Dawn A. sent us these posters for The Sarah Connor Chronicles. Notice how, in three out of four posters, the women are not making eye-contact and, in all of them, they are in a passive pose with a passive facial expression. Dawn adds:
I’m alarmed by the disembodiment of the character. While she may be a part of the Terminator series, would we ever see Arnold Schwarzenegger (or other male characters) portrayed like this in posters?
Thanks Dawn!
NEW: After a discussion with my friend Jason, I decided to offer some more images and commentary as food for thought.
Here are the Terminator posters I could find featuring Schwartzenegger. There are a lot of things separating and potentially separating these posters from those above other than gender: about 20 years, maybe the moral of the movies/series or the feeling of the show, and surely producers/directors etc. Even so, I think it’s worth putting up the images for contrast.
Back to The Sarah Connor Chronicles: Below are some additional promotional images that do not reproduce the passivity we see in the first set. Word on the street is (or so I have heard some people say), the women are not as feminized in the series as they are in the promotional material (which, if true, is interesting in itself).
Still, Jason notes that the empowerment of the women in the series as protectors, comes at the cost of disempowering John Connor and that disempowerment is achieved, in part, through his feminization. His task, then, as the series progresses, is to finally become a “man.” At that point, supposedly, he would no longer need the protection of women.
So, femininity is still associated with weakness. And, insofar as femininity is equated with weakness, and women are more-or-less required to do at least some femininity (lest they be called “dykes” or “bitches”), women are more-or-less required to appear at least a little bit weak in their daily lives.
Comments 7
Dismembered Summer Glau in Sarah Connor Chronicles posters at Hoyden About Town — June 3, 2008
[...] And it was her words that came to mind when I saw this Fox poster advertising Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles on Sociological Images: [...]
el forastero — June 3, 2008
I think there are more in this pictures that you can see at plain said. There are beutiful pictures. The third one, was the winner of a fan of the show in a contest to make posters.
I think this is a good example of cyborg, and the separation between the body and the machine. And where is exactly that limit. Schwarzenegger was man or machine (theres one picture where you can see both parts still theres not an simple organic union with the machine), and is in a woman where that union comes almost naturally. I don´t think we are talking about disembodiment of the character, but may be quite the opposite. Powerful women with mechanic, and more powerful parts.
Breck — June 4, 2008
We have seen male action heroes in this kind of passive pose before, though. The poster of Vin Diesel for xXx comes immediately to mind, but a quick search returns the following male movie heroes in passive, downcast-gaze poster poses for 2008: Mark Wahlberg in The Happening, Ed Norton in The Incredible Hulk, Matthew Fox in Speed Racer, and Sylvester Stallone in Rambo.
There are others, surely. I have no idea what the proportionality of female action heroes in these poses is compared to male action heroes, but I don't necessarily see it a exclusive to a single gender. It should be noted, however, that some of the examples I gave are one pose of several, where this set seems to show the stars posed this way exclusively.
I actually don't see this pose as 'passive', either. To me it recalls the pose of Michelangelo's David. While previous David sculptures showed him either in triumph or in battle, Michelangelo depicted the moment of contemplation before the defining event, which heightened the drama. This approach was so successful, one barely has to say "Michelangelo's" when talking about this David, though no less an artist than Donatello has a pretty great David of his own.
SPOILER BELOW for a 22-year old movie, though: C'mon, people!
The half-torn-apart image is pretty disturbing. We've seen a masculine version of that, too, however (only in the movie, not on posters though). In Aliens, the male android character Bishop is torn in two and drags himself around by his arms for a while. It wouldn't have made sense as a poster, because the character was new to the series, wouldn't have meant anything to fans of the original film, and would have been a spoiler, to boot.
So anyway, those two images on the left are a little weird because of the dehumanization, but that ambiguity is the point of the character (caveat: I have not seen the TV series, but have seen all the films. No, I'm not proud.). The down-and-away gaze does not strike me as particularly sexist or passive given the popularity of this pose in contemporary action movie posters.
Great find, though.
Smite Me! [.net] » Blog Archive » elsewhere on the internets, 2008-06-05 — June 5, 2008
[...] REPRESENTING HEROINES IN THE SARAH CONNOR CHRONICLES @ Sociological Images [...]
Sociological Images » WHAT WE’VE BEEN UP TO BEHIND YOUR BACK (JUNE 2008) — June 20, 2008
[...] For contrast, I added the posters from the Terminator Trilogy to our post on how female heroines were represented in posters for The Sarah Connor Chronicles. [...]
Breck — July 2, 2008
They also gave him emo hair, which is unforgivable.
/rimshot.
On being female and resisting the feminist label.. « Prioritizing the Paranoias — July 22, 2008
[...] as Sociological Images illustrates so well on a daily basis (they are quickly becoming my new favorite blog), we as a society are [...]