Anna sent us links to this 1967 British health awareness film, “A Cruel Kindness,” about children and obesity:
I was really struck by how little mention fresh fruits and vegetables get in the discussion of a balanced diet at the end of the first segment (about 3:45)–you just need a little of them to get the vitamins you need. Today, of course, much more emphasis would be placed on them, and fats would get much less.
Anna points out that the fault for childhood obesity is placed squarely on mothers, either for overindulging their children out of love or being too busy or lazy to get their kids enough exercise and healthy meals.
And oh, poor Valerie! She’s from a broken home. Destined to be handicapped for life, a social outcast who will grow up to be like Mrs. Brown, abandoned by her husband.
Of course, while our attitudes toward foods have changed to focus on more fruits and vegetables and fewer fats, other elements of the film would fit in with anti-obesity campaigns today with a little updating. We still often focus on individualistic causes of obesity over structural ones (what types of foods governments subsidize, for instance), implicitly blame mothers for not taking the time to cook wholesome meals at home, and treat fatness as a social death sentence. We usually try to sound nicer when doing it, though.
Gwen Sharp is an associate professor of sociology at Nevada State College. You can follow her on Twitter at @gwensharpnv.
Comments 61
tikvah4u2 — January 14, 2010
Well at least breastfeeding is shown in a positive light...
ScribeMedia.org | | The Morning Read: Five Easy Pieces for January 14 — January 14, 2010
[...] Berate the young fatties: Time once was a less socially sensitive place. Like in 1967 when British PSA’s lamented, “To Cure a Fat Child is not a Simple Matter.” Take a trip down memory lane with these videos. [...]
Cynthia — January 14, 2010
That was very interesting -- I watched all three segments. I can understand why the emphasis was on the mother so much, as she was/is still (often) the main arbiter of what foods are eaten or how much is served. Older kids (teens) might have some restraint, but the younger kids don't really self-regulate when it comes to junk food, any more than they'll remember to brush their teeth or clean their rooms without being reminded!
The government "farm bills" that subsidize the junk food are definitely a problem, particularly for families on very tight budgets. Sadly, those are often the families that don't know it's so bad for them.
Cynthia — January 14, 2010
I don't know of anyone that eats frozen bread.
peebs1701 — January 14, 2010
Careful with your terms there. There is a large difference between what is medically classified as "obesity" (BMI 30+) and "morbid obesity" (BMI 40+) Most people in the US who classify as obese are in the 30-35 range and fall significantly short of the "morbid obesity" mark.
It's also interesting that in your first paragraph you talk about how it is an individual choice but in your second you make the point that the options for many people about what to feed their family and how much time to spend on it is limited.
attentie — January 14, 2010
I think the focus should lie on promoting a healthier life style rather than thinner bodies at any costs. The real epidemic is not the fact that people are getting less atractive according to the modern beauty ideal (thin= beautiful) but that people are less active and eat more junk food and candy. Unhealthy diets or excercise routines (too much excercise can be very bad for your joints etc) are no solution. Little things, like walking or taking the bike to work instead of the car or eating vegetables and fruits every day, it all helps to stay healthier. If you lose some weight doing that, that is great, but it should not be the focus point IMHO.
mercurianferret — January 14, 2010
An interesting thing that many people aren't discussing are the recent findings that:
A) obesity is heavily influenced by your social circle and
B) one's social circle is more likely to drive one toward obesity than thinness.
(do a search of OBESITY SOCIAL GROUPS).
What this means viz direct (e.g., what was shown in the videos) and indirect actions of parenting is interesting. It implies that if the parents are obese, then the children are more likely to become obese. Further, even if the parents are not obese, if the children are socialized among obese friends, they are still more likely to become obese.
If these trends are predictable, then it additionally worrisome that 2/3 of the population is medically obese. What does this mean about parenting and being worried not only about your own kids, but also about with whom your kids are socializing (and - maybe - the health of those kids). Ah, the problems of living in networks become manifestly more difficult to address the more interwoven that network becomes...
Miss_Led — January 14, 2010
There is an obesity paradox in that overweight is protective. Fat, or overweight, people live longer than thin people.
The predominance of evidence and carefully-designed studies have repeatedly failed to support an allegedly "normal" BMI either as a measure of health or predictive of our risks for dying. In fact, the opposite has been shown, and was published in the Journal OBESITY.
This study found:
- being overweight (BMI 25 up to 30) was associated with a 25% lower risk of dying
- being obese (BMI 30 up to 35, which includes about 80% of all obese people) was associated with a 12% lower risk of dying.
- And the risks associated with the most ‘morbidly obese’ (BMIs 35+) — the uppermost 3% of this Canadian cohort— were statistically the same as those with ‘normal’ BMIs. [RR=1.09 (0.86-1.39, 95% CI) versus RR=1.0.]
Hmmm. http://www.nature.com/oby/journal/v18/n1/abs/oby2009191a.html
Dokitaro — January 14, 2010
This is the funniest thing I've seen in a while :)
KD — January 14, 2010
I love how the video contradicts itself by showing the two young boys as active and happy, and, as older men, less active, but still happy. And how, while fatness doesn't diminish the boys' happiness, it's already begun to completely ruin the young girl's life.
"Make no mistake about it, it's overfeeding that makes a child fat," the woman says at the end of the video, after she's spent the entire thing harping about how it's actually too much love, or not enough.
Lyndsay — January 14, 2010
Funny video. It's interesting to compare and contrast. And it shows one reason I've stopped listening to weight loss advice. So the boy was supposed to eat lots of protein and some fat and less starchy foods but lately I keep seeing articles encouraging people to eat more vegetarian meals. Whole grains are emphasized as important. They just can't make up their minds. And at the beginning of that video they talked about balance of protein, fats, and carbs (and some vitamins) but later they emphasize proteins.
Noelley B — January 14, 2010
I dunno, I've been overweight or borderline obese my entire life. When I was a highschooler, I was pretty anorexic, eating maybe half a sandwich or a piece of fruit all day before eating small portions at dinner, and I was fairly active, being involved in stagecraft at school and through community theater, which involved running around, lifting heavy things, and being generally pretty active. I would then walk the mile or so home. Later, when I moved to Arizona, I also did a lot of swimming and swordfighting, and wondering around labyrinthine subdivisions for hours on end. Still the fat girl. As an adult, I'm nearly vegan, and had worked on farms for years, moving dirt, moving rocks, climbing trees, that sort of thing. Still the fat girl. I recently moved to the city and started taking anti-depressants, and in six months, I've dropped about 15 pounds. I eat more junk food (I never new there were som many brands of vegan ice cream!) than I have in years, and yet, I'm still dropping inches. I have no idea how this works, but I wonder if there is causation as well as correlation between becoming less depressed and becoming less fat.
Maggie — January 14, 2010
Guys, I'm pretty sure A.O. is the same America-hating troll who's polluted many other threads on this site. It's best to ignore him/her.
That said, Health At Every Size, What We Hear In Mainstream Media About Fat Is Highly Suspect, and I Can Be As Fat As I Want Because You're Clearly As Hateful As You Want And What We Both Do Is Our Own Damned Business. Ptooey!
http://kateharding.net/faq/but-dont-you-realize-fat-is-unhealthy/
Jenn — January 14, 2010
Your choice of blog at which to ply your trolly wares is interesting. Wouldn't People of Walmart be a more appropriate venue for your anti-USA-themed, baseless assertions and poorly developed critical thinking skills?
styleygeek — January 14, 2010
The part that cracked me up was when the doctor told one of the fat boys that if he kept losing weight, he'd soon be winning running races. Because of course running speed is entirely a function of how much you weigh and has nothing to do with training! (And then in the next shot you see him actually winning the race and beating plenty of children who are still much skinnier than him, which kind of ruins the point they were making.)
KD — January 14, 2010
The only frozen breads I know of are those you can get in the health section of the grocery store, which are tastier and healthier than the fresh-baked table-bread variety you'll find in the bread aisle. It's also a god-send for people that cohabitate with celiacs...if you can afford it, as it's about 5x - 7x the price of a regular loaf of bread.
depresso — January 15, 2010
But what about poor, poor Valerie? What happened to her? Maybe she grew a bit older and realised that beauty is from within and thin =/= healthy/beautiful/a good person and that's why we see nothing more of her after her mother tells her to stop eating chocolate?
“What are calories, doctor?” « Food Rant — January 20, 2010
[...] evolve – or don’t. Also, some of them are just plain hilarious. They recently posted this 1960s PSA film, about children and obesity, which, as so many of these things, teeters on that fine, fine line [...]
Kathy — December 21, 2010
The sixties were absolutely notorious for this kind of "help". There wasn't enough REAL help to put in a thimble, but there was a lot of authoritative lecturing. I feel genuinely sorry for anybody who sincerely sought help back then. If you got any, it was purely an accident.
It wasn't til I read Susan Powter's books a few years ago, that I really understood the relationship between food and weight.
Bri — January 17, 2011
Why does the Father have absolutely no part in his Child's health?
DW Steinmetz — April 16, 2011
Oh by all means, let's make it a GENDER issue. It's all MOM'S fault (said with sarcasm). If I were a dad and my kids were feeding like pigs at a slop bucket, I would definitely intervene. It's far too easy to blame various, faceless entities (the government, McDonalds). Or one gender over the other. The main reason why so many kids (and adults) are disgusting fatbodies is lack of discipline. Both personal AND parental. End of discussion. Get off your fat bum and walk a few minutes every day. Stop eating junk all the time. And teach your kids the same. See mercurianferret's post about peer pressure. Lead by example.