We’ve posted before on the tendency for female, but not male, athletes to be featured in glamorous or sexualized ways that highlight their femininity instead of their athleticism. See, for example, our posts on WNBA player Candace Parker and the Florida State University’s women’s basketball team. Kirsten W. sent in another nice example. In this case, it’s two tennis players at the height of their careers: Roger Federer and Anna Kournikova.
Federer is pictured as we might expect, doing what he is famous for doing, playing tennis:
(source)
In contrast, Kournikova is pictured like this:
(source)
Kirsten writes:
[Kournikova]… is presented in a very typical “female” way, with her long hair down (it would generally be pulled during a game), flowing over a pink frilly nightgown that suggests she’s in bed, and potentially waiting for company.
In 2000 when this issue of Sports Illustrated was released, Kournikova was on fire. She was ranked 8th in singles and 4th in doubles… in the world. Yet, Sports Illustrated decided to portray her not as an amazing athlete, but softly: as a beautiful, perhaps receptive woman.
Later Kournikova would abandon tennis for modeling. Many argue that she did so because she failed as a tennis player, I wonder if she went into modeling, in part, because her appearance made people take her less seriously as an athlete.
Lisa Wade, PhD is an Associate Professor at Tulane University. She is the author of American Hookup, a book about college sexual culture; a textbook about gender; and a forthcoming introductory text: Terrible Magnificent Sociology. You can follow her on Twitter and Instagram.
Comments 22
Scatx — January 14, 2011
This is not true for Serena Williams, though. She has been featured on the cover of Sports Illustrated multiple times in action shots. See this website for examples: http://www.downthelinetennis.com/2010/07/look-back-serena-williams-has-it.html
Jon — January 14, 2011
I think this is an important concern, but I also think it has been fairly well established that Sports Illustrated does not regularly feature female athletes on their cover (and has in fact decreased since the 1950s). While I understand that this issue is worth repeating, I just wish there was a bit more substance to this post (or at least references to other analyses/studies of this).
And perhaps “her appearance made people take her less seriously as an athlete”, Kournikova also dealt with a series of injuries (even her Wikipedia entry details this in the section “2001-03: Injuries and final years”) that might also have influenced her retirement from professional tennis. Yes, her objectification may have influenced her decision to change careers, but without any real evidence we’re just making conjectures.
Michele — January 14, 2011
Maybe if Kournikova won something she would have been taking more seriously as an athlete. People thinking she was pretty didn't hurt her career it lasted much longer than it should have because of her looks. Plain Anna with the same record is a tennis pro at a county club. Pretty Anna is a model.
LexieDi — January 14, 2011
See... When I look at the first cover I go "That guy is good at tennis." When I look at the second cover, I don't think anything about tennis. I think of it as another (annoying) magazine cover.
It's so stupid to have someone who's great for doing something and not show them doing it in a magazine about them. It makes no sense to me. I would want to know about a woman who is great at tennis! I don't want to know about this girl, however she looks, because she looks like every other person on every other magazine.
Grizzly — January 14, 2011
Both options presented for why Anna went into modeling assume it wasn't primarily her choice; she either went into modeling because she failed at tennis, or because her looks caused her not to be taken seriously as an athlete. Wouldn't a third option be that she prefers modeling? It's possible she had input into the SI cover, and wanted to do something softer as a stepping stone to a modeling career.
Michele — January 16, 2011
@Noanodyne, I'm saying Anna stayed as relevant for as long as she did because of her looks. Her endorsements had nothing to do with her skill as a player. Anna never won a major tournament as a single player. She get to fourth round play on her own a total of six times. All of her major title wins came when she played doubles mostly with Martina Hingis a player ranked higher than she was. Anna without her looks would not have been on the cover of SI. Any other women with a record as weaks as Anna would not have been doing endorsements or made it to the cover on SI.
northwest is best — January 18, 2011
Just wanted to share an advert being shown here in the UK at the moment, featuring cyclist Victoria Pendleton:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgJdu3q7xqc
At the end her recommendation for eating some healthy brown bread is 'just as well when you wear Lycra for a living', instead of 'just as well when you're a world class athlete'.
m — May 21, 2013
why do feminists hate being woman so much?
A critical analysis of how Anna Kournikova was represented in the sports media – Ewan's Sport Blog — July 28, 2020
[…] Thesocietypages.com (2011) – ‘His and Hers Sports Illustrated Covers – Sociological Images’ by Lisa Wade at: https://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2011/01/14/portraying-athletes-his-and-hers-sports-illustrated… […]
Bares — September 29, 2024
I've been exploring various online resources lately, and this particular site stood out to me. The community vibe is fantastic; I love that I can engage with others who share my interests. It feels like a welcoming space where everyone’s opinions are valued. If you want to join a lively discussion, you should definitely visit https://1winkorean.com/. It’s a great place to connect with like-minded individuals!