Arlie Hochschild, in her book The Second Shift, discusses a modern tension in American households resulting from a “stalled gender revolution,” i.e., the fact that women and the social construction of femininity have changed and men and masculinity have not caught up with these changes. These tensions erupt when assigning responsibilities in the second shift of household labor and childcare, which often fall upon wives’ shoulders. Traditionally, the dominant construction of masculinity does not allow men to participate in housework, such as laundry, since it is threatening to their sense of masculinity. In fact, as argued by Julie Brines, the economic model of dependency holds for women but not for men. Men can essentially trade in their salaries for the domestic labor performed by their wife; however, when women out-earn their husbands, they cannot seem to strike a similar bargain. In this case, since the man is not fulfilling his traditional role as provider, he essentially refuses to further damage his reputation by engaging in “woman’s work” in the home.
Enter Tide:
In this Tide commercial, we see this threatening element of housework, as the “Dad Mom” tries to justify his laundry proficiency by reasserting his masculinity. At the end, he confirms that he is still a man as he declares that he will “go do pull ups and crunches,” one would assume in order to build up his manly muscles. Beyond this direct statement of his attempts to embody masculinity, throughout the commercial, we see three themes — normative heterosexuality, competition among men, and the codification of laundry as feminine — used to excuse his role as homemaker.
He first makes the claim that he is at home “being awesome,” and proceeds to explain how. He stresses his unique (and alluring) mixture of masculinity and nurturing. By describing himself in this way for the sake of the “Mom Moms,” he alludes to his heterosexuality, a basic element of hegemonic masculinity, in an attempt to establish some sex appeal.
Second, there is a competitive element to his dialogue as he boasts to other dads about his ability to dress a four-year-old and skills at folding a “frilly dress with complete accuracy.” By making it a competition, he rationalizes his participation in housework. Boom!
Finally, this “dad mom” uses the “brute strength of dad” in combination with the “nurturing abilities of my laundry detergent” to complete this basis household task. The task of doing laundry and the detergent, itself, is codified as feminine. This combination is a “smart” one because this is exactly what women need: more men doing the laundry.
Amanda M. Czerniawski is an Assistant Professor of Sociology at Temple University. She specializes in bodies and culture, gender and sexuality, and medical sociology. Her past research projects involved the development of height and weight tables and the role of plus-size models in constructions of beauty. Her current research focuses on the contested role of the body in contemporary feminist discourse.
If you would like to write a post for Sociological Images, please see our Guidelines for Guest Bloggers.
Comments 35
LunaZola — November 9, 2011
I've actually never seen this version of the commercial. I've only seen the short version on television, but I have to say the contrast between the long and short version is interesting. I really really like the short version and it has a completely different messages than the video above.
Albert — November 9, 2011
I read the video in a totally different way: the man is making fun of pressures of masculinity, not using masculinity to justify doing home chores. His 'being awesome' doesn't stem from him wrapping mom moms round his fingers, or that he folds the cloths in a supermasculine way, but he is awesome because he doesn't care about society's framing of a stay-at-home dad as non-masculine. Offcourse his statement that he will do push-ups and crunches in the end is totally ironic, as is the rest of the commercial.
Mashed Potatoes — November 9, 2011
I'm just happy to see a male figure selling laundry for once. Every cleaning supply, spray, and fart smell killing candle has a lady smiling about something in the advertisement. What about all the men that need some Clorox Wipes?
Also happy to see that advertisers woke up to the fact that there are more stay at home husbands because of the economic downturn.
Umlud — November 9, 2011
When did doing laundry become a feminine thing? I always hated the constant commercial after commercial of women doing laundry for their family, effectively looking like they stepped out of the 1950s, cleaning up after their careless husbands and rambunctious sons. *YAWN*
This, one, though (and the short)? That's something that's refreshing to see.
Umlud — November 9, 2011
I gotta agree with a lot of what the OP says. However, this point is a little bit... I dunno:
It seems to take the analysis a little too far. After all, it's a commercial for a laundry detergent, and the producers of the commercial must recognize that they live within a society that has become used to (or perhaps expect) a certain characterization of what is inimical to a laundry detergent commercial. Furthermore, it's a commercial for a product that is aimed at a vast swath of America. It's not meant -- in that sense -- to be a political statement of, "Change your social constructions about gender and work," but is a commercial statement of, "Buy our product."
I would say that Tide is trying to appeal to a different market, and, if successful, you can imagine that other laundry detergent companies will be jumping on board with similar imagery in their commercials. However, in as much as they are trying to change social constructs, I would argue that they are only doing it to increase the appeal of an already well-known product.
Who knows, though: perhaps -- just like the creation of Virginia Slims cigarettes for women -- Tide will become the detergent of choice for men, and then women can congratulate their husbands and boyfriends, saying, "You've come a long way, baby." ;)
Sparkle — November 9, 2011
"a “stalled gender revolution,” i.e., the fact that women and the social construction of femininity have changed and men and masculinity have not caught up with these changes."
Gee... maybe men and masculinity have caught up, but are being stifiled. Ever heard of the men's movement? It's 30+ years old, came out of second wave feminism... ring any bells?
The only reason the mens gender revolution is stalled is because third wave feminism put a wrench in the gears.
Denise Torres — November 9, 2011
This is part of a series of "My Tide" commercials and when stripped out of that context does an injustice to a fairly clever campaign that winks at the audience and pokes fun of those very same hegemonic images (eg, there is an older couple with a man in the latest denim fashion speaking to the particular ink name, an African American couple with the girlfriend snoring on her partner's chest because of the comforting smell, there is a couple with triplets doing laundry together, etc.). Geertz would be proud.
Sarah B. Castillo — November 9, 2011
It's hard for me to get my head around this because my dad was a homemaker in our family. I thought it was a dad job until I showed up at kindergarten and got the notion thoroughly socialized out of my.
grumplefish — November 9, 2011
This commercial actually reminds of the idea that a father is a 'hero' if he spends even an hour watching the kids, but a mom is just expect to do that stuff as a baseline. His pride in his accuracy at folding frilly dresses is entirely based on the idea that it's difficult for him BECAUSE he's a man. He reassures the viewer during the commercial that he still has power over mom moms. The whole "dad mom" premise is reifying the idea that folding laundry etc. is a baseline expectation for women, but going above and beyond for guys. I would love it if, in general, people valued the labor of homemakers more. However, what I see here is that men's labor, no matter what it is, is valuable and important and awesome, whereas women's labor is mundane and unworthy of attention. In this instance, men are encourage to pat themselves on the back for going "above and beyond" what could reasonable be expected of them by being a stay-at-home dad, where as being a stay-at-home mom remains unappreciated.
Henn — November 9, 2011
How about this one...!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9LTRbWsGOI&feature=relmfu
Thelacqueredlady — November 9, 2011
So there is a very similar commercial (it may be by Tide) with a stay at home dad talking about how he likes and excels at doing housework. It ends with his little girl running up on his lap and asking him to braid her hair. He asks her if she wants a "fishtail" braid or another variant. Does anyone know the commercial I am talking about? It is very sweet and portrays being a stay at home dad in a very positive way.
Also, I too took this to be an ironic commercial. In that way, I find it very positive.
» Shifters Epicene Cyborg — November 14, 2011
[...] Women and the social construction of femininity have changed and men and masculinity have not caught... @12:44 am Comment (0) [...]
Links of the Week: A Gender special | Lindypenguin — July 7, 2014
[…] a related note Amanda Czerniawski has some interesting commentary on Sociological Images on the following laundry powder […]
Dads in Ads: Are Times Changing? | Sociology with LDV — February 20, 2015
[…] an appearance in an ad, they have been accompanied by an explanation for why their unique take on parenting can be manly, implying that childcare is still women’s […]
Dads in Ads: Are Times Changing? - Treat Them Better — February 20, 2015
[…] an appearance in an ad, they have been accompanied by an explanation for why their unique take on parenting can be manly, implying that childcare is still women’s […]
Dads in Advertising: Are Times Changing? | Welcome to the Doctor's Office — October 19, 2015
[…] an appearance in an ad, they have been accompanied by an explanation for why their unique take onparenting can be manly, implying that childcare is still women’s […]