Caoileann A. sent in a great example of the way that women, but not men, are sexualized in our society. In this case it’s a series of American Apparel ads. I know, low hanging fruit. This example is extra great, though.
While normally it’s up to the critic to counterpose the portrayal of men and women in our society, in this case American Apparel does it for us. Here are the categories of attire for men and women exactly the way they appear on the website (i.e., side-by-side) as of Aug. 6th 5:46pm PST:
The categories are exactly the same, but the way men and women are posed is strikingly different. Only “Sweatshirts for Women” shows any commensurability.
This is — all too much — how we look at men and women in our society today. Caitlin Welsh said it nicely:
Lisa Wade, PhD is an Associate Professor at Tulane University. She is the author of American Hookup, a book about college sexual culture; a textbook about gender; and a forthcoming introductory text: Terrible Magnificent Sociology. You can follow her on Twitter and Instagram.Women are presented too often not as consumers of the product, but part of the product – a sexy body sexily getting ready to surf, or a sexy body sexily wearing American Apparel. We’re used to seeing women look sexy and undressed in ads, while men in ads tend to just wear the clothes properly while also looking handsome in the face area.
Comments 77
Someone — August 7, 2013
No doubt that female postures are generally more sexualised than male postures. However, I don't think that the above example is a fair representation of the average difference in representation in contemporary fashion photography.
Moreover, I wonder if that seemingly unsexy posturing isn't also "what women (and men) expect of men". Hence, that *is*, in a way, what's sexy for men.
john — August 7, 2013
In sweatshirts, equality.
ok — August 7, 2013
there's basically no difference in the sweatshirt ads
DB — August 8, 2013
I think the men section is as interesting as the women section. For men, clothes have always been about fitting in with the pack and NOT standing out. The most extreme example would of course be the military uniform, but even office work wear for men is highly uniform-like and seems to allow men to fit in and discourage individualism.
When you look at the men section - 3 of 5 photos are literally about fitting in with the group - identical men wearing identical clothing differentiated only by colour.
Caoileann Appleby — August 8, 2013
Thanks Lisa!
For anyone wondering, I didn't buy anything from American Apparel after this....
Andrew — August 8, 2013
I think what we're seeing here is not the absence of sexualization in the Menswear ads, but rather two dramatically different standards for sexiness.
The ads communicate that feminine sexiness is about exposed skin and dynamic, suggestive action, and that masculine sexiness (of the hipster variety) is a rather static and stoic endeavor. AA seems to have gone to a lot of effort to brand itself with heteronormative tropes (in contrast to the more homoerotic ads for competitors like Abercrombie), and the result looks rather retrograde.
Actually, I quite like their choices with the male models here - they're attractive in a very earthy, natural, and confident way. It would've been a more striking and effective ad if they had presented the female models the same way.
AngryDoc — August 8, 2013
This is one thing I love about REI Coop: The women in their photo shoots are doing stuff that women would want to do in their clothes. They aren't there to look sexy in the outdoors while their boyfriends watch - as they are depicted in Eastern Mountain Sports catalogs.
RespectYourselfFirst — August 8, 2013
When Women (the majority) stop supporting this type of advertising, it will stop...look in the mirror.
Mustachio — August 8, 2013
It's just human nature, or rather, the nature of the human raised in Western 1st World society. Men generally don't care much how they look; while women are all about caring about how they look. Women generally want to look GOOD; men generally are ambivalent. Walk into any clothing store: what's the first thing you see? Clothing for women. You have to really hunt to find the menswear.
Suzanne McEneaney — August 8, 2013
Hard to believe this isn't a spoof.
Simon Cohen — August 8, 2013
While there's no question that sexism in advertising and media is a widespread problem and that men and women are often portrayed very differently, this particular ad from AA isn't one of them. The brand has been in-your-face-over-the-top-ridiculous with their sexualized imagery of women forever. We know it, they know it. More importantly as far as this ad is concerned, their agency knows it. And they're having fun with it. If you think that this is a straight-up make-the-women-sexy-but-keep-it-real-for-the-guys ad, you're not in on the joke. This is clearly a self-aware even dare I say it, subversive piece of creative that pokes fun at AA's whole contrived image. They're saying "we get it, we're ridiculous. In fact look at just how ridiculous we can be!" I mean c'mon - the swim for women is a series of sexy poses each one more over-the-top than the last (who stands like that??) then the swim for men is two shots of the same guy, in the same I-couldn't-be-more-bored-if-they-paid-me-oh-wait-they're-paying-me stance. If this isn't an intentional laugh at their own expense, I don't know what is.
Daisy Duke — August 8, 2013
http://www.businessinsider.com/american-apparels-unisex-ads-2013-5#heres-how-american-apparel-sells-a-unisex-flannel-shirt-to-a-man-1 Illuminating Slide show on AA adverts
Merry — August 9, 2013
Men just don't know how to pose ;)
ViktorNN — August 10, 2013
American Apparel is indeed low hanging fruit. How this company ever got to be considered hip is mind boggling to me.
AA's clothes are obscenely overpriced. They make a big stink about how their clothes are "Made in America" and then they routinely get raided for hiring illegal labor. "Made in America by Foreigners" is more like it. The CEO is a sociopath who has been sued FIVE times for sexual harassment. Their ads - and especially their billboards which are inescapable for those of us driving in LA with small children - are nothing less than toxic visual pollution.
Fionn Murray — August 11, 2013
The ladies' shorts one doesn't strike me as overtly sexualized, as one might indeed carry out athletics training in garb like that. Although I suppose that could also be read as illustrating the higher expectations placed on women to keep in shape compared to men.
New Zealand Online NewsSideswipe: August 13: Drone drops in beer zone » New Zealand Online News — August 12, 2013
[...] Badvertising: How does the American Apparel brand sell clothes to men and to woman? In very different ways… [...]
Skin Deep Snippets, Issue 7 | The Skin Deep Project — August 15, 2013
[...] Source [...]
flatseven mens designer clothi — August 19, 2013
More choices for you here: http://www.flatsevenshop.com/
American Apparel y el machismo publicitario - DIXIT - DIXIT — August 30, 2013
[...] VÍA: The Society Pages [...]
ONE OF THE US’S MOST SEXIST RETAILERS, JUST DOING ITS THING. YOU CARRY ON, AMERICAN APPARELL. — September 3, 2013
[...] Via [...]
What I’ve Been Reading, August ’13 | Catherine Elms — September 8, 2013
[...] love love this. Soc Images blogs about a great example of the way that women, but not men, are sexualized in our society. In this case it’s a series of American Apparel ads. I know, low hanging fruit. This example [...]
Porst — September 9, 2013
Look up "The Hawkeye Initiative". Trust me.
Women and Marketing | Lynley Stace — September 10, 2013
[...] Women Need Clothes; Women Need To Look Cute, some annoying screenshots from a clothing company, side by side and gendered [...]
coatswg — September 12, 2013
The anthropology of this question is interesting. When a woman looks at a man's crotch, as a man, what do I deduce? Does she desire to know what hanging in there? Is she sending signals for pairing up? I see women do this nearly every day.
Some links I nicked from Miri and some of my own | Fullmetal Feminist — September 13, 2013
[...] Men Need Clothes, Women Need to Look Sexy in Clothes from Lisa Wade, PhD, at Sociological Images (content note: sexist imagery); [...]
Travis — September 19, 2013
Straight men won't click on images that show men being sexy.
Women not only WILL click on images of women being sexy, they will click more often on those images than non-sexy images.
The designer of an apparel website is concerned with what the potential customer will click on -- not on imposing any particular cultural idea. The portrayal of women is designed to appeal to women. The portrayal of men is designed to appeal to men (and to women buying clothes for men).
At a major site like American Apparel, the images are tracked and comparison-tested rigorously and constantly. The images of women you see are the ones that got the most clicks from customers. Those images won fair and square, and women did the voting.
Required Reading before Interacting with my Daughter (just kidding) | Marigolds for Mimi — September 22, 2013
[...] http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2013/08/07/men-need-clothes-women-need-to-look-sexy-in-clothes/ [...]
Men Need Clothing. Women Need To Be Sexy. | BroadBlogs — November 6, 2013
[…] yet another example of that “women-are-sexy-men-not-so-much” holler, which I found on Sociological Images, courtesy of American Apparel. The pics are presented just as they were on their website a few […]
Män behöver kläder – kvinnor behöver se sexiga ut | Johanna Arogén — November 26, 2013
[…] ”Kvinnor presenteras för ofta inte som konsumenter utan som en del av produkten. Vi är vana vid att se kvinnor vara halvnakna och sexiga i reklam, medan männen ofta helt enkelt bär kläderna normalt, medan de också ser snygga ut i ansiktet.” […]
What I’ve Been Reading, August ’13 | Catherine Elms — December 29, 2013
[…] love love this. Soc Images blogs about a great example of the way that women, but not men, are sexualized in our society. In this case it’s a series of American Apparel ads. I know, low hanging fruit. This example […]
SarahJane — March 4, 2014
yeah this brand has always been in your face so no big surprise here. Us women simply have to deal with the apparent sexism in advertising. We all just need to retire to our own 401k withdrawal island
Ad Man in Waiting — March 15, 2014
[…] Men Need Clothes: Women Need to Look Sexy […]
ghio — June 7, 2014
this is annoying but i have to admit women's bodies are way sexier i dont wanna see a gross hairy manbulge across billboards women are so much more beautiful than men hence why everyone enjoys looking at them more
Environmental Sociology and Sociological Images | John Girdwood — January 9, 2015
[…] MEN NEED CLOTHES; WOMEN NEED TO LOOK SEXY […]
barrl — March 14, 2015
[…] make gendered versions of a product, that is, one for men and one for women, they tend to assume the male version is functional but the women’s version is sexual. A friend of mine pointed out today that the women’s underwear at Target is listed as […]