Last Tuesday, Feb. 9, I learned of a Facebook fan page dedicated to “Killing your hooker so you don’t have to pay her.” As a sex worker ally, sexuality scholar, and someone invested in the humane treatment of all people, I became dedicated over the next 24 hours to shut that page down. I immediately reported the page to Facebook administrators, and encouraged all of my Facebook friends to do the same. On Wednesday, Feb. 10 at 1:26 pm (PST) when the site was still up, I posted the following to my Facebook friends:
“In less than 24 hours, I have seen the FB site dedicated to “killing your hooker” increase from 17,500 fans to now more than 22,000. Please join me in kicking this FB group out of our community; report it to the FB directors. This group is in clear violation of FB rules, including: 6. You will not bully, intimidate, or harass any user.7. You will not post content that is hateful, threatening, … etc”
Many other sex worker activists and humanitarians across the globe were simultaneously doing the same work. By Wednesday at 5 pm (PST), just over 24 hours after I learned of the site, and just days after its creation, Facebook administrators deleted the site. For Facebook, this was not a matter of “free speech”; it was a matter of a clear violation of their community rules. (Hate groups and bullies all of kinds are free to proliferate on the internet, but are not welcome on specific community membership cites such as Facebook).
Unfortunately, I fear and see that this is just the beginning of hate-speech pages on Facebook. Because Facebook allows anyone to set up an account, and because (at least for now) it seems that Facebook administrators are not pro-active in monitoring hate groups, everyday Facebook users (people like me who would otherwise be taking breaks from work to post about their kids or their cats) have found that they have an ethical obligation to also watch out for and report Facebook hategroups.
The group Feministing.com is one such group that this week has found itself to be one of these reporting the abusive, hate-filled page. As might be expected, those behind the “killing your hooker” fanpage are not happy about the critique. Here’s one quote from the “killing your hooker” folks:
“The worthless CUNTS over at Feministing are reporting you because they think they are the policemen (oops policePERSONS) of the internet. Let Feminist cunts know what you think about their crusade to silence all free speech they deem “inappropriate.” (see article in Carnalnation.com)
These slurs against women and feminists are as old as misogyny and a common tactic for diverting attention away from serious, grownup critique and dialogue. The issue of “free speech” is one that is incredibly important, but it is a principle that is always constituted and negotiated within particular parameters. “The internet” is a broad space that allows all (and hence not a true “community”), but Facebook is a smaller space with particular rules.
Carnalnation.com (the group reporting on this story above) is a community that is very much dedicated to freedom of speech and expression, but it too is absolutely opposed to the inclusion of hategroups in the Facebook community. In their mission statement Carnalnation states that:
“In our view, fear and disdain of all things sexual have led to a society that too often vacillates between impulsive titillation and compulsive repression. Such extremes can only have a negative impact on our physical, psychological, and social well being.”
Carnalnation.com is encouraging its readers to report hategroups such as “killing your hooker,” and has found that there are “232 (Facebook) groups that currently have the words “dead hooker” in them. (Dead Hooker Storage, Accidentally Pissing On A Dead Hooker, and A Dead Hooker A Day Keeps The Doctor Away are just three of them.)” Feministing.com is also reporting that “killing your hooker” now has simply morphed into a new Facebook fan page (still live as of this writing), entitled “GTA taught me that if you kill a hooker, you get your money back.” (note: GTA here stands for Grand Theft Auto, a video game.)
According to today’s Sydney Morning Herald the creator of “killing your hooker” has been identified. Who was the creator of this page, Gary Ridgeway?
(Gary Ridgeway, AKA “The Green River Killer,” is serving a life sentence for the murders of 48 women, most of whom he picked up on the streets of Seattle/Tacoma as prostitutes. After his sentencing Ridgeway admitted to a “career” of murdering 71 women.)
No, the source of “killing your hooker” is an Australian boy described as a “Catholic school student”:
A Catholic school student has been “dealt with” after he set up a Facebook page that appeared to advocate killing prostitutes. … The principal of St Laurence’s College in Queensland, Ian McDonald, confirmed a student from the school had been disciplined over the creation of the page.
“It has been sorted out and the boy has been dealt with,” Mr McDonald told AAP on Friday.
Ian McDonald, the principal of the private Catholic school (which at least one Australian newspaper describes as “elite”) went on to underscore that:
“This didn’t happen at the school, but does highlight the fact that we really need to educate the students about the dangers on the internet.” (emphasis mine).
In this logic, the magical, uncontrollable “internet” is the problem, as opposed to cultures that support (or do not directly challenge) the violent degradation of entire groups of people.
Case in point: In one of the several online groups discussing this case today, “Middie” complains about people taking this issue too seriously:
There are so many sites going against this. Jesus people, take a fucking joke. Do you realize this is based on the game GTA? I know the guy that did it, and i’m pretty sure he didn’t make it for real life hookers. By the way, hookers are illegal, so they have no fucking rights in my eyes. (emphasis mine).
Dear Principal McDonald: please note that that “Middie” is probably one of your students. These attitudes do not come to exist in a cultural vacuum. The culture of your school is what you need to be concerned with, not the “internet.”
Dear “Middie“: your point brings us precisely to the larger problem of a lack of support for the human rights of all, including sex workers. And although prostitution is actually LEGAL in parts of Australia (where you apparently currently reside), your point illustrates the need for clearly articulated and enforced sex workers rights in Australia and elsewhere.
Principal McDonald, parents, internet and sexuality scholars and activists, please do not blame “the internet” for sites like this; we must investigate how our own assumptions promote (or stay silent on) everyday acts of cruelty.
_______
Postscript:
In addition the obvious humanitarian need to oppose the degradation of any group of people, many public health scholars emphasize the importance of reducing stigma for sex workers. Here is a link to a recent blog post by Dr. Petra Boynton, on Sex workers, Stigma, and Barriers to Health.
Comments 10
Kailey — February 13, 2010
He's your pal, its principal. sorry- I hate to be that person, but I believe in your message, and it is more effective when words are spelled correctly.
(:
thanks for the otherwise overwhelmingly great article and analysis!
Kari Lerum — February 13, 2010
Kailey, thanks for the spell check (I fixed it)!
Verlinkenswertes (06/10) | Criminologia — February 14, 2010
[...] Making Hate Fun: Facebook users continue to joke en mass about killing “hookers” Last Tuesday, Feb. 9, I learned of a Facebook fan page dedicated to “Killing your hooker so you don’t have to pay her.” As a sex worker ally, sexuality scholar, and someone invested in the humane treatment of all people, I became dedicated over the next 24 hours to shut that page down. I immediately reported the page to Facebook administrators, and encouraged all of my Facebook friends to do the same. On Wednesday, Feb. 10 at 1:26 pm (PST) when the site was still up, I posted the following to my Facebook friends … (Contexts Blogs: All Blogs, 13.02,2010) [...]
Noelley B — February 19, 2010
I tried the link to Dr. Petra's blog post twice, and I got an error message twice. This seems to be the url you're looking for: http://www.drpetra.co.uk/blog/sex-workers-stigma-and-barriers-to-health/
Angela Wendler — February 28, 2010
This article brings up the interesting argument of who is responsible for the content of the internet. In my opinion, the internet is an open database for people to use however he/she chooses, but I also believe that each individual needs to be held accountable for his/her actions "due to" internet material. We have all been socialized and therefore, know the basic concepts of right and wrong within society, therefore any action a person chooses to take is not done out of ignorance. For example, the Facebook group "Killing your hooker so you don't have to pay her" - honestly?! This group is a perfect depiction of someone abusing the internet and the anonymous nature of postings; He knew that it was wrong to create a group around this subject matter but since it was on the internet and no one really seemed to care that he was the one who started it... it must be okay. People are far more likely to say or do something controversial if he/she does not think he/she will be held accountable, and the internet is an open avenue for this kind of negligent behavior. I am not trying to say that the internet should be blamed for the inconsiderate and rude acts of individuals, I am instead saying that individuals need take responsibility for their actions (anonymous or otherwise). The only way to slow the creation of negativity through the internet is to remind children, teens, and other adults that even a story, group, or blog without a specific identity can cause pain and controversy.
Theresa — March 1, 2010
While I agree that the Internet is not to blame for these groups (obviously there are people and ideas behind the creations of these terrible groups), I do think that the Internet is a new tool and form of expression that allows people to say things they otherwise wouldn't. The appeal of anonymity is quite dangerous. Most people tone down their opinions when in public with other people, but when writing on the Internet it is possible to say anything or be anyone. People might just be saying things to get a rise out of others, or they might polarize their own opinions through contact with other "radicals". There is no way to know if the creators of these groups are truly serious about their feelings about hookers, or if they really are just joking about a game that went too far. Regardless, the effect is the same. Just as there is no way to tell the true intention of the creator, the creator has no idea how their words will impact others. People can and will be hurt by these words, and it could cause more people to adopt the same opinion about hookers, further perpetuating the problem.
Ike — March 3, 2010
Funny, because murder is illegal in more places than prostitution. Does that mean Middie shouldn't have rights in my eyes?
Women and depression (i.e. “no shit”) « The Delphiad Blog — August 13, 2010
[...] and harassment when not conforming to normative beauty standards - lower self-esteem due to rampant misogyny and its psychological impact - lower salaries - higher rates of poverty, especially for single [...]
Trigger Warning: Facebook | Miss Kitty Stryker — June 9, 2013
[...] not ok to bully someone for their status as a sexual assault victim- yet they allow pages that actively encourage violence against sex workers, because that’s just funny, right? I can’t be a porn star on Facebook, but I can be a [...]
Consent Culture » Blog Archive » Trigger Warning: Facebook — June 9, 2013
[...] not ok to bully someone for their status as a sexual assault victim- yet they allow pages that actively encourage violence against sex workers, because that’s just funny, right? I can’t be a porn star on Facebook, but I can be a [...]