Crossposted at Jezebel.
The role of women as both fans of and participants in organized sports has varied greatly in the U.S., as Karlene Ferrante demonstrates in her article* about gender and baseball. In the Victorian Era, a number of women’s baseball teams existed, and some women even played on men’s teams. For instance, Jackie Mitchell joined the Chattanooga Lookouts, a men’s team, when she was 17. In an exhibition game against the Yankees, she struck out Babe Ruth and Lou Gehrig…which people then attributed to them being nice and striking out on purpose. Discomfort with women in baseball increased over time, and eventually softball was created to provide an alternative perceived as being less strenuous and fast-paced.
In baseball and other sports, a taboo against women emerged. Many sports were seen as too rough to be appropriate for women to watch, but players and fans also worried that women presented a threat to male players, who might be distracted by the presence of women and thus not focus exclusively on the game (for a more recent example, see our post about Jessica Simpson and Tony Romo). Many believed that sex sapped a player’s strength, and many players avoided sex for several days before a game. Ferrante writes,
…in the early days of baseball women were allowed to watch games only if they were escorted. Unescorted women, and sometimes even escorted women, were harassed by cursing, spitting [fans]. (p. 249-250)
I thought of this when I saw the article Larry Harnisch (of The Daily Mirror) sent me from the L.A. Times, published on April 17, 1910. The story is about Maud Effinger, a woman who dressed in her husband’s clothing so she could attend a prizefight, which women were barred from attending (she writes about having to slip past police at the entrance):
The story, written by Maud herself, who seems rather saucy (sorry the last image is so small):
I don’t know why, exactly, women weren’t allowed into boxing matches. I suspect it might have been a combination of a belief that it was too rough for women’s delicate sensibilities, that scantily-clad men were inappropriate for them to see, and the taboo against women and their distracting ways. But the fact that she had to go incognito, slip past police, and sit in an area where she wouldn’t attract much attention indicates that the ban on women was taken quite seriously.
* Karlene Ferrante. 1994. “Baseball and the Social Construction of Gender.” Women, Media and Sport: Challenging Gender Values.
Comments 7
finette — April 22, 2010
There's a recent movie, Offside, about several Iranian girls who do the same thing in order to see their national soccer team in a World Cup qualifying match. Apparently it was inspired by the director's own daughter.
Magnetic Crow — April 22, 2010
The art school I attended began as a women-only college in 1882. Male models were not allowed to pose nude in front of the students, they had to wear a rather diaper-like loincloth. The belief was that the sight of a naked man would cause the delicate young ladies of the school to faint or experience hysteria.
Some of these early sketches still hang in the drawing room there. It's funny how the various female "delicacies" have always seemed to wedge themselves right in between women and their goals of being treated as serious professionals.
Ben Ostrowsky — April 22, 2010
It's interesting that she has to point out that she isn't a "sporting character" (does this mean 'softball player' as code for lesbian?), and that her evidence against such a charge is that she's a "clever housekeeper", she "can make the best pie in Los Angeles", and in fact is "a 'perfect lady'".
There's also some racism in her contrast between Jim Flynn, "a nice-looking white boy with a beautiful body like a statute [statue]", but Sam Langford "is like a wild animal".
Liz — April 22, 2010
"Why aren't women allowed to go to stonings, mum?"
"It's written, that's why!"
Ashley — April 22, 2010
Finette beat me to it! Offside is a great film. Crazy to think countries elsewhere still don't allow women to attend certain sports events. The people who are sticklers for the rules offer up a couple of reasons why women aren't allowed in the film. Also interesting is the fact that it was filmed during the championship itself so they didn't know if Iran was going to win or not. So the celebrations in the streets? Totally real people celebrating =D Seriously, see that movie.
IRAN WINNER, BAHRAIN LOSER
Megan — April 22, 2010
woah i didn't know there used to be a woman on the lookouts team! i'm from chattanooga, and i've been to tons of lookouts games. thanks for bringing this to my attention, that's a really awesome story