Earlier this month I read an essay that explained to me why I am not married. These reasons included:
- I’m a bitch.
- I’m shallow.
- I’m a slut.
- I’m a liar.
- I’m selfish.
- I don’t think I’m good enough.
Coincidentally, the Pew Research Center released 2010 data showing that just 51% of all American adults were currently married. This is an all time low, down from 72% in 1960.
Comparing this data with the essay above is a nice illustration of the difference between “normative” and “normal.” Normal is what is typical in a statistical sense; it is what actually holds. Normative is what is believed to be good and right in an ideological sense; it is what it is believed does or should hold.
If you go by the essay, written by the thrice married and now single Tracy McMillan, marriage is an ideal state that we all should, or do, desire. In her reality, if you aren’t married, it’s because you’re doing something wrong. Marriage is normative. In actual reality, though, the state of being married is not any more normal than the state of being unmarried.
Only if marriage is normative does the non-normality of marriage become something that needs explaining. McMillan jumps in with hateful stereotypes, but social science has much better explanations.
- Low-income women often do not take-for-granted (as many middle class people do) that they can sustain a marriage through tough times. Accordingly, they wait much longer before marrying once they meet someone they like (as long as 10 years or more), so that they can be as sure as possible about the match. In other words, they take marriage very seriously and are reticent to just jump right in. They know they’re “good enough,” Tracy; in fact, they value themselves and their relationships enough to really put them to the test. (Read Promises I Can Keep for more.)
- Other women get divorced because men don’t do their fair share. Unresolved conflicts over childcare and housework are one of the top reasons that couples dissolve. Women struggle to keep up when they’re working a full time job and doing 2/3rds to 3/4ths of the childcare and housework. They may not see the data, but they may intuit that single mothers do less housework than married ones (it’s true). So they divorce their husbands. They’re not “selfish,” they’re just trying to survive. (Read The Second Shift for more.)
- Other people aren’t married because they’re in love with someone of the same sex. They’re not “sluts,” they’re discriminated against.
And, just for the record:
- I’m not married because I don’t want or need the state’s approval of my relationship and I certainly don’t want it interfering if we decide to part.
- I’m not married because the history of marriage is ugly and anti-woman; because I don’t like the common meanings of the words “wife” and “husband”; and because even today, and even among couples that call themselves feminist, gender inequality in relationships is known to increase when a couple moves from cohabitation to marriage (and I don’t think I’m so special that I’ll be the anomaly).
- I’m not married because I’m opposed to the marriage industrial complex. It’s exploitative, stereotypical, and wasteful.
- I’m not married because I value the fact that my partner and I decide to be together every day, even though we don’t have to jump through legal hoops to do otherwise.
- I’m not married because I don’t want to support a discriminatory institution that has and continues to bless some relationships, but not others, out of bigotry.
- I’m not married because I don’t believe in giving social and economic benefits to some kinds of relationships and not others. I don’t believe that a state- or church-endorsed heterosexual union between two and only two people is superior to other kinds of relationships.
After reading some of the great comments, I’d like to add that I’m not married because of several points of privilege:
- I’m not married because I live in a society that allows women to work, keep their paychecks, rent an apartment, and have a bank account. (And, frankly, I think it’s kind of neat to be in the first generation of American women who can realistically choose not to marry. I like the idea of embracing that.)
- I’m not married because both my partner and I are lucky enough to have a stable, full-time job that offers benefits, so we don’t need to get married so that one of us can get the other health insurance or some other benefit.
- I’m not married because we are both U.S. citizens and don’t have to marry in order to live together.
I could go on, but you get the idea.
The point is that when the normal and the normative don’t align it often leads to social conflict over the meaning of the gap. Some people, like McMillan, may jump in to tongue-lash the deviants. Others may revel in defending non-conformity. In any case, it will be interesting to see how the conversation about marriage continues, especially if, as the trend suggests, married people become a minority in the near future.
Lisa Wade, PhD is an Associate Professor at Tulane University. She is the author of American Hookup, a book about college sexual culture; a textbook about gender; and a forthcoming introductory text: Terrible Magnificent Sociology. You can follow her on Twitter and Instagram.
Comments 114
Anonymous — December 19, 2011
I look around at most of my single female friends and most of them aren't married because they either don't want to be, or because most of the guys in the dating pool aren't just emotionally stunted, they don't even recognize that they are and they don't want to get better. If I were a woman, and straight, I can't see how I'd have anywhere near the patience they do, or that my wife did when we first started dating 10 years ago.
It really isn't (straight) women, it's the highly asymmetric set of social expectations and empowerment that plagues the entire exchange.
Yrro Simyarin — December 19, 2011
But mostly, because in the last 30-40 years marriage became something one does for personal fulfillment rather than for social and fiscal security.
MaryBeth Grove — December 19, 2011
Lisa - You should just retitle this post "Why I'm awesome". Just a friendly hello from a Rutgers undergrad who appreciates your awareness of the true (and not well-hidden, either) history and agenda of marriage as an institution :)
Stephanie — December 19, 2011
Lisa -- I loved this article. Technically I agree with everything you said even though I did get married, again, due to the state not allowing my husband's daughter to visit us if we were only cohabitating... so it was a shotgun marriage. But one line is really true: ... "and because even today, and even among couples that call themselves
feminist, gender inequality in relationships is known to increase when a
couple moves from cohabitation to marriage (and I don’t think I’m so
special that I’ll be the anomaly)." My husband is a wonderful person but for some reason he can't seem to escape his genetics.
Anon — December 19, 2011
Reading McMillan's article, I feel pretty bad for her and her marriage(s). It doesn't sound very happy. All about sacrifice and getting used to being miserable and gender stereotypes.
Sorry about your life, Tracy, but relationships are supposed to be fulfilling.
Anonymous — December 19, 2011
I am ho-hum about this. For the simple reason: poverty e.g. is normal, but isn't in any way something that should be aspired to. So how do these statistics work out race-wise, income-wise and depending on whether your parents' marriage was happy or not? What I'm trying to get at, while that old essay is mostly bullshit, the question whether people WANT to get married but CANNOT for some reason is a valid one. For people who don't want to get married: YAY! But I think the percentage of unmarried people who are unmarried by choice and those who remain unremarried against their will needs to be established first.
Something else on the essay: (a) it was never really established whether it wasn't satire; that is actually the predominant theory, b) its intended audience are not those disadvantaged you mention, but white upper middle class educated women).
Melanie Lopez — December 19, 2011
I love how she manages to throw slut-shaming in there, on top of everything else. Great way to deny someone else's reality (people who enjoy casual, recreational, or non-monogamous sexual relationships).
Aeon Blue — December 19, 2011
Tracy McMillian claims that in order to get married, women are supposed to cook, clean, giggle and wiggle for their husbands and void themselves of any unpleasant emotions that are not conducive to being selfless, devoted wives. And in return, they get love.
This is not in any way fundamentally different from the marriage myth Betty Freidan persuasively argued was driving women mad in the 50s.
AB — December 19, 2011
This is a really wonderful post. I'm especially intrigued by this:
"even among couples that call themselves feminist, gender inequality in relationships is known to increase when a couple moves from cohabitation to marriage"
Could you point me toward the research on this phenomenon?
Yannick — December 19, 2011
Just to play devil's advocate, I think the author of that post is using loaded language for the shock value so that people will pay more attention to her message; I'm not sure the heading of the categories should be taken at face value.
Elena — December 19, 2011
I loved the bit where the author takes a page from abstinence-only textbooks and makes a throwaway reference to oxytocin. But that's because misusing a poorly-understood biological item in order to reinforce outdated and arbitrary social mores because of ~SCIENCE!!~ amuses the heck out of me.
Doctress Ju'ulia — December 19, 2011
Yep, it's been a scam all along... just another way to keep women enslaved.
Anonymous — December 19, 2011
My first thought is a question of what sets married couples apart from other couples. The friends of my parents that I've grown up with have had children, shared houses and apartments for decades, have had children, bickered and cuddled, and I see no difference between those who were married all along, those who haven't married and those who did it while the kids were getting ready to leave the nest, none at all. So why is the marriage itself so important to judgement of morals and family life?
(As a side note for those of you in this situation who are adamant in not marrying: I've seen enough unfair divorces to know that there is nothing protecting your assets in a breakup, but there is a reason why gay people want their unions and why our friends married late in life. Being a homeless widow/er or shut out out of the hospital does not make you any more effective in fighting the heteronormativity in how these benefits are given.)
Christie — December 19, 2011
Great post, Lisa, and I frankly appreciate the strong language, because so few are willing to go there. My one critique though, however, is that there is a relative degree of privilege in being able to eschew marriage. There is the obvious issue that many same-sex couples who want to marry (for whatever reasons) cannot legally do so. Many others who critique the institution of marriage are forced to marry nonetheless to access citizenship, health insurance, custody rights, etc. It's a privileged position to be able to not marry in a society where we give so many social, economic, and political benefits to married people.
Brandon — December 19, 2011
Good post. McMillan's piece was horrifying.
But I take issue with the idea that marriage isn't very much the norm. True, a seemingly low 51% of people are currently married. Add in those who are widowed, divorced, and separated, though, and 71% of the population has been or is currently married. Add in the number of people who are not currently married, but will be some day... and this is still very much the norm.
Most people are not necessarily married right now, but they have been, are, or will be.
guest — December 19, 2011
Someone on my Facebook shared this article, and joke about how spot on it was. He got an earful from me, and I was shocked at the men and women who defended the article and his posting of it afterwards.
ANON — December 19, 2011
get the state out of our relationships; we can manage ourselves; a wonderful summation of anti-welfare movements...enjoy the slippery slope...
Wait, I can hear it now - "love relationships are not the same as making sure we distribute resources in a fair way; we need the state sometimes, just not here"
Mcdubers — December 19, 2011
I love this and everything it says...however, because I can't marry I am still without health insurance. Worse, because I can't marry my son's other mother, and she is unable to adopt due to the laws, he doesn't have health insurance, either. I'd love to rip it all apart, but right now I really just want the quickest way to health insurance for MY family.
Serafina Kalashnikova — December 19, 2011
Lisa, you and I share the exact same views on marriage! Perhaps part of the decline in marriage rates is because more people are also seeing it this way?
Married Fag — December 19, 2011
I'm not going to read Tracy's essay because quite frankly it sounds like it's not worth the time. After reading this essay I feel the same way.. There comes a point we stop bitching about each other and simply live our lives.. Are you gay? Who cares.. Are you married? Who cares.. hetero/gay/trans? Who gives a rip? It's not a matter of whining our way out of discrimination.. we simply have to DO it, live as if it is completely accepted. It's the others who will have to come to terms with it...
slightly worried — December 19, 2011
Reading the
article linked made me feel stumped. Is this meant to be funny? Sarcastic?
Surely nobody can write such nonsense and seriously believe what they are saying?
Please tell me this isn't meant to be a serious piece of advice.
Apart from this, a woman three times married and divorced is just not qualified to give any advice on how to lead a good marriage. And, you know, Tracy, getting a person to marry you is just the beginning and can be achieved relatively easily. Staying happily married, that's where the challenge lies.
Cheryl — December 19, 2011
A wise friend once told me, after growing weary of people asking her why she wasn't married, that she would rather be single than be married and wish she were single. It's a very valid sentiment, but not one that many people consider before marriage.
I've been happily married for nearly ten years now. We were 25 and 26 when we exchanged vows and "made it legal". But the older we get, and the more profound our relationship becomes, the more we wish we hadn't gotten married. It's an archaic, ridiculous construct, and we have considered getting divorced, but staying together. A legal contract has no bearing whatsoever on our commitment to one another. I have no doubt that we will spend the rest of our lives together (and we plan on doing so), but it's silly to have a form on file at the clerk's office stating so.
However, for better or for worse (har, har), my husband is a career naval officer, and neither I nor the children could family benefits if we were not married, nor could we reside in on-base housing or accompany him on overseas tours, so we remain legally married for the time being. Still, though, once his military career is over, we fully intend to file a divorce of social protest...and continue being one another's partner, best friend and lover. Isn't that more meaningful: to stay together because we genuinely want and choose to do so, not because the legal contract would make it too inconvenient?
Great post. Thank you for writing it.
Cheryl
Whitney Rearick — December 19, 2011
Thank you! I especially love your reasons why you're not married--and I share them.
Elfwreck — December 19, 2011
I *am* married, because when my partner of 6-years-and-a-baby died of a botched tonsillectomy, I couldn't sue. (The baby could sue. Kaiser will pay for her college education.) Next partner? We're doing it legal this time; 11 years and counting.
I am married because my job's health insurance doesn't cover domestic partnerships. Because it makes paying bills for each other easy. Because we can speak for each other to doctors, schools, and the DMV, without having to provide extra paperwork. (Or any. Nobody asks for proof that you're married when you want to pay the electricity bill.)
I am married as a matter of bureaucratic convenience. Our relationship doesn't need the paperwork; our civil existence as corporate cogs does.
Barb — December 19, 2011
Lisa - You should just retitle this post "Why I'm awesome"
I'm just repeating this because I agree. amazing post
Guest — December 19, 2011
I am tired to read one-sided articles like this, written by women that intervew woman, to talk about marriage or couple problems, never taking into account men´s point of view. Men are allways the bad guys of the film in these articles.
Marriage is a two people issue, and no failure is allways the fault of only one of them.
A Case of the Mondays: Links « Kay Steiger — December 19, 2011
[...] A very important post by Lisa Wade about why she’s not married. [Sociological Images] [...]
Anonymous — December 19, 2011
I read this article and was tempted to reference it, but it seemed so obviously awful I passed. Glad you took it on, though. Very good post.
Gahl — December 19, 2011
Sorry to ask some off topic questions, but I'm a little confused here– Lisa, if I'm not mistaken, you're a sociology professor for Occidental college, and Tracy McMillian is a TV staff writer for AMC, so in what way are the two of you colleagues?
Umlud — December 19, 2011
While I agree with many of your points, I have to point to one condition that you are failing to consider. (Well, if you did consider it, then either I didn't see it, or it wasn't covered very well.) In sum, conflating "government approval" with "government recognition" is a mistake that you are making in the first of your "just for the record" points. This is especially true with international couples, doubly true for those who are international and seeking employment in a third country.
If I want to live in the same country as my fiancee, and one of us doesn't have a job there, then a resident visa will almost never be given to the one who doesn't have the job. Resident visas (without a work or student visa) are usually only given to people who are being supported by the national or the person with the work visa (i.e., children or spouse - sometimes fiance/es).
Julio A. — December 19, 2011
I'm a loyal and frequent reader, but this post has left me conflicted. As someone who was proudly and happily married 18 months ago, I feel I'm being told I've made an ethically, socially, and logically irresponisble choice.
My partner and I got married last year, in spite of our four parents being 0 for 7 on marriage. Having learned a lot about relationships from them over the years, we'd learned a lot about how relationships require not only compromise, but sometimes sacrifice and also hard commitment. For five years we pursued our careers in different locations (about four hours flying), but decided our relationship was important and wanted to be together. It's been a year and half since we got married, and after MANY difficult conversations and decisions, we were able to make the necessary moves to live and work in the same place. We're absolutely thrilled to be finally living together agian.
For us, getting engaged and eventually married was about deciding to make sacrifices on both parts in order to be together, because being together in the long run was more important. It was a matter of coming before family/friends, God, and the state--the highest authorities (to us)--and being held accountable to making a lifelong commitment. The marriage institution has plenty of flaws, but I've always attributed to the institution, but not the marriage. I'm not disagreeing with Lisa's justification of her not getting married. I agree with all of it. When it comes down to it, however, my distaste for marriage institution doesn't trump my belief in the marriage commitment.
rootlesscosmo — December 19, 2011
Is it possible that MacMillan is kidding? That the "reasons" she offers are meant to point out the misogyny of conventional expectations, and/or to parody men's rationalizations for why any particular woman isn't married? If so, then the gap between normative--the misogynist conventions--and normal, or modal, is exactly what she's trying to call attention to. Whether she's doing it effectively, or readers are missing her point, are other questions, but I would at least consider that her intention may be satirical.
Larrycharleswilson — December 19, 2011
To quote: Never Explain, Never Apologize.
e h — December 20, 2011
Just because I'm married does not mean I can't leave my husband if I feel like it. Marriage vows are only as strong as you believe them to be. Thankfully, I love him more than the day we got married, but if I were ever to leave him, I would want to remain married for the simple fact that I wouldn't trust my own parents to take care of me if I ever needed them to (one is disabled and the other is a self-centered addict) but I would trust my husband, even if he became my ex. In fact, I wouldn't have married him if that weren't true.
Isabelle — December 20, 2011
I was so furious when I read that article, and even more after reading the comments.. And I was totally shocked that a friend of mine posted this and mutual friends thought it was just so funny! and omg soooo true! (cringe). Here is the response that I posted, I was trying to be nice:
I'm not a fan of the pseudoscience and the slut shaming... I'm more inclined to believe that the author was divorced 3 times because she's neurotic about trying to be a lot of things she thinks she's supposed to be, but is not. Here's how I would answer the question, if you're a 36-year-old woman who's never been married - because maybe you only *think* you want to get married, because silly articles say you should want to. but, subconsciously, you know your life is awesome as it is and you don't want to change a damn thing about it.
(elicited ranty responses about how the functioning of society is dependent on the family unit and therefore marriage)
eating worms — December 20, 2011
Nice article. Yes to all.
I express the historical aspect even more strongly probably: the original slave contract. Revolting.
"I feel I'm being told I've made an ethically, socially, and logically irresponisble choice."
Something I'm noticing on the thread - and it's something I've come across a lot IRL, on the very odd occasions I talk about my choice not to marry - is people choosing to perceive your expression of your choice and the reasons therefor as personal instruction or some kind of chastisement of their choice. But that's sort of the point of having a choice: we have a choice. If we are lucky.
Marry away, do whatever you want, peeps. Take your wedding photos stoned while bungying-jumping in sparkly cowboy hats and no undies. Whatevs man, as long as it's consensual. But I too have the right to have and talk about my choice without its mere expression being transformed into some implicit judgement of your choice. It's not an accusation, it's a choice. That's all. Back off.
confused — December 20, 2011
I am a bit confused at the rhetoric in these responses and in Lisa's original post. The first line of Tracy's article is "You want to get married." How disappointing it is to read the responses based on ignoring this first sentence. This is something that I tell my students in my intro class not to do ... I guess I was mistaken.
Ksbagley — December 20, 2011
Well, at least McMillian is an expert on how to get married. How to stay married, however, seems to have eluded her. Her advice for how to get married is practically a recipe for how to have an unhappy marriage.
Stanthegreater — December 20, 2011
I. Love. My Soulmate. That is enough.
Anonymous — December 21, 2011
So many good reasons! *sigh* I'm not married, but I'm in a dedicated relationship. We share house chores, are both breadwinners, and carefully choose our house together keeping both our desires in mind (and also keeping it affordable if one of us lost our job). Life is good, but what's the first thing I get asked around the holidays? "So... when are you getting married?" Uh, whenever? I'm engaged, but a piece of paper isn't going to suddenly change my life. My feelings for my other half (and his for me) aren't effected by a legal status. Right now, the big benefit would be health insurance (I don't have any.) But what about my friends who can't get married because gay marriage isn't legal? There's a lot a things about marriage that leave a sick taste in my mouth and I don't want join the married ranks without resolving these issues.
And for noisy relatives and friends... I've been telling them I'll marry sometime before or after the Apocalypse. It usually brings out a laugh and helps to redirect the conversations.
Celestial Bacon — December 23, 2011
Great post.
"I’m not married because I value the fact that my partner and I decide to be together every day, even though we don’t have to jump through legal hoops to do otherwise."
This is also true for me, but it's a reason I rarely see articulated elsewhere. Anyway, marriage is a problematic institution that has way too much normative support. Frankly, I was shocked (and delighted) to see Ron Paul publicly stating that government enshrinement of marriage isn't necessary, and that it should be a personal decision. I have never heard a presidential candidate speak against the marriage industrial complex before.
Gynomite’s Reading Room! « Gynomite! — December 23, 2011
[...] Sociological Images post answering Tracy MacMillan’s HuffPo post of why she’s not married, which has since been [...]
Guest — December 24, 2011
Thank you for pointing out the absurdity of that article. It helps to have a few people in the world acknowledge that for some of us out here living, the world seems to not want us anymore. McMillian of Mad Men is one of those people saying that the world does not want me, you're someone countering that awful voice.
Seriously?? — December 24, 2011
It's amazing how something that is CLEARLY supposed to be a tongue-in-cheek mockery of the magazine articles about marriage can be taken so seriously...
Malaka — December 24, 2011
great post! i just blogged about something similar here: "On Heteropatriarchy, Presidents and Families": http://hiphopcheerleader.blogspot.com/2011/12/on-heteropatriarchy-presidents-and.html
Víkendové surfovanie « life in progress — January 15, 2012
[...] prečo nie som vydatá [...]
Nein, ich will nicht – zum Ehe-Unbehagen « aufZehenspitzen — July 20, 2012
[...] so ist, habe ich für mich noch nicht zufriedenstellend beantwortet (erste Antwortansätze hier: Why I’m not married). Feministische Kritik an der Ehe hat ja eine lange Tradition – dem kann ich mich wohl nicht ganz [...]
devans00 — August 25, 2012
The "right one" hasn't shown up yet. You can't marry what's not there.
Some Unorthodox Thoughts on Marriage | the Soil and the Worker — June 29, 2013
[...] Lisa Wade of Sociological Images and Occidental College has a list of reasons as to why she is not married, one that is coated in self-righteous language, e.g. “I don’t want or need the state’s approval,” “the history of marriage is ugly and anti-woman,” “I’m opposed to the marriage industrial complex,” and “I don’t believe in giving social and economic benefits to some kinds of relationships and not others.” The only reasons to possibly marry, she seems to insinuate, are purely utilitarian, such as for legal benefits. There is no “good” reason for most people, especially someone in my own position, to marry in today’s society. Her language implies an inverse, that those who choose to marry desire the state’s approval, are reproducing a sexist and heterosexist institution, and are commodifying relationships. It’s not cool, let alone progressive [the symbolic principle], to be married. [...]
Mayra Lepe Blog | ucrsoc142blog — July 2, 2015
[…] http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2011/12/19/why-im-not-married/ […]
Occidental Professor @LisaWade: Heterosexual Men Are Predators : The Other McCain — September 5, 2016
[…] Ah, but once you start paying the Dane-geld, you never get rid of the Dane, and the more college administrators try to satisfy campus feminist demands, the more demanding campus feminists become. One wonders if Occidental College’s president knows what is being taught in the school’s Gender, Women, & Sexuality Studies program. Does he not realize that Professor Wade, for example, is against marriage? […]
Occidental Professor @LisaWade: Heterosexual Men Are Predators | Living in Anglo-America — September 6, 2016
[…] Ah, but once you start paying the Dane-geld, you never get rid of the Dane, and the more college administrators try to satisfy campus feminist demands, the more demanding campus feminists become. One wonders if Occidental College’s president knows what is being taught in the school’s Gender, Women, & Sexuality Studies program. Does he not realize that Professor Wade, for example, is against marriage? […]