In case you were wondering, race is still important in the U.S., including in American sports. Deadspin put out a neat tool just in time for NFL draft weekend, allowing readers to see for themselves just how often different words are used to describe white and black athletes in draft scouting reports. It turns out, for example, that a black prospect’s report is more likely to mention his “motor,” while the typical white player is more likely to be called a “worker.” “Freakish” shows up five times in black reports, and never in a white player’s. Black players are also more likely to be called “coachable.”
I downloaded the data to find out just what the “blackest” and “whitest’ words were. I then drew out the 50 words most likely associated with black and white athletes, respectively. The words are all vaguely football-ish, but upon reflection distinctive patterns emerge.
Some words leap out immediately. Reports on black athletes are far more likely to include the word “mother.” Conversely, white athletes’ reports mention “brothers” more often. Black players’ reports more often include “driving”; reports on white athletes mention “drive.”
Dig a bit deeper, and some groupings appear. I created five rough categories for the most common “black” words, and another four for the most common white words:
Table 1: black word groups | |
Physicality | upright, leaping, acceleration, pedal, driving, talented, runs, bounce, accelerates, chase, closes, tightness, track, radius, flexible, coordination, physicality |
Violence | jam, violent, disruptive |
Positional | all-purpose, cutback, touches, safety, open-field, pass-rush, cornerback, return, returner, cuts, gaps, gap, wr |
Development | loose, currently, support, stop, drop, interception, terms, directions |
Other | jones, auburn, vj, instead, wrap, disengage |
Table 2: white word groups | |
Quarterback | delivery, accuracy, velocity, accurate, mobility, short-to-intermediate, throwing, placement, pocket, passer, release, throw, passing, arm, throws |
Other positional | leg, center, pressure, targets, touch, guard, under, offense, rushers, blocking, keeps, tackle |
Intelligence | intangibles, understands, intelligence, all-conference, smart, experienced, sound, leader |
Other | onto, brother, backup, drive, 50, ends, base, ten, four-year, keeping, punch, left, timing |
I was quite surprised just how pervasive the old tropes of the smart white leader athletes, and the talent and physical black athletes remain. The word “accuracy” is more than twelve times more likely to be associated with a white player than his black counterpart. Likewise, the words “understands,”(3.9 times) “intelligence” (3.0 times), and the sneaky “intangibles” (3.9 times) are all far more likely to be associated with white athletes.
Conversely, reports on black athletes are more likely to include “leaping” (6.3 times), “upright” (10.4 times), and “violent” (5.1 times). They comparatively rarely include words associated with quarterbacking, intelligence, or leadership.
What the numbers can’t tell us is how much of the difference can be ascribed to the scouts themselves allowing biases to creep in, and how much reflects ways in which athletes have been shaped to this point (i.e., coached to be violent, encouraged to become leaders, etc). This is obviously an important question, but either way it is clear that race remains a hugely important filter affecting life chances, even in something as supposedly meritocratic as professional and near-professional sports.
A longer version of this post, with more details on methods, can be found at Politics All the Way Down. Photo credit: Ron Almog, via wikimedia commons.
Stewart Prest is a PhD candidate in political science at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada. You can follow him at his blog, Politics All the Way Down, and on Twitter. Cross-posted at Pacific Standard.
Comments 5
RCCola — May 15, 2014
This is fascinating.
A few of the words have to do with differences in frequency of races at a particular position ("upright" is a word used to describe a running back's style, and it's exceedingly rare to find a white running back in the NFL), which is a separate if related issue. Same goes for the quarterbacking words - accuracy is not a word that's going to be used for, say, a linebacker.
But overall it's interesting, if not shocking, to see that in the sports world, white still equals intelligent, and black still equals athletic.
I suspect it has more to do with bias creeping in than with how players are developed, mostly because, in my opinion, "cerebral" black players and "athletic" white players are often missed when people list "smart" vs "gifted" athletes... This is true in basketball, too.
Yrro Simyarin — May 15, 2014
If you're going to look at this kind of analysis... you have to look at their actual combine times and playing styles and see if the race-coded words were *accurate* or not.
Look at the top of the draft -- Clowney, Mack, Robinson, Watkins -- all black dudes with "freakish" physical attributes. As in, they are the only guys out of the hundreds of college football players who are as big and as fast and as strong as they are. Bortles on the other hand is a quarterback with a big arm who runs a 40 literally half a second slower than these guys.
Many of the stereotypes are based on actual expressed physical differences. Many of the white athletes who grade out highly do so because their high football IQ has managed to overcome the difference in physical ability. They're still super fast and strong -- just not compared to the fastest and strongest guys available, who tend to be black.
The racism comes in when you expect people to conform to those averages because of their race. Teddy Bridgewater, for example, is a black quarterback who is an excellent pocket passer and incredibly accurate. Let's test what the draft profile says about him:
http://www.nfl.com/draft/2014/profiles/teddy-bridgewater?id=2543465
"intangibles" "smart" "timing" "patient" "accuracy" "understanding" "respected" "unselfish" "team leader" "short, lateral passes" "not elusive"
This type of analysis is a very useful first step, but unless you look deeper at how well the words describe the person's actual physical attributes, you're not showing whether this is a racist trope of a description of reality.
You can't coach a guy to be 6'5", 266 lbs, and run a 4.5 40 time! That's not "how they were brought up", that's pure differences in genetic potential.
Bill R — May 16, 2014
Wow. Is there really anyone out there who doesn't think race matters in America?
In any event, while these adjectives do seem to separate whites and blacks, the elephant in the corner may not be race per se. The restriction in range in these data is the self-selection bias inherent in the population studied i.e., those who have shown enough success at one level of football play to be considered by professional scouts for the next level. What adjectives would you use to describe that small niche relative to the overall population? Strong? Athletic? Dangerous? Unstable? Self-descructive?
Life gets complicated very quickly. Remembering H.L. Mencken, "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."
Sxy Links: 10 Interesting Reads for Friday, May 16, 2014 (9PM Edition) | SxySrvy — May 16, 2014
[…] in the NFL Draft » Sociological Images by Stewart Prest (533 Words) http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2014/05/15/race-in-the-nfl-draft/ In case you were wondering, race is still important in the U.S., including in American sports. […]
Amy Santee — May 17, 2014
Really interesting post!