Cross-posted at Sociology in Focus.
Back in 1987, Raewyn Connell coined the term hegemonic masculinity in a seminal text, Gender & Power. Hegemonic masculinity refers to the dominant form of masculinity that exists within a particular culture. Relative to this ever changing, idealized form of masculinity are different subordinated masculinities – those within a culture that do not live up to the so-called masculine gold standard. Put simply, there are “real men” and then there are all other men.
In watching the 2012 Super Bowl commercials, we can see versions of hegemonic masculinity demonstrated. Perhaps the most vivid version was seen in H&M’s Super Bowl ad, utilizing soccer (futbol) star, David Beckham:
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjd6i0S67HQ[/youtube]
Tattooed, rugged, athletic, showcasing a lean musculature and menacing glare, Beckham embodies a hegemonic masculinity that would surely resonate with sporting audiences. And while not presented in this commercial, it is important to also note that Beckham carries other cultural traits that ad to his hegemonic masculine status – he is globally recognized, financially wealthy, and married to a woman who also holds currency in popular culture. This last point is critical. By being married, Beckham confirms his heterosexuality, and her extraordinary beauty and international popularity raise his standing as a “real man”.
In contrast to Beckham, other males were presented in this year’s Super Bowl commercials, who represent a marginal masculinity, meaning they would love to hold hegemonic masculine status and are pursuing such an identity, but for any number of reasons are unable to achieve it. You could say these are the “wannabe real men”. A good example of marginal masculinity is presented in the following commercial for FIAT:
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxQsLdwCtMU[/youtube]
In contrast to the commercial with Beckham, the male in this commercial lacks qualities that would otherwise provide him with a sense of hegemonic masculinity. Although he appears to be employed (wearing business attire), he is relatively short in comparison to the woman in the ad, cast as nerdy and lacking confidence. Given the fantasy he has with the female actor, we can see he desires hegemonic masculine status. But because he lacks a kind of physical prowess, he is marginalized.
Of even greater importance here, the concept of hegemonic masculinity is not only about men and their relation to one another. Hegemonic masculinity also represents a cultural system that dominates women. Thus, the FIAT commercial is also useful because it illustrates women’s overall subordination. Connell also defined the term “emphasized femininity”, which refers to women’s “compliance with this subordination… oriented to accommodating the interests and desires of men” (p. 183).
When women emphasize their femininity – or are coerced to emphasize their femininity – they are often times objectified. Objectification refers to the depersonalization of someone, such that her/his humanity is stripped and the person(s) is turned into an inanimate object. Sociologists have argued that when humans are objectified, they tend to be “seen as less sensitive to pain,” and, “we care less about their suffering” (Loughnan et al., 2010, p. 716). In other words, when we turn people into object, we remove their humanity, and it is easier to commit violence against them. Feminists commonly argue the objectification of women in the media facilitates women’s ongoing victimization in society at large.
In the FIAT commercial, the woman “emphasizes her femininity” by catering to the male’s sexual desires. She is also objectified – likened to an inanimate car that would lack human feelings and emotion. Go Daddy also aired a commercial clearly objectifying women, where female celebrities paint another female, who is used as an inanimate, sexualized prop to promote the Go Daddy company.
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9ucBY_2WEA[/youtube]
While the Super Bowl is known primarily as a sporting event where millions of Americans tune in each year to watch men engage in athletic competition, the event also includes advertising content that is highly gendered. With so much attention attention directed to this advertising, it is important to dissect it through a gendered framework.
———————————–
David Mayeda is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Sociology and Legal Studies at Hawaii Pacific University. His recent book publications include Celluloid Dreams: How Film Shapes America and Fighting for Acceptance: Mixed Martial Artists and Violence in American Society. He also blogs at The Grumpy Sociologist.
Lisa Wade, PhD is an Associate Professor at Tulane University. She is the author of American Hookup, a book about college sexual culture; a textbook about gender; and a forthcoming introductory text: Terrible Magnificent Sociology. You can follow her on Twitter and Instagram.
Comments 29
Tom Megginson — March 2, 2012
"coined the term hegemonic masculinity in a seminal text"
Sorry, but I giggled.
Yrro Simyarin — March 2, 2012
Love the masculinity analysis.
You missed the most important part of how the FIAT commercial guy fails the hegemonic masculinity test, though - he is not confident, and is intimidated easily. You could cast the same short actor as a hegemonic version of the everyman if he stood up straight and controlled his situation. The height differences emphasizes the effect, no doubt, but the confidence and dominance relationship is everything. The hegemonic man may not need to dominate women - but he *cannot* be dominated by them.
Anna — March 2, 2012
I think the David Beckham commercial is a weak example of hegemonic masculinity, for a number of reasons (of varying importance). To me, it's an unusual take on masculinity in the context of such a mainstream event.
- While tattoos are no longer that deviant in America, I don't think heavily tattooed bodies like Beckham's are yet accepted by the mainstream.
- He is advertising underwear of all things, and he is not engaged in any sort of masculine action, or speaking "manly" words. He is just standing there preening, allowing the camera to graze over parts of his mostly naked body. If this was a woman being featured, it would be much clearer to see that the model is shown as an object, not a subject.
- Furthermore, Beckham has frequently expressed and shown an interest in fashion and beauty-related endeavors; he is not afraid to show he makes an effort with his looks, which if anything, is ridiculed by the hegemonic masculine framework.
- Beckham is a football (soccer for the Americans) player, and the commercial was played during the biggest event for American football. Surely I can't be the only one aware of the popularity in America of jesting soccer for not being the most "masculine" of sports.
- Since Beckham's wife was brought up, I think the author forgot to mention that as a celebrity couple, they have the peculiarity of HIM being the show pony, sex symbol, and "trophy girlfriend" (for which I'm sure there's a better term, I just don't know it) in the public's perception. He was also far less famous, successful career-wise, and wealthy than his now-wife in the first years they were together.
Anonymous — March 2, 2012
If I remember correctly, isn't the Fiat guy a better example of complicit masculinity? That is the best describes as wannabe men, who lack certain traits, but still reap the benefits that comes with having the ones they got. Marginalized masculinity was reserves for those lowest on the ladder, like effeminate gay men who mostly just get punished. Or maybe it's the kind of masculinity that comes close to hegemonic in all but one or two aspects that are allowed to be "forgiven", such as black star athletes... Anyone who knows how it goes?
Boys will be boys — March 2, 2012
One male High School student in Virginia hasn't properly gotten the message about how he is supposed to look and act like a manly-man, but our public school system did not fail to attempt to correct his deviance from the norm by suspending him yesterday... for wearing high heels to school. They didn't say anything about his man-purse, apparently. I wonder if his parents dressed him in those Heelarious©™ high heels for infants when he was a baby?
http://www.nbc12.com/story/17059159/student-clothing-debate?hpt=us_bn5
Then again, he may have been suspended because his heels were beige, which if nothing else has got to be some kind of fashion violation.
Private — March 2, 2012
And yet a lot of people are shocked to hear Beckham's voice, thinking he should sound different, I suppose, based on how he looks.
Andres — March 2, 2012
What I find interesting about the FIAT commercial is that it simultaneously objectifies the woman and personifies the car, making it exciting, sexy, exotic, and a little dangerous like the woman, but all at the cost of diminishing the humanity of the woman and promoting the message that women are objects to be bought and sold.
Erik B. Anderson — March 3, 2012
Have you done any blog posts about the question of violence against men in the Oikos Yogurt Super Bowl commercial?
http://youtu.be/y59VUQxX3Dk
Michelle C. Funk — March 3, 2012
I realize this is beyond the scope of the article (which I think sets a high bar for the accessibility, understandability, and thoughtfulness of SI articles -- thanks!) -- but the Teleflora commercial. Wow. Talk about blatantly showing the (male) audience that they are expected to objectify women and trade money/goods(flowers) for sex.
Michelle C. Funk — March 3, 2012
Interestingly, while I was searching for SB commercial videos after reading this, I found this entry in the '5 worst superbowl commercials' on http://www.superbowl-commercials.org/14401.html.
"5. David Beckham Bodywear – H&M
Has anyone at H&M ever even seen the Super Bowl? Did they really think that burning David Beckham’s tattooed bod into the retinas of millions of men was the best way to introduce their new underwear line? We wanted to list this one twice, but that wouldn’t be fair to the other bad commercials."
So in short, they see Beckham's body as a violent imposition. Nudity and sexualization of the body are for the female -- or, worse, gay! -- domain.
Finally-he-gets-it — March 3, 2012
The best thing about this commercial was that just after it aired, the husband said that he now understood why I feel uncomfortable when objectifying images of women are shown.
FunnyFaceKing — March 4, 2012
if masculinity was indeed hegemonic, you would not have the power to post this blog here, but, amazingly, somehow, it is here
She’s Not Asking For It: Street Harassment and Women in Public Spaces — March 20, 2012
[...] the suffering of their fellow-human-beings? Perhaps, because men don’t see women as human beings. Sociologists have made the argument that the routine objectification of women leads them to be “seen as less [...]
Superbowl Commercials — May 11, 2012
Nice post for more super bowl commercials videos http://www.superbowl-commercials.tv/
Do Women See Sexy Men As Sexy? | BroadBlogs — July 16, 2013
[...] David Beckham can show skin and still look sexy. Maybe it’s because he seems so hyper masculine and hetero that it’s hard to think of him as gay. Sociologist, David Mayeda, has been theorizing on what [...]
Masculinities 101 Week in Review: February 7, 2014 | Masculinities 101 — February 7, 2014
[…] Salon reports that this year’s Super Bowl commercials featured a “sensitive man,” showing flexibility in the boundaries of masculinity. (For analyses of Super Bowl commercials and hegemonic masculinity in years past, see this Sociological Images post). […]