Headlines across the country recently noted that more Americans now consider themselves “pro-life” than ”pro-choice”. In the last month many polls have focused on Americans’ views on abortion, yet the Gallup poll released on May 15, 2009, got the most attention. President Obama was just about to give the commencement address at Notre Dame where a controversy had erupted; critics complained that a pro-choice politician should not have been granted an honorary degree at a Catholic institution.
The Gallup poll graphs below show the new divergence of opinion. Looking at the pattern over time, it is clear that opinions of pro-choice versus pro-life have been changing, although the trend between 1998 and 2008 is not remarkable in its variety. The change that the news signaled is that last switch in the apparent prevalence of pro-life opinions.
Sociologically, let’s look at this issue more closely. Opinions on abortion, its availability, one’s identification with the issue, and its legality are sensitive and controversial because they involve religious, political, and cultural values and very personal, often difficult situations.
Polls show a variety of support depending on the wording of the questions. Look at the poll results from the last month:
Gallup Poll (May 7-10, 2009. N=1,015 adults nationwide. Margin of Error ± 3).
“Do you think abortions should be legal under any circumstances, legal only under certain circumstances, or illegal in all circumstances?”
Legal Under any Circumstance Legal only under Certain Circumstances Illegal in all Circumstances Unsure 22% 53% 23% 2% Quinnipiac University Poll (April 21-27, 2009. N=2,041 registered voters nationwide. Margin of Error ± 2.2).
“Do you think abortion should be legal in all cases, legal in most cases, illegal in most cases or illegal in all cases?”
Always Legal Usually Legal Usually Illegal Always Illegal Unsure 15% 37% 27% 14% 7%
The wording of the questions are only slightly different (circumstances versus cases) yet the results are quite different. Note that a only a minority hold that abortions should always be illegal. “Identity” issues also frame the debate. As the following polls show, when asked whether they consider themselves pro-life or pro-choice, respondents offered slightly different results.
Here’s something sociologists need to consider: We don’t know whether these differences are statistically significant. This rather important issue is not addressed in news reports on the Gallup Poll. It may be that we have equal percents of people in each category and the oscillations over time are not statistically significant. At the very least, the reported margin of error (MoE) shows that the percent of people in these groups may not be so different after all.
FOX News/Opinion Dynamics Poll (May 12-13, 2009. N=900 registered voters nationwide. MoE ± 3).
“On the issue of abortion, would you say you are more pro-life or more pro-choice?”
Pro-life | Pro-Choice | Both/Mix | Unsure |
49% | 43% | 6% | 2% |
Gallup Poll (May 7-10, 2009. N=1,015 adults nationwide. MoE ± 3).
“With respect to the abortion issue, would you consider yourself to be pro-choice or pro-life?”
Pro-choice | Pro-life | Mixed/Neither | Don’t Know What Terms Mean | Unsure |
42% | 51% | 2% | 4% | 1% |
CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll (April 23-26, 2009. N=2,019 adults nationwide. MoE ± 2).
“With respect to the abortion issue, would you consider yourself to be pro-choice or pro-life?”
Pro-choice | Pro-life | Unsure about Terms | Mixed/Both/Neither | Unsure |
49% | 45% | 1% | 3% | 1% |
Another way to look at abortion opinions is to ask about people’s legal opinions as this poll does. The CNN poll below asked specifically about the Roe v. Wade decision. Even if more people might identify themselves as pro-life, there is still a preponderance of support for the Supreme Court decision.
CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll (May 14-17, 2009. N=1,010 adults nationwide. MoE ± 3).
“The 1973 Roe versus Wade decision established a woman’s constitutional right to an abortion, at least in the first three months of pregnancy. Would you like to see the Supreme Court completely overturn its Roe versus Wade decision, or not?”
Yes, Overturn | No, Not Overturn | Unsure |
30% | 68% | 1% |
Here’s another piece of data to consider – the actual trends in abortions. Since the 1980s, the rates have leveled off thus abortion has not increased in use. The fact that it is has been decreasing and not increasing might lessen opinions about its availability.
To better understand how the pro-life and pro-choice opinions may be changing; take a look at these graphs from the Gallup poll and notice which lines are moving in which direction.
It seems pretty clear that more conservative, moderate, and Republican people are leaning more pro-life than they were in years past. How might we explain this? Republican leaders have stressed this issue in their attempt to solidify opposition to the Obama administration and the gains made by Democrats in the House and Senate.
From a sociological perspective, we can see that this issue is much more complex than a single headline. Before we can conclude that social change is happening, we need to examine the data available and whether our findings are statistically significant. What other methodological questions do you think we need to ask to better understand trends in public opinion?
————————–
Sally Raskoff is a blogger at the Everyday Sociology Blog and is an Associate Professor of Sociology at Los Angeles Valley College. One of her main goals in life is to demystify society through the use of sociology.
If you would like to write a post for Sociological Images, please see our Guidelines for Guest Bloggers.
Comments 16
Liz — July 10, 2009
I believe you meant to say "pro-choice" in the paragraph about Obama speaking at Notre Dame. Currently stated as:
"critics complained that a pro-life politician should not have been granted an honorary degree at a Catholic institution."
Also, are percentages missing under the poll “Do you think abortion should be legal in all cases, legal in most cases, illegal in most cases or illegal in all cases?” ?
Joshua — July 10, 2009
I realize this blog isn't about the abortion issue specifically, but the terms "pro choice / pro life" are so distasteful to me. It's a classic example of allowing the opposition to frame the issue by choosing the terminology. Choice is not the opposite of life. Choice vs. Life are not the two sides of this issue. It's either choice vs. the lack thereof or life vs. death, depending on how you look at it.
Joshua — July 10, 2009
... continuing my previous post: why don't people just call it what it is and just say, "Pro abortion rights" vs. "anti abortion rights"?
RMJ — July 10, 2009
Joshua, I'm with you.
I really enjoyed seeing such a rigorously cited and quantitatively analyzed piece in my Google Reader. It's a nice break!
Lisa Wade, PhD — July 10, 2009
Hi Liz,
Thanks for the heads up. I fixed the stats and sent a note to Sally about the possible typo.
Grizzly — July 10, 2009
"Anti abortion rights" has a negative connotation that I expect pro-life advocates wouldn't appreciate. The description would paint them as opposed to individual rights. I expect the term "Pro fetus rights" would be more acceptable.
SarahMC — July 10, 2009
The pro-life/pro-choice numbers are meaningless because the anti-abortion movement has been pretty successful in their war on language. People think "pro-life" is kind and good whilst "pro-choice" is forcing pregnant women to kill babies. I've spoken to so many people who support legal abortion but call themselves "pro-life" because they don't think *they* could get an abortion, or they oppose third-trimester abortions performed on a whim (which doesn't even legally happen).
Grizzly — July 10, 2009
I guess it depends on which people you are talking about. I live in the U.S. Northeast, where, in my experience at least, pro-life is synonymous with right wing religious nut jobs.
david in iowa — July 11, 2009
Polls are very interesting but in the end when the decision is made, polls no longer matter.
Ellen Goodman in an article several years ago wrote these amazing words,
"There will always be 3 execptions for an abortion, rape, incest........and me".
The personal trumps the political
Bork — July 11, 2009
Interesting data!
If I were to add one variable as a covariate, I would consider adding a question asking for an estimate of the prevalence of late-term abortions.
In objective terms, late term abortions are uncommon, accounting for perhaps 2% of total abortions. But the pro-life movement has been successful in framing the debate around these procedures, which (as @sarahMC notes) has moved moderates to the pro-life camp.
I'll bet that you could explain a lot of the shifts in self-description (pro life vs pro choice) if you could capture people's lay beliefs about how often late-term abortion happens.
In other words, the shift is happening not because of a fundamental shift in people's core moral beliefs -- but because they construe abortion as frequently involving viable fetuses. (i.e., what people think abortion refers to is qualitatively different in 1996 and 2009).
Chris — July 11, 2009
Late term (third trimester) abortions are extraordinarily rare, far under 2%. Remember that until recently they were only performed by THREE doctors in the entire country, and those doctors would always apply their own professional judgement whether an abortion was warranted at that point. They could always say 'no' if they were uncomfortable with the situation.
Chris — July 11, 2009
The analysis seems to miss a rather important variable -- many moderate Republicans have changed their self-identification to independent or Democrat. You aren't comparing the same populations in, e.g., 2005 vs. 2009.
This has two effects: it makes the Republicans appear to be more pro-life (since the moderates tended to be more balanced) AND it makes independents and Democrats appear to be more pro-life as well (since the newly self-identified members of these groups tended to be more pro-life than the prior members). This is a very counter-intuitive result that most people overlook and gives you an illusion of change if you only look at the subsets without considering movement between them.
bork — July 15, 2009
Chris, you miss my point. I agree with you that late term abortions are a rarity.
What I'm saying is that I bet that the objective rate of incidence is massively overestimated by those who have swung their identification from pro-choice to pro-life. If you were moderately pro-choice, but then come to believe that late-term abortions are common (as the right wing has been successful in convincing people), you are more likely to change your identification to pro-life.
So basically, my hypothesis is that for those who changed identification, they were thinking of zygotes in 1996, but thinking of viable fetuses in 2009. It's an empirical question.
But to clarify, I'm not trying to suggest that they are common, liberally administered, or anything else I think Chris is accusing me of thinking :)
SouthWind83 — October 22, 2009
If you are rude to me or anyone in my circle, ditto. ,
Arnold65 — October 23, 2009
OH my gosh, great questions! ,
medical abortion — January 26, 2010
Does anyone know if anyone has done silmar research in the UK comparing the three main policital parties and the views on abortion. It is not such a hot topic in the UK but there are interest groups on both side.