Last week NPR reported that scientists now trace some of the rise of American obesity to the fear of fat. Beginning in the 1970s, nutritionists began warning Americans to consume less fat. This initiated the “low fat” and “fat free” crazes that still linger.
Yet, it now seems that people who followed the advice of nutritionists at the time — to eat less cheese, milk, and meat and more pasta, potatoes, and rice — were likely to get fatter, not skinnier. The closer a person stuck to the dietary guidelines, the more weight they would gain and, the more weight they gained, the more others would pressure them to stick to the dietary guidelines. The phrase “cruel irony” only begins to capture it.
The ad below, from 1959, is a peek into another era. Just a few years before the fear of fat began, the sugar industry was plausibly suggesting that eating more sugar was the best way to stay slim. This was industry association propaganda, but no doubt the potato and pasta industries contributed to the story in the ’70s just as the meat and dairy industries are in on it today.
The revision of our nutritional guidelines reminds us to be skeptical of the conventional wisdom. Moreover, it should inspire us all to check our tendency to judge others. We don’t have perfect knowledge that allows us perfect control over our bodies. Scientists are doing the best they can — and hopefully not taking too much funding from for-profit food industries — and individuals are restricted by whatever knowledge and resources they have.
Lisa Wade, PhD is an Associate Professor at Tulane University. She is the author of American Hookup, a book about college sexual culture; a textbook about gender; and a forthcoming introductory text: Terrible Magnificent Sociology. You can follow her on Twitter and Instagram.
Comments 30
Larry Charles Wilson — April 2, 2014
To quote: "Judge not, lest you be judged."
Shepherd — April 2, 2014
This is awesome. After recovering from an eating disorder years ago, I've really learned the value of eating moderately and not buying into dieting fads. Under eating anything just leads to bingeing which can obviously contribute to weight gain. I've found that some sugar is necessary in my healthy diet, especially since I'm very active.
I don't even understand anti-fat, anti-sugar people anymore. Thank god. Such madness.
emily — April 2, 2014
"Healthy food" is such a construct. For some, it's raw vegan and for others it's paleo. Humans can live on "rice with sauce on it" (a peace corps volunteer's description of his West African cuisine) or naught but whale and seal meat.
And what's the size on the goal-weight dress? Sizes sure have grown since 1959.
Cato — April 2, 2014
I don't think it's starchy food that fuels the obesity rise. Rather, it's all the sugar in fat-free food: when the fat is taken out of something, sugar has to be added for bulk and taste. To me, the bread in the US is almost sickeningly sweet; the only sugar-free bread I could find during my 2-year stay in Boston was from artisan bakeries.
The effect of sugar on weight and morbidity is the focus of a lot of research and (as far as I'm aware) quite well established. In contrast, I haven't heard about any such links between starch/complex carbohydrates and morbidity and I fear that you're mixing the two things up, Lisa. However, I'd be very happy to be educated about this if you could send some papers my way. Thanks!
Anna — April 2, 2014
The nutritional guidelines were perfectly reasonable, very much in tune with regional diets around the world that have proven to be good for the heart and overall health.
"Now, to be fair, the kinds of carbs the authors of the guidelines had in mind were whole grains, fruits and vegetables.
But this message was lost in translation. What did Americans hear? Fat is bad; carbs are good.
And the food industry saw the low-fat, high-carb mantra as an opportunity to create a whole new range of products. Fat-free frozen yogurt, fat-free muffins and cookies — the formula was: Take out the fat; add lots of sugar."
In other words, a food industry which shamelessly and greedily capitalized on the public's lack of health literacy was to blame for rising obesity levels. Not poor advice by nutritionists.
Lack of health literacy regarding obesity prevention and management is not something to be judged on an individual level, if "judging" implies some kind of moral condemnation. But it does urgently need to be addressed and amended, in addition to holding the food industry accountable for grossly exploiting it. The way you obscure this issue by misleadingly diverting the root of the problem over to public health nutrition initiatives does not help anyone at all.
Bill R — April 2, 2014
Its amazing to me that we've achieved so much from technology and pharmacology via science in the past 60 years but we can't seem to develop a clear understanding of what foods are healthy and dietetic.
dubusadus — April 2, 2014
Highly recommend the Sawbones podcast for this flavor of debunking. They've covered things like trepenation to the Kellogg diet to weight-loss supplements over time. It's a lot of fun and the husband/wife team have some pretty great goofs.
Julie — April 2, 2014
I was with you 100% until the very last phrase, "individuals are restricted by whatever knowledge and resources they have."
No, they can also use their instincts. They can eat what they crave, when they desire it, in the amount that satisfies. If we could tune out the useless moralizing and nutritional dogma and just eat by instinct and preference, most people would be better off, and spared lots of unhealthy stress. Contrary to what moralizers fear, this would not result in a Doritos-only diet (or whatever the current "villain" food is). Most people would over time come to desire a variety of highly processed, moderately processed (a.k.a. "cooked"), and raw foods.
Food is food, the calorie is the most important nutrient and dieting leads to stress-induced weight gain over time. And when it comes to food and eating and body size, the body itself knows far better than anybody's brain OR anybody's marketing campaign.
Julie — April 2, 2014
I also noted that the ad described "today's active women" doing things like bowling and golf on the weekends, and joining in children's activities. And for these things, it was apparently plausible that someone would need plenty of energy. How sane that sounds compared to today's Fonda-ized ideas about logging time on cardio machines, rushing off to hot yoga classes and the notion that large swaths of the population should be training for half-marathons.
2014-04-04 Fabulous Friday Finds | surviving the food allergy apocalypse — April 4, 2014
[…] as an example of how our thinking on food and diets have changed, check out this ad from 1959 and the accompanying post on whether you’re “eating enough sugar to lose […]
what’s microfilm got to do with nutrition? | Happy is the new healthy — April 4, 2014
[…] post came up this week on Sociological Images (one of my favourite spots to nerd things up!): Is Sugar a Diet Aid? The Answer Depends on the Decade is what I’m talking […]
Magdalena Connelly — July 11, 2020
Being nutrition, you have risen some valuable points about the effectiveness of various diet aid providing ingredients such as sugar. I think that we are on the same page and we should follow moderate healthy plans or keto diet meal plan to have smart look. It is not going to benefit ourselves if we are following a strict diet plan that is stopping us from eating a lot of desired recipes. Following a balanced diet plan is advised by most famous professionals and experts, so interested individuals should only go for it.
Patsy Schofield — July 1, 2021
To my great regret, this is a very urgent problem, which is why I believe that it must be discussed. There is a good article https://schimiggy.com/how-to-prevent-obesity/ about obesity prevention and I can safely say it is very well written. more attention to this in order to eradicate this problem as much as possible. I believe that we will succeed and wish each of you good luck!
Jeorge H Waters — November 7, 2023
Understanding sugar's role in dieting can be complex. Seek insights on https://www.gundrymdbiocomplete3.com/ . While it mainly offers Bio Complete 3, a supplement supporting gut health, it acknowledges the importance of informed decisions. Read more about GundryMD cos it can provide you with diverse perspectives on sugar's impact, helping you make balanced dietary choices. Maintaining gut health with Bio Complete 3 ensures a comprehensive approach to your dieting questions.
ivy michael — August 17, 2024
The role of sugar in diets has shifted significantly over the decades. I find it interesting how perspectives on skilled nursing facility Los Angeles sugar’s impact evolve with new research. While past decades might have seen it as a harmless indulgence, current views emphasize moderation and its potential effects on weight and overall health.