE 2008) — July 2, 2008
[...] added a Greenpeace video targeting Unilever to this post about Dove and Axe ads. The video shows how the American beauty industry that is hurting American [...]
Sociological Images » DATING SITE FOR BEAUTIFUL PEOPLE ONLY — September 16, 2008
[...] tagline, “Campaign for real beauty,” and the pose are taken from Dove’s “Real Beauty” marketing campaign. Applicants submit a profile and then members vote on whether they are attractive enough to [...]
Cecil — October 5, 2008
I find it interesting how men have not fought back against the generalization that they are all beefy hormonal womanizers.
LG — May 15, 2009
I believe Dove's parent company also sells skin-whitening products in India. The commercials depict women getting jobs or men once they change they use the product. So much for 'loving the skin you're in.'
Ramblin' Rabbit — May 15, 2009
Also, by using their Axe footage in the Dove ad they are using one ad to sell to both target audiences.
Richard poynton — May 15, 2009
It's interesting to note also that the "feminist" ad is targeted at women, and that Axe (Lynx here in the UK) advertising is targeted at men
Sara A. — May 15, 2009
We talk about this kind of thing in my marketing classes. In a corporation the size of Unilever, Dove and Axe might as well be their own companies. They each have their own target audiences they each have their own budgeting departments and marketing departments. From a functional standpoint Unilever doesn't care what they do so long as they are towing the bottomline and making a profit and growing consistently. Dove's message is not invalidated by Axe's misogyny any more than it is invalidated by those Bud Light commercials. Don't punish Dove for being under the Unilever umbrella any more than you'd praise Axe for it. If anything we should be praising Dove's marketing director for making such a radical perspective mainstream.
Jared — July 22, 2009
Cecil, don't worry, there are some men out there who fight back against that. I suspect that the reason more don't is because, frankly, that stereotype gives men an awful lot of power.
Anonymous — August 25, 2009
Plus, in my experience at least, men tend to get absolutely CRUSHED when they try to bring up any form of inequality that disfavors men, because obviously the only reason we would do that is to steal legitimacy from the feminist movement. They couldn't possibly both be problems at the same time, since women are kept down specifically by men, and not by society as a whole.
It's simply not worth bringing up. We just have to stoically deal with our (admittedly not quite as bad) problems, and take it like men.
Rambling Wrek — August 25, 2009
Here are some Fair & Lovely and Fair & Handsome (yes, men too) adverts in India:
girl gets the job http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-9tcXpW1DE
guy gets the girl http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eWN6DW4WGWU&feature=related
And of course, the Real Beauty campaign is everywhere on TV and print media.
I strongly believe that if it were not for the fairness cream advertisements, the country would not be as obsessed, going far enough to specifically mention "wanted fair, beautiful bride of 20-25 yrs..." in newspapers. Unilever created a need and a market for a gullible consumer, by turning around hir skin colour into hir insecurity, selling the creams, and finally sparking racism in marriage proposals and baby skin colours.
Yes, they are looking for a real woman who uses Fair & Lovely.
BEN AND JERRY’S: PROGRESSIVE AT ONE LEVEL, PURE CAPITALIST AT ANOTHER » Sociological Images — November 27, 2009
[...] Dove, (misogynistic) Axe, and (racist) Fair and Lovely products (examples here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and [...]
A — December 12, 2009
I would in no way defend all the destruction that is done to the earth, but attacking one company that uses Palm Oil, out of hundreds that do, seems a little misguided. How about attacking the industry?
“Big Mama, You’re Beautiful” » Sociological Images — February 20, 2010
[...] some reason, this vintage ad seems so much more genuine than any of its modern [...]
An Example of Compulsory Femininity » Sociological Images — March 12, 2010
[...] is the same Dove, of course, that markets itself with the “real beauty” campaign and is owned by the same company as Axe. var addthis_language = 'en'; 2 Comments Tags: bodies, gender, gender: beauty, gender: [...]
Corporate Contradictions: Making Sense of Dove’s new “Men+Care” campaign « Yeah, That Needs to Go — March 13, 2010
[...] my googling of Dove , I cam across this great post (read it! watch the videos!) that put this whole conversation into perspective for me. Unilever [...]
Sunday Pleasures #72 « Shanna Germain — September 5, 2010
[...] Smart Company. Smart Ads. Sneaky Ads? Dove Hits All Markets. [...]
Boobs with Blogs | nonsequiteuse — December 11, 2010
[...] to help you, are several blog posts that deconstruct and tear apart that campaign for real beauty to buy Dove soap (and point out that the same company sells Axe body [...]
Beauty Is the Pits | Beauty Is Inside — April 19, 2011
[...] mens products whose ads feature the same sexist imagery that Dove® is allegedly fighting against. This site shows one of the videos put out by the Dove® campaign, along with a brilliantly re-edited video [...]
SCANNING TEH POLITIX IN/OF GLITCH PANEL 2011 – Presentation Slides + Notes | Marta Blicharz | Blog — November 10, 2011
[...] http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/05/24/onslaught-dove-vs-axe/ [...]
Dove’s Latest Attempt to Combat Body Shaming Is a Huge Fail (VIDEO) | Twirlit — March 7, 2013
[...] and its somewhat ironic, long-running Real Beauty campaign. (The irony comes from the fact that Dove is owned by Unilever, which also owns Axe (known as Lynx in the UK) – a company not exactly known for its respectful [...]
Political Science 103 International Politics Dr. Webb Blog Post | elisevon — March 18, 2013
[...] http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/05/24/onslaught-dove-vs-axe/ [...]
Why The New Dove Real Beauty Campaign Video Is Less Than Perfect | fbomb — April 24, 2013
[...] make their ultimate intentions any purer. Dove is a company (owned by none other than Unilever, the same company that owns Axe, a product which has produced horrendously sexist ads) that realizes women hold 86% of consumer [...]
Here it comes: Do your research for yourself rather than allowing the beauty industry to give you false results | Vanity Rush — February 8, 2014
[…] I found out it was owned by Unilever, which also owns Axe and Slimfast. http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/05/24/onslaught-dove-vs-axe/ […]
No, the Dove "Love Your Curls" Ad Is Not a Feminist Victory | WomenSportWatches — January 31, 2015
[…] summary of womanlike empowerment severely when a beauty code is owned by Unilever, a same company that owns a ultimate bro toiletry of choice, Axe. The same association ironically motionless that […]
Unilever Produces Conflicting Images and Messages in the Media | The Ethical Truth — March 29, 2016
[…] women are represented in the media; they are pressured and criticized and still not perfect. The purpose of the ad was to send the message that harmful images in the media make young girls unhappy and […]