In Cultures of War: Pearl Harbor/Hiroshima/9-11/Iraq, John Dower discusses how the U.S. responded to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941. Militarily, it pushed the U.S. into officially entering World War II, but Dower is just as interested in cultural responses, particularly efforts to stigmatize all U.S. residents of Japanese descent as unpatriotic or even traitorous.
A prime example of this is the film December 7th, created by John Ford, legendary director of classics such as Stagecoach and The Grapes of Wrath. The first version of the film was 82 minutes long. In it, an idealistic figure representing the U.S. talks with “C,” a figure meant to represent his conscience. Uncle Sam naively believes the racial and ethnic diversity of Hawaii isn’t a problem, but C helps him see that the large Japanese American population is a threat, even when they appear to be loyal, patriotic, assimilated Americans. Japanese-language telephone books and newspapers are ominously shown as evidence of their lack of true American-ness. Start at about 8:40:
The message is unequivocal: Japanese Americans are untrustworthy, and any actions or behaviors that seems to indicate that a Japanese American is loyal to the U.S. provides potential evidence of just how deceitful they are — they cover their treachery with an appearance of patriotism. At around 18:25, Uncle Sam tries to defend freedom of religion, but C patiently explains the problem with this view. C says he’s not saying all Japanese Americans are disloyal, but that he’s “just presenting the facts,” and can’t be responsible for separating the loyal from the disloyal.
Ford cut the film down to 34 minutes before releasing it. This shortened version of December 7th won the 1943 Oscar for Best Documentary Short Subject:
The attack scene from December 7th is often assumed to be actual documentary footage of the attack on Pearl Harbor, but Dower points out that it was almost entirely staged by Ford, since there was almost no existing film of the surprise attack available.
Dower also discusses the animated Disney film Victory through Air Power. The film was based on the book Victory through Air Power, by Alexander Seversky. Seversky’s book justifies bombing non-combatant targets as a way to demoralize the enemy and disrupt supply lines and communication. Civilians would no longer be seen as inherently off-limits for military operations. The film served as propaganda for this view, which increasingly took hold in the U.S. military, eventually justifying dropping nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
You can find the entire film on Youtube, but the most relevant segment is at the end; the widespread bombing of (noticeably resident-free) Japanese cities is presented as key to a glorious victory by the U.S.:
These films served to justify military strategies (internment camps and bombing non-military targets) that could have faced stiff resistance by drawing on popular fears in the wake of the Pearl Harbor attack. In both cases, they widened the circle of legitimate potential targets of war-related government actions to not just Japanese soldiers and government officials but to the entire civilian population of Japan, as well as anyone with Japanese ancestry living in the U.S.
Comments 15
Kelly Lenza — July 25, 2011
Funnily enough, my husband and I just sat down and watched Victory Through Air Power two nights ago. While the film is certainly dated, and a cartoon - which relies on exaggerations of stereotypes for humor quite often - the film overall has very little hatred in it, I would say, despite being about war. The film at least (I've not read the book) is purely a strategic argument. Part of the "civilians no longer being off limits" view was as a reason why the US should have a strong Air Force - not necessarily to victimize other countries, but because US civilians were at risk and not "off limits" after other countries began to utilize strong air forces.
I am sure a scholar like Dower has more detailed input than a lay person with a passing interest in WWII, but I know I am very sensitive to racial and societal issues, and I really didn't get anything like that from Victory Through Air Power. If you are making the argument that it is inherently outdated and immoral simply for implying that civilians are game as war targets, I can understand that, just keep in mind that they were also applying that to the general American populace. The draw for my husband and I to watch the film was simply the novelty of air power being so new at the time, and air strategy being very up in the air, to use a pun.
Maya Rogers — July 26, 2011
After reading the part about Hawaii, I can't help but think about the parallels to Muslims and other immigrants in the United States today (and around the world). Almost any time someone wants to open a mosque/halal restaurant people complain and say that doing so is "un-American". Another example is when communities have a lot of Spanish are targeted. Despite the United States having no official language and separation of church and state, anything and anyone that differs from the norm of what an "American" should be like is called on as proof of a lack of "true" patriotism.
eduardo — July 26, 2011
I can see why someone might try to justify this old propaganda; I'm under the impression however that most folks back then were rather simple. I haven't seen this sort of propaganda launched in modern times as in “We remember 9/11 with VENGEANCE in our hearts!” I find this propaganda pieces very interesting, sort of windows into that society.
Yrro Simyarin — July 26, 2011
So this is slightly off topic, but all the anti-Japanese propaganda posts made me curious about what anti-american propaganda looked like in Japan.
http://www.psywarrior.com/JapanPSYOPWW2.html
I find the caricatures of europeans especially interesting.
Please don't see this as a "well they did it, so it's ok" rationalizing... especially since much of the American propaganda was working against their own citizens, I would say it was worse. I just thought it was also interesting, to put things in a broader context.
Elena — July 26, 2011
You can find the entire film on Youtube, but the most relevant segment
is at the end; the widespread bombing of (noticeably resident-free)
Japanese cities is presented as key to a glorious victory by the U.S.
For some semi-autobiographical accounts of "victory through air power" seen from ground level by Japanese civilians, you have Hotaru no Haka ("Grave of the Fireflies") and Hadashi no Gen ("Barefoot Gen").
Not that the Japanese were innocent of war crimes, of course, but Americans seldom see the POV of civilian victims of aerial bombardments other than, perhaps, London during the Blitz.
Paul Azpeitia — March 20, 2012
Oh jeez, people, we were trying to win a war, an existential struggle, against an enemy that would not surrender, that made a habit of practicing cannibalism, eupehmized as "local resupply" or something similar against both captured Allied troops, and Chinese, Korean, and Filipino/Phillipino civilians, in addition to experimenting on them in ways that surpassed the Nazis, and who also starved Allied military and civilian prisoners to death, when it wasn't forced-marching them to death, beheading them for fun, and raping and killing civilian women as a matter of course. Oh, and when retreating from areas, they burned prisoners alive or shot them all to death.
Sociological Images course guide: Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders : Asian-Nation : Asian American News, Issues, & Current Events Blog — April 16, 2013
[...] More World War II Anti-Japanese Propaganda [...]