Cosmopolitan Magazine has been around since 1886 so it has seen quite a great deal of change over that time. The evolution of The Cosmopolitan Magazine into what is known today as Cosmo shows just how dramatic that change has been. In its early days, The Cosmopolitan was billed as a woman’s fashion magazine that included articles on the home, family, and cooking, but also included articles like “Some Examples of Recent Art” and “The Progress of Science.”
Later it became more focused as a showcase for new fiction and published works by authors like Upton Sinclair, Sinclair Lewis, Kurt Vonnegut, Willa Cather, and H. G. Wells. Typically, each issue would have five to eight short-stories, a full novelette, a full short novel, and some article on fashion and health. During this time, the cover art was almost exclusively illustrated — even when the covers featured celebrities.
With the introduction of television, there was a drastic decline in the demand for fiction-based magazines. In response to the waning sales there was a radical shift in the direction of Cosmopolitan. In the mid sixties, Helen Gurley Brown stepped in as editor in chief. She brought with her the message of sexual freedom for single women, and started replacing the cover illustrations with photos of young models in minimal clothing. Sales increased as a result.
Since then the magazine has become more sexually centered. It still features many articles on having pleasurable sex and maintain fulfilling relationships. There is a much greater emphasis on how women can make themselves more desirable to men. One look at the website reveals the tone of the magazine. These are the first three articles listed:
“4 Traits Men Find Irresistible”
“What Men Secretly Think of your Hair and Makeup”
“What You Should Do if He Cheats”
The late Kurt Vonnegut (who had multiple short stories featured in Cosmopolitan in the fifties) had this to say about the magazine: “One monthly that bought several of my stories, Cosmopolitan, now survives as a harrowingly explicit sex manual.” Indeed, browsing through the cover art of the past few years gives one the impression that there are an infinite number of sex positions. It is hard to feel sexually liberated while reading a magazine that talks about the vagina (or Hoo-Ha) like it’s something you can buy at a pet store. They have also been criticized for perpetuating a nearly impossible standard of beauty and for retouching models to make them appear thinner. Today Cosmopolitan retains almost no reminants of its origins. It is fascinating to see how it has shifted with the culture and how our culture has changed because of it.
Sources: here, here, here, here, here, here, and here.
—————————–
Lauren McGuire is a SocImages intern and an assistant to a disability activist. She recently launched her own blog, The Fatal Foxtrot, that is focused on the awkward passage into adulthood.
If you would like to write a post for Sociological Images, please see our Guidelines for Guest Bloggers.
Comments 50
AJD — April 26, 2010
There's something touchingly quaint about the caption "Audrey Hepburn wears pretty clothes in her new movie."
Sal — April 26, 2010
I am old enough to have read Cosmopolitan before Helen Gurley Brown took over. It was definitely a magazine for readers. Not only was there a large fiction section, but the articles were generally thoughtful and/or thought provoking.
Gradually the articles became more aimed at getting and pleasing a man and the fiction became snippets of erotic fantasy.
Now when I see an issue of Cosmopolitan I am saddened that it seems to be directed to an audience with the collective attention span of a gnat. Any portion that pretends to be an article seems limited to bullets and twitter-esque snark.
Unfortunately, the same fate has overcome many once-helpful magazines.
Em — April 26, 2010
I shudder to think of how many young women Cosmo has affected negatively.
Interestingly enough, when I used to get CosmoGIRL! as a teenager, the content within was far more thought-provoking and mature than its predecessor, and it was a magazine for teens! And now it's out of business. Maybe if they would have included the monthly list of "How To Touch a Penis Creatively So He Won't Get Bored and Leave You" it'd still be around.
sarah — April 26, 2010
@AJD, i thought the same thing :)
@Em, absolutely, i used to buy magazines all the time but decided to cut them out completely a few years ago, if i compare how i feel about myself after flicking through a mag like that to how feel when i don't, it makes me wonder why i ever bought them. I used to read cosmogirl too, I from what I remember it was pretty good, I know I learnt a lot about sexual health and stds from it.
Also, I find it hilarious that Vonnegut was published in Cosmo :) would so not happen today.
Alex — April 26, 2010
I find the 70's issue the most interesting of these examples--it really shows the transition of the magazine from more serious content to "harrowingly explicit sex manual." You've got a couple of sex articles, a couple of health articles, and some fairly serious literary fiction, all in the same place. And in the recent one it's all sex, all the time, except for one article about not gettin' raped.
@ Sal: All magazines are going in that direction. The last time I bought an issue of "Better Homes and Gardens" (a magazine I used to love), I aged through the whole thing looking for an article and never found one. It's all bulleted lists, multi-colored text boxes, and photo captions. When I look at old magazines, it strikes me how the *advertisements* from as recently as the 80's have more text than the *articles* today.
Sarah — April 27, 2010
I just love the "get a healthy, sexy vagina" headline. Like what, the primary sex organ of a woman is not inherently "sexy"? If a vagina isn't sexy, I don't know what is. Perhaps the article discusses waxing, or kegels, or labiaplasty, or some other way to sex up your sex.
I'm ashamed to say that I read Cosmo as a teenager, shortly after I stopped reading Seventeen, and absolutely attribute a lifelong struggle with eating disorders in large part to these rags. Thankfully, I can now find a perineum on my own and no longer need Cosmo's recycled sex tips.
b — April 27, 2010
Really interesting how a change that reflected women's liberation and the sexual revolution in the 70s is now serving basically the opposite purpose. The sex articles are no longer there to empower women, but to remind us how woefully inadequate we would be as lovers without Cosmo's sage advice.
I remember in high school, when my friends and I thought it was hilarious to pick a Cosmo article at random and read it out loud to each other in a crowded bookstore. I think the worst was one going into great detail about how, exactly to move your hand around your guy's penis during a hand job.
amy — April 27, 2010
"She brought with her the message of sexual freedom for single women, and started replacing the cover illustrations with photos of young models in minimal clothing." It's hilarious that sexual freedom for women means *women* wear very little and are there to be looked at. Sexual freedom for straight men usually implies that they're free to look at and desire *women*, not free to turn *themselves* into sex objects. Faux liberation strikes again.
J. — April 27, 2010
I bought an old copy of Cosmopolitan from 1910 for five bucks at a used bookstore. It features two short stories (one a man vs. wilderness adventure yarn and the other a woman burns with secret love sort of thing), an article debating the merits of vivisection on cats and dogs in the name of science (with startlingly graphic photographs and quotes from notable figures like Charles Dickens and Tolstoy arguing against the practice), and a survey of the theater at the time with photographs of the actors.
I assumed that it was a different magazine, even though it shared the name, until I looked up the Wikipedia article later.
Liz — April 27, 2010
It might be "harrowingly explicit" but it's also completely useless as a sex manual. The advice it gives is all horrible, and the way they present it by suggesting 'hot surprises' instead of encouraging you to talk to your partner and actually find out what you'd both like is even worse.
It's a gender role indoctrination manual that encourages insecurity and discourages communication across gender lines.
Original Will — April 27, 2010
My wife used to get Cosmo for light reading. I leafed through it from time to time laughing at some of the absolutely ridiculous statements in the articles like "men don't like to cuddle." Anyway, I can't prove it now, but I swear that I saw the exact same article reprinted, verbatim, a little over a year apart.
So I guess they don't have to keep coming up with new worthless advice.
sapphirecat — April 27, 2010
Recently, supermarkets in my area have started obscuring the cover of Cosmo on the racks. Of course, most of the issues have “SEX” in huge, heavy letters, along with something about pleasing yourself or your man…
Vanessa — April 28, 2010
The last one is horrible
Charlotte — April 29, 2010
"Harrowingly explicit" indeed! thanks, Vonnegut, for that little comment on lady issues. am I the only one who's sort of uncomfortable at the whole "it used to be about nice things like kitchen care, but now it's nothing but DEBAUCHERY!!"? I mean, it's not like Cosmo used to be less sexist. Maybe it was more intellectually stimulating, but weren't most of the stories written by men anyway? No guarantees of female empowerment there.
I think it's really fascinating how it's changed over the years, along with other non-lady-centric publications, but the "eugh, all it has these days is SEX MANUALS" commentary strikes me as not terribly progressive.
Stephanie — April 30, 2010
One aspect of the continued popularity of Cosmo that needs to be taken into account is that the magazine wouldn't be printing the "articles" that it does if the readers didn't respond to them and purchase them due to the racy and sexist content. If women don't want to be portrayed as a man's sexual object then maybe they shouldn't be reading a magazine that is teaching them how to be exactly that. Cosmo is only living up to the standards that we as a society are holding it to. That being said, sometimes women do want advice on sex and there is nothing wrong with that as long as it doesn't turn into a culture of women simply striving to please their men without any reciprocal reward. And it would be nice if Cosmo branched out into other subjects that women are interested in, they could draw in a larger audience (and thus more profits) if they didn't so narrowly limit their content to one of a sexual nature.
Interesting posts, weekend of 5/2/10 « Feminists with Female Sexual Dysfunction — May 2, 2010
[...] Guest Post: The Evolution of Cosmopolitan Magazine – a very interesting retrospective of the history of Cosmo magazine. Via WM. [...]
Christie — May 3, 2010
Hello! Christie, the Senior Web Editor for Cosmopolitan.com, here. I think it's great you dug up those old covers...and it's an interesting post! For those of you interested in seeing more, I just wanted to pass on our online Cosmo Cover Gallery, which has covers from the past 10 years.
http://www.cosmopolitan.com/quizzes-games/cosmo-cover-gallery
Cheers
Hoo-Ha | Big Mental Disease — May 5, 2010
[...] evolution of Cosmo Magazine, from quite readable and literate, to pure shite. 0 var a2a_config = a2a_config [...]
The Pill and the Invention of the Monthly Cycle » Sociological Images — May 6, 2010
[...] also previous posts from Lauren on social psychology and policing by race and the evolution of Cosmopolitan magazine. var addthis_language = 'en'; 9 Comments Tags: abortion/reproduction, gender, gender: [...]
Rant Soup: the ladies’ edition(guys probably not interested) « I like to blog morgue than words can say… — May 16, 2010
[...] I’m not the only one who noticed that Cosmo magazine has changed drastically. http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2010/04/26/guest-post-the-evolution-of-cosmopolitan-magazine/ ==================== Myths about [...]
d henderson — May 21, 2010
We really enjoy the older Cosmopolitan magazines. Stunning covers and great literature combined! They should bring back the illustrated cover and excellent literature. Make it smarter. Thanks for the excellent post. You can see some great vintage Cosmo covers here: http://tinyurl.com/35g577t & http://tinyurl.com/yb4sfsr
James — June 21, 2010
You know what scares me about Cosmo?
My step-daughters are 11 and 13. Their friends read it. I find it seriously troubling...
Links of Great Interest: You make my heart… | The Hathor Legacy — August 13, 2010
[...] Contexts.org also highlights Cosmo’s evolution over the years. [...]
Blix — October 15, 2011
Please world, please see that sexuality is not a toy. Please see the pain and numbing effect that comes from a sex-saturated society. It is a wonderful gift from God to enjoy, but of course we have to pervert it into something that hurts others and ruins lives.
Sex, Cosmo, and Karl Marx (5 Hilarious Mash-ups) | Intent BlogIntent Blog — April 29, 2013
[...] After some time it transitioned into more of a literary magazine, publishing works by writers like Upton Sinclair, Kurt Vonnegut, Willa Cather, and H. G. [...]
Cosmic Love, Despair and Change: How Cosmo is either really relevant or totally not | Welcome To The Patriarchy — June 26, 2013
[...] tips like “put a donut around his penis and nibble it off” has published the likes of Kurt Vonnegut, Upton Sinclair and Willa Cather. So what [...]
Framing magazines - a comparison of the covers then and now – Poster Frame Depot — July 26, 2013
[...] the covers, rather than illustrations. Since Brown’s innovative changes, there has been some controversy in regards to article topics, Kurt Vonnegut stating, “One monthly that bought several of my [...]
Two for Tuesday — Bottom Line of Art and Design | SJG Our Space — July 30, 2013
[...] of the world. Brave, innovative and dare I say shrewd, oh and they happen to be beautiful women.Look at this glimpse of Cosmos evolution. Audrey Hepburn was once the role model. With good reason-–she was strong, graceful and [...]
Women’s Magazines Are Making It Worse | Cyber Tydings — February 16, 2014
[…] on the sociopolitical climate of the day. In 1965, Helen Gurley Brown became the editor of Cosmo (http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2010/04/26/guest-post-the-evolution-of-cosmopolitan-magazine/). She was a figurehead of the sexual revolution, and she wanted women to feel sexually liberated. […]
What’s in a Name? | Kyle Kehrwald — March 28, 2014
[…] audience is. In order to survive, the magazines retool themselves or else they die. Cosmopolitan was first published in 1886 and was a type of literary magazine that published short stories and has evolved since […]
cookie — February 14, 2015
i first read Cosmo when i was 7, living across the street from my grandparents and auntie….i thought the magazine was fantastic…as i did SNL, which i watched at home but more with auntie across the street. Cosmopolitan magazine was, back then, an icon…an iconic magazine that tempted in so many ways. The cover, let alone, made you want to buy the magazine. The paper used back then was nothing like today. it was better! Back in the day, ,thank you to Helen Gurley Brown, made Cosmopolitan Magazine what it was, is and should still be today.
Please…..bring back the HEART of COSMOPOLITAN…..the magazine.
Open Road Media — March 2, 2015
[…] an erotica classic—but the Cosmopolitan Magazine already is a classic. In fact, it has been around for 129 years, and over 50 years in its current, sexy style. So when Cosmo says its sharing its “sexiest stories ever,” you better believe […]
105MC: Worksheet 1 (28th September, 2015) | Carina Gonzalez-Brown — October 5, 2015
[…] http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2010/04/26/guest-post-the-evolution-of-cosmopolitan-magazine/ […]
Warrior One — August 31, 2016
Getting girls to open up their bags and pocket books for a all girl power publication was easy. What was missing was a centerfold and a male feature including full on nudity. I still wonder why only graphic stories advice and language are inside yet no graphic art photography? Little girls read Cosmo. Real women read Playboy.anyway. . I think that it's a cheap second rate failure .. Shred it up and use it in your bird cage. If you happen to find one in your home.
Goth House: Julie McGalliard lives here - Never a helpmeet Part 3: Patriarchy, what happened to it? — October 11, 2016
[…] roles, moving toward a kind of proto-feminism without always getting all the way there. (see: the Cosmo Girl.) It’s the difference between “liberated women” and “women’s […]
mayberry16 — December 6, 2018
I disagree, look at
https://www.elon.edu/u/academics/communications/journal/wp-content/uploads/sites/153/2017/12/02_Cosmopolitan_Hunsberger.pdf
Mayla Tub — December 27, 2018
My opinion is a mirror of Stacie's:
"...the magazine wouldn't be printing the "articles" that it does if the readers didn't respond to them and purchase them due to the racy and sexist content..."
Absolutely true. They're always advertising "10 hottest sex tips" which are taken from a pot of like 30 tips that are always being recycled. We do like to see repetition though because when we read about a sex tip often, chances are we'll remember it and try it sometime. When we read the same gift guide telling us to buy a sex toy from TheAdultToyShop.com every month, we will eventually remember what sex shop to visit. They even re-draw the cartoons in the same sexual positions over and over again, but really, how many do we actually remember and try to do? Should we be taking notes?
"...And it would be nice if Cosmo branched out into other subjects that women are interested in, they could draw in a larger audience (and thus more profits) if they didn't so narrowly limit their content to one of a sexual nature...." but now you'd be the same all other the other magazines out there. Don't want to step on Oprah's toes! LOL!
Orvalvania — September 9, 2020
Are you tired of jerking off?
There is a place where thousands of single girls from your city are just waiting to be fucked.
They are waiting for you here - https://clck.ru/QhQfP
@marestu145sims