Many important things will be said in the next few weeks about the murder of nine people holding a prayer meeting at a predominantly African American church yesterday. Assuming that Dylann Roof is the murderer and that he made the proclamation being quoted in the media, I want to say: “I am a white woman. No more murder in my name.”
Before gunning down a room full of black worshippers, Roof reportedly said:
I have to do it. You rape our women and you’re taking over our country. And you have to go.
For my two cents, I want to suggest that Roof’s alleged act was motivated by racism, first and foremost, but also sexism. In particular, a phenomenon called benevolent sexism.
Sociologists use the term to describe the attribution of positive traits to women that, nonetheless, justify their subordination to men. For example, women may be described as good with people, but this is believed to make them perform poorly in competitive arenas like work, sports, or politics. Better that they leave that to the men. Women are wonderful with children, they say, but this is used to suggest that they should take primary responsibility for unpaid, undervalued domestic work. Better that they let men support them.
And, the one that Roof used to rationalize his racist act was: Women are beautiful, but their grace makes them fragile. Better that they stand back and let men defend them. This argument is hundreds of years old, of course. It’s most clearly articulated in the history of lynching in which black men were routinely violently murdered by white mobs using the excuse that they raped a white woman.
I stand with Jessie Daniel Ames and her “revolt against chivalry” in the 1920s and ’30s. Ames was one of the first white women to speak out against lynching, arguing that its rationale was sexist as well as racist. Roof is the modern equivalent of this white mob. He believes that he and other white men own me and women like me — “you rape our women,” he said possessively — and so he justified gunning down innocent black people on my behalf. You are vulnerable, he’s whispering to me, let me protect you.
All oppression is interconnected. The matrix of domination must come down. I am a white woman. No more murder in my name.
This essay was expanded for The Conversation and cross-posted at the Washington Post.
Lisa Wade, PhD is an Associate Professor at Tulane University. She is the author of American Hookup, a book about college sexual culture; a textbook about gender; and a forthcoming introductory text: Terrible Magnificent Sociology. You can follow her on Twitter and Instagram.
Comments 24
cardinalis — June 18, 2015
Thank you for this.
Daily Feminist Cheat Sheet — June 18, 2015
[…] “I am a white woman. No more murder in my name.” […]
Mad Crocheter — June 18, 2015
Yes! When we covered lynchings in African American History, after I processed the horror of the act itself, it struck me how stressful it must have been on white women at the time. Brushing up against a black man might get him killed. Making eye contact with a black man might get him killed. Speaking to a black man could get him killed.
I can understand why many women probably bought in to the ideology of the day. It was easier than coping with that kind of pressure.
Anon — June 18, 2015
Well, let's not forget more women were killed in this massacre than men, so he was more worried about just killing Black people period. Let's not forget all of the Black women that are being killed for white women as well. Far too often the violence Black women face is forgotten in favor of Black men and it needs to stop.
Joanna — June 18, 2015
I notice the author omitted the history of white men raping black women. If murderous white men are acting out of "benevolent chivalry", as the author asserts, then why has this chivalry not been extended toward black women? How can she talk about universal ideas of womanhood and masculinity and ignore the racial constructs? Also 7 of the 9 people killed in this massacre were women. How does that fit into this analysis?
Bill R — June 18, 2015
Unfortunately what we have here is someone not worth philosophizing about. Mr Roof appears by early reports to be "troubled", with some minor run-ins with the law, unemployed by choice, and a recent history of alienating friends with racist talk; your basic young American ass with a gun.
So nothing's going to prevent this from happening in the future. Conservatives will run from the story because of the gun thing. Liberals will get lost in thought between the racist element and feeling sorry for the misunderstood Roof. Obama will say something presidential and the next thread here will lament income inequality in some new way.
And the angle about benevolent sexism, after Roof killed multiple women in his big cry for help, isn't going to get any more airtime than it's gotten here today.
Next...
jovent — June 19, 2015
Listen, white-on-black crime is a statistical rarity. According to data from the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS), an estimated 320,082 whites were victims of black violence in 2013, while 62,593 blacks were victims of white violence. That same year, according to the Census Bureau, the white and black populations in the U.S. were 201,817,552
and 37,685,848, respectively. Whites therefore committed acts of
interracial violence at a rate of 32 per 100,000, while the black rate
was 849 per 100,000. In other words, the “average” black was
statistically 26.5 times more likely to commit criminal violence against
a white, than vice versa. Moreover, blacks who committed violent crimes
chose white victims 47.7% of the time, whereas whites who committed
violent crimes targeted black victims only 3.9% of the time.
For many years and for a wide variety of crimes, this pattern has been
among the most consistent findings of criminal-justice research.
Nationwide in 2013, there were approximately 67,755 black-on-white aggravated asaults,
as compared to just 1,748 white-on-black crimes of the same
description. Thus, blacks committed acts of interracial aggravated
assault at a rate of 181 per 100,000—fully 201 times higher than the
white rate of 0.9 per 100,000. Moreover, blacks guilty of aggravated
assault chose white victims 44.1% of the time, while whites who
committed aggravated assault selected black victims only six-tenths of
1% of the time.
Also in 2013, there were approximately
13,463 black-on-white rapes and 38,744 black-on-white robberies. Blacks
guilty of rape chose white victims 50.2% of the time, and blacks who
committed robbery chose white victims 48% of the time. By contrast, the
number of white-on-black rapes and robberies reported in the NCVS
surveys were so infinitesimal, that in each case whites were estimated
to have accounted for 0.0% of all rapes and robberies committed against
black victims in the United States.
General News 9 dead in shooting at South Carolina church - Page 2 - Empty Closets - A safe online community for gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender people coming out — June 19, 2015
[…] 9 dead in shooting at South Carolina church I value this woman's perspective on the tradegy. […]
Renna Shesso — June 20, 2015
"...white mobs using the excuse that they raped a white woman." Raped, or whistled at, or looked at, or commented on, or failed to step aside for...
boriskist — June 21, 2015
jovent is a white supremacist racist troll. see it's other comments via discuss. i wouldn't bother engaging.
"Of all the millions of creatures who have inhabited the face of this planet over the eons of time, none has ever quite equaled
that of the White Race. Nature endowed her Elite with a greater
abundance of intelligence and creativity, of energy and productivity
than she endowed unto any other creature, now or in the millenniums
past. "
Weekend reading | Of Means and Ends — June 27, 2015
[…] Lisa Wade: “I am a white woman. No more murder in my name.” […]
Amy Schumer responds to criticism by insisting she’s not racist, just funny - The Washington Post — June 29, 2015
[…] line of thought isn’t just damaging to men of color. This sort of benevolent sexism hurts white women, too because it suggests that they’re helpless and delicate and in need of […]
Sticky Benevolent Sexism | Songs for the Struggling Artist — March 28, 2017
[…] Benevolent sexism is super confusing for a lot of dudes. It’s why the Orange Man in Chief thinks he’s great for women. Women are also confused by it. It’s men being nice, right? But so many studies show us how not nice it can be. It can be very dark and very dangerous. […]