This weekend I went to the Annenberg Space for Photography in Los Angeles to see the Beauty CULTure exhibit. The description of the show suggested a critical perspective on beauty:
Through different lenses focused on the body beautiful, the exhibition examines both traditional and unconventional definitions of beauty, challenging stereotypes of gender, race and age. It explores the links between beauty and violence, glamour and sexuality and the cost (in its multiple meanings) of beauty.
The exhibit, to be fair, included a 30-minute documentary that touched on several critiques: the socialization of children, the pressure felt by adult women, the role of capitalism, and sizism and racism in the industry (featuring Lauren Greenfield’s work on girl culture and weight loss camps and Susan Anderson on child pageants).
But the actual photographs in the exhibit overwhelmingly affirmed instead of challenged our beauty culture. While the four images above, highlighted at the website, include an Asian woman, an older woman, and a picture of a child beauty pageant contestant designed to make us question how we raise children, the actual photographs were mostly conventionally-attractive, white, thin professional models glamorously outfitted, posed, and lit. These photographs outnumbered those that included women of color, older women, “plus-size” women, and critical images (e.g., photos of cosmetic surgeries) by something like 10 to 1. I didn’t leave feeling like I’d gained some perspective on the crushing pressure to be “perfect”; I left feeling like I’d flipped through a Cosmopolitan, awash in idealized images of female beauty, and more consciously aware of my deficiencies than when I arrived.
I say, skip it.
Lisa Wade, PhD is an Associate Professor at Tulane University. She is the author of American Hookup, a book about college sexual culture; a textbook about gender; and a forthcoming introductory text: Terrible Magnificent Sociology. You can follow her on Twitter and Instagram.
Comments 14
$ocraTTTe$ — July 25, 2011
You should go watch Harmony Korine's Gummo if you want to see people who actually defy conventions of beauty. It's a non-stop showcase of people who are physically, mentally and spiritually repulsive by the standards of mainstream culture. The film embodies a good deal of what our society chooses to mock, hate and ultimately ignore.
Incidentally, if you leave the film merely feeling "less fat and ugly," you may have missed the point. I'm not sure what the point was, the movie doesn't make a whole lot of sense, but it definitely isn't about feeling better about yourself in relation to other people.
Megan — July 25, 2011
Hi Lisa. What's wrong with feeling fat? I feel fat all the time! :)
I. — July 25, 2011
I haven't been to this exhibition, so I can't comment if the selected photographs were truly limited in their scope on beauty. But I don't think I would skip it for that reason. There is sociological value in exploring what a curated art show deems to be beautiful, whether or not your own perception of beauty coincides with it or not.
From what I gather, the exhibition focuses on aesthetic and culturally sanctioned notions of visual beauty, so I don't expect or demand it to be all-encompassing and metaphorical. Yes, beauty can exist in all "flaws" and quirks and distractions, in one's character or personality, in their graceful movement and voice (or lack thereof). All this is often referred to as "true" beauty, and I tend to agree with that sentiment.
But there is something to be said about pure visual human beauty. It may be subjective, it may be socially constructed, but when confronted with it, it can be a devastation on the senses. This kind of beauty is to be enjoyed for what it is; skin deep, but deeply felt nonetheless. Everyone may have aspects to their being that make them astoundingly beautiful, but not everyone is beautiful in that literal, skin deep sense. In my opinion, pure aesthetic beauty is rare, (just as I think pure aesthetic ugliness is rare), and a gift for those bestowed with it. Why can't we celebrate and enjoy others' beauty, without guilt-ridden associations and self-loathing?
Satchel — July 25, 2011
Might you possibly have meant the "sexualization" of children rather than the "socialization"?
Cmscott — July 25, 2011
Lisa, I went to the same exhibit this weekend. And you know what I, a fat queer woman, got out of it? That beauty is problematic in every culture and that I'm not alone in feeling out of touch with the standards set forth by the beauty industry. I'm okay with that message. I'm sorry that you got a different message. I say, don't skip it; it was extremely worthwhile to me and gave me a lot to think about. In fact, I'm planing to return for two of the upcoming workshops if I can.
lorraine kennedy — July 25, 2011
Don't forget, you are not just un-beautiful, you are fat and poor and old....
Anonymous — July 30, 2011
Why am I not suprised the "beauty" is predominately white & skinny. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
The Mirror Cracked — The Good Men Project — August 14, 2011
[...] Wolf’s The Beauty Myth (1991) it has been accepted that we should be critical of how women’s Body Image is affected by representation. But less thought or attention has been given to men in this [...]
Sailor_audrey — October 9, 2011
I was also disappointed with the exhibit, and can completely understand why it would make women feel the way that you do. It was nothing like the banners and promotion led me to believe.
"I left feeling like I’d flipped through a Cosmopolitan, awash in idealized images of female beauty..." is pretty much how I felt.