Despite all kinds of “truces” and “promises” in the media lately about “leaving race and gender out” of the democratic primaries, gender and race are obviously a part of this presidential election cycle.
But, here’s a newsflash: even when the candidates are all white men, gender and race are STILL a part of the decisions made about who should be president.
Think back to 2004 for a moment– remember all those political cartoons criticizing Kerry for being too “French” (as opposed to American Cowboy) and generally feminizing his image (feminine = bad for politics) in political cartoons.
I’m fascinated by the anti-Hillary Clinton facebook groups. There are dozens of these groups, but four groups have the most members.
- Stop Running for President and Make Me a Sandwich– 30,000+ members
- Anti Hillary Clinton for President ’08– 65,000+ members
- Stop Hillary Clinton: One Million Strong AGAINST Hillary– 700,000+ members
- Life’s a Bitch, Why Vote for One?– 14,000+ members
So this morning I spent some time looking at the images that dominate these groups. The images these groups use to criticize Clinton as a presidential candidate make it pretty clear that sexism is alive and well (beyond the protesters asking Clinton to iron their shirts)– and that gendered ways to talk about politics are as cogent as ever! Here’s a smattering for you– there are so many I couldn’t possibly post them all!
Comments 10
Gwen — January 18, 2008
OH. MY. GOD. Ick ick ick.
snizz — January 18, 2008
Beyond fascinating. What interests me most is how the women who are members of these groups see and identify with these images. Reminds me of Stockholm Syndrome, haha.
Lisa — January 18, 2008
I seriously second the ick.
Anonymous — January 25, 2008
I'm joining these groups, not just because I think some of these images are funny, but because I think Hillary as Pres. will set us women back 50 years. We've worked too hard to get where we are going, and Hillary is NOT the answer. I'll vote Republican before I vote for another "Tax-me out of everything I earn" Clinton.
Anonymous — January 25, 2008
Unrelated to Hillary Clinton, but still pertaining to women and politics, I found this ad to be interresting: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2256/2219016703_611494f753_o.jpg
berdisthewerd — March 20, 2008
www.ladyandfluff.blogspot.com
Sociological Images » More election ‘08 images — May 13, 2008
[...] See also these and these. [...]
L. G. — December 5, 2008
Anon-- Um, no. What sets women back 50 years is the attitude that we shouldn't have agency over our own bodies, or equal pay in equivalent jobs ---as Palin believes.
At least Hillary supports the right of choice (and yes, this is also a civil right).
I know I'm a bit late on this one, but MAN that pissed me off.
Anonymous — February 21, 2009
Wow. What a bunch of retarded neanderthal maggots-for-brains cartoons. And cowardly, too. Oh, it's soooo scary, a powerful woman!! Everybody run and hide!! Call her bad names so everyone will be diverted from the fact that she's intellectually superior to me!! This is the kind of thing that makes me want to pull a Van Morrison.
Cliffy44 — April 4, 2013
"What Difference Does It Really Make?"
I just wanted to say that no one should ever even consider nominating anyone who could have that non-complacent attitude about 4 Americans killed, so as to bolster the chances of the corrupt muslim to remain close enough to the election, so as to be able to corruptly win. IF Governor Romney had received the results of a legitimate election, then, WE THE PEOPLE wouldn't be facing the same fate as the 4 men that Monica Lewinsky's competition allowed, with no real concern for their safety.
I'd sooner vote for Jody Arias, before I'd vote for Hillary.
AND, if anyone has a problem with anything that I've written here, at least I didn't hide behind an "Anonymous" name; and if you really object to my opinion, then, print out my comments; and roll up the printout; and then, shove it up your obama-hole.