Last year Lisa posted about Wonder Woman’s pose on a Justice League cover and the way it revealed performative aspects of gender. DC Comics recently released a new Catwoman series. Majd Al-Shihabi sent in a link to the cover of Catwoman #0. The cover drew a lot of attention for the degree of sexualization of Catwoman, whose unrealistic and painful-looking pose maximizes the prominence of her breasts and butt:
I tried to imagine how you’d have to hold your body to even approximate that pose, but at a certain point it hurt to even think about it.
Gamma Squad posted a number of parodies that highlight the over-the-top sexualization of this female superhero. From Josh Rodgers, of Mushface Comics:
From King of the Siams:
And some time ago Hark! A Vagrant presented Strong Female Characters, which awesomely parodies the “it’s not problematic to sexually objectify all your female characters as long as they’re able to kick ass ‘n stuff!” argument (thanks to Erin R. and Gabrielle M. for sending it in). Here’s just one panel; I recommend following the link to check out the whole thing:
Gamma Squad has several other examples, including one where someone tries to use a graphics design program to reproduce the Catwoman pose without breaking her spine. Results: can’t be done.
Comments 22
lwit — July 30, 2012
This blog is dedicated to the spine-breaking boobs-butt pose: http://eschergirls.tumblr.com/
marge — July 30, 2012
This reminded me of a blog post from a while ago when author Jim C Hines attempted to pose like the women on fantasy novel covers to see just how ridiculous they are:
http://www.jimchines.com/2012/01/striking-a-pose/
Nathan_M — July 30, 2012
That is some pretty craptastic foreshortening/perspective. OR, that is not a human.
Diane Moffatt — July 30, 2012
Fair goes - it is trying to sell to hormone crazed single loner guys.
MJArmstrong — July 31, 2012
Upward-facing-cat yoga position
Alex Odell — July 31, 2012
Apparently, they honestly can't write a complex female character without sexualizing her to a ridiculous degree. Either that, or they figure there's no profit in having strong, capable heroines who doen't do the boobs and butt pose. Now I'm kind of curious - I know nerd male culture can be pretty sexist, the best example being "boobs or gtfo!". Do male nerds really not see the problem, or do they prefer to have objectified pornstars punching people? Would a female superhero become popular if she was realistically muscular and held to the same standard as her male counterparts (i.e., allowed to get beat up, wear clothing that covers everything, rarely drawn in sexy poses)?
Snark — August 1, 2012
No, no, they are completely right. Women and men are drawn absolutely equally in comic books. The men are drawn the way men want to look like and the women are drawn like the men want them to look like. Equality, see?
Eli Larin — August 1, 2012
When I went to the comic store the other day, this cover wasn't the one I saw. But the other cover really isn't much better. Actually I think it's worse.
http://blastr.com/assets_c/2011/09/CatwomanCover092311-thumb-550x844-71630.jpg
Russ — August 5, 2012
Yes- I wonder what type of message this is sending to young women.
[image] Gender, Objectification, and the New Catwoman « slendermeans — August 6, 2012
[...] Via Sociological Images. [...]
Space Glaciers — November 28, 2012
I'm feeling a little hopeless tonight. Marvel is coming out with a book
called Fearless Defenders, starring nine female heroes, but of the two
preview pages they've released, one is almost entirely Misty Knight
breaking her back to show her boobs and butt. I went on CBR to voice my
disappointment and after three pages, not a soul has agreed with me that
this is fucked up. Am I crazy for being especially mad that this is the
direction they're going with this book?
David — October 15, 2013
Context, it's a thing.. http://joyreactor.com/post/1004661?social=1